Communication publiée dans un ouvrage (Colloques, congrès, conférences scientifiques et actes)
Related-Tweak Impossible Differential Cryptanalysis of Reduced-Round TweAES
Niu, Chao; Li, Muzhou; Wang, Meiqinet al.
2021 • In Selected Areas in Cryptography - SAC 2021 - 24th International Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada, September 29 - October 01, 2021, Revised Selected Papers
Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT) > CryptoLUX
Disciplines :
Sciences informatiques
Auteur, co-auteur :
Niu, Chao
Li, Muzhou
Wang, Meiqin
WANG, Qingju ; University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > Cryptolux
Yiu, Siu-Ming
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Related-Tweak Impossible Differential Cryptanalysis of Reduced-Round TweAES
Date de publication/diffusion :
2021
Nom de la manifestation :
Selected Areas in Cryptography - SAC 2021 - 24th International Conference (SAC 2021)
Lieu de la manifestation :
Ottawa, ON, Canada
Date de la manifestation :
September 29 - October 01, 2021
Manifestation à portée :
International
Titre de l'ouvrage principal :
Selected Areas in Cryptography - SAC 2021 - 24th International Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada, September 29 - October 01, 2021, Revised Selected Papers
Bahrak, B., Aref, M.R.: Impossible differential attack on seven-round AES-128. IET Inf. Secur. 2(2), 28–32 (2008)
Barrett, C.W., Sebastiani, R., Seshia, S.A., Tinelli, C.: Satisfiability modulo theories. In: Biere, A., Heule, M., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.) Handbook of Satisfiability, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 185, pp. 825–885. IOS Press (2009)
Beierle, C., et al.: The SKINNY family of block ciphers and its low-latency variant MANTIS. In: Robshaw, M., Katz, J. (eds.) CRYPTO 2016. LNCS, vol. 9815, pp. 123–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53008-5 5
Bonnetain, X., Naya-Plasencia, M., Schrottenloher, A.: Quantum security analysis of AES. IACR Trans. Symmetric Cryptol. 2019(2), 55–93 (2019)
Boura, C., Lallemand, V., Naya-Plasencia, M., Suder, V.: Making the impossible possible. J. Cryptol. 31(1), 101–133 (2018)
Boura, C., Naya-Plasencia, M., Suder, V.: Scrutinizing and improving impossible differential attacks: applications to CLEFIA, Camellia, LBlock and Simon. In: Sarkar, P., Iwata, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8873, pp. 179–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45611-8 10
Chakraborti, A., Datta, N., Jha, A., Mancillas-López, C., Nandi, M., Sasaki, Y.: ESTATE: a lightweight and low energy authenticated encryption mode. IACR Trans. Symmetric Cryptol. 2020(S1), 350–389 (2020)
Cook, S.A.: The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. In: Harrison, M.A., Banerji, R.B., Ullman, J.D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 3–5 May 1971, Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA, pp. 151–158. ACM (1971)
Demirci, H., Selçuk, A.A.: A meet-in-the-middle attack on 8-round AES. In: Nyberg, K. (ed.) FSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5086, pp. 116–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71039-4 7
Derbez, P., Fouque, P.-A., Jean, J.: Improved key recovery attacks on reduced-round, in the single-key setting. In: Johansson, T., Nguyen, P.Q. (eds.) EURO-CRYPT 2013. LNCS, vol. 7881, pp. 371–387. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38348-9 23
Dworkin, M., Barker, E., Nechvatal, J., Foti, J., Bassham, L., Roback, E., Dray, J.: Advanced encryption standard (aes), 26 November 2001. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.197
Gilbert, H.: A simplified representation of AES. In: Sarkar, P., Iwata, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8873, pp. 200–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45611-8 11
Jean, J., Nikolić, I., Peyrin, T.: Tweaks and keys for block ciphers: the TWEAKEY framework. In: Sarkar, P., Iwata, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8874, pp. 274–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45608-8 15
Jérémy Jean, I.N., Peyrin., T.: Deoxys v1.41. Submission to CAESAR (2016). https://competitions.cr.yp.to/round3/deoxysv141.pdf
Leurent, G., Pernot, C.: New representations of the AES key schedule. In: Canteaut, A., Standaert, F.-X. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2021. LNCS, vol. 12696, pp. 54– 84. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77870-5 3
Liu, Y., et al.: STP models of optimal differential and linear trail for s-box based ciphers. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. 2019, 25 (2019)
Mouha, N., Preneel, B.: Towards finding optimal differential characteristics for arx: Application to salsa20. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2013/328 (2013). https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/328
Sun, S., et al.: Analysis of AES, skinny, and others with constraint programming. IACR Trans. Symmetric Cryptol. 2017(1), 281–306 (2017)
Tiessen, T.: Polytopic cryptanalysis. In: Fischlin, M., Coron, J.-S. (eds.) EURO-CRYPT 2016. LNCS, vol. 9665, pp. 214–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49890-3 9
Zong, R., Dong, X.: Milp-aided related-tweak/key impossible differential attack and its applications to qarma, joltik-bc. IEEE Access 7, 153683–153693 (2019)
