Reference : Waiting as probation: selecting self-disciplining asylum seekers
Scientific journals : Article
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Sociology & social sciences
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Anthropology
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Human geography & demography
Migration and Inclusive Societies
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/47802
Waiting as probation: selecting self-disciplining asylum seekers
English
Vianelli, Lorenzo mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Geography and Spatial Planning (DGEO) >]
Gill, Nick mailto [University of Exeter > College of Life and Environmental Sciences > Department of Geography]
Hoellerer, Nicole mailto [University of Exeter > College of Life and Environmental Sciences > Department of Geography]
2021
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Carfax Publishing
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
1369-183X
1469-9451
United Kingdom
[en] Governmentality ; Waiting ; Asylum adjudication ; Refugee integration ; Humanitarian protection ; Asylum seekers
[en] This article diagnoses and critiques a type of governmentality
associated with waiting during protracted asylum appeal
procedures by drawing upon data from a multi-methodological
study of asylum adjudication in Europe. Focusing on Austria,
Germany and Italy, we explore the use of integration-related
considerations in asylum appeal processes by looking at the ways in
which these considerations permeate judges’ decision-making,
particularly, but not exclusively, on the granting of national, non-EU
harmonised protection statuses. Building on insights from the
literature on conditional integration we question the implicit sociopolitical
biases and moral assumptions that underpin this
permeation. We show that the use of integration-related
considerations in asylum appeals transforms migrant waiting into a
period of probation during which rejected asylum seekers’ conducts
are governed and tested in relation to the use of time. More than
simply waiting patiently, rejected asylum seekers are expected to
wait productively, whereby productivity is assessed through the
neoliberal imperatives of entrepreneurship, autonomy and selfimprovement.
We thus contribute to scholarship on migrant
waiting by showing how time is capitalised by state authorities
even when – and actually because – it offers opportunities for
migrants.
European Research Council
ASYFAIR
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/47802
10.1080/1369183X.2021.1926942
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369183X.2021.1926942
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
H2020 ; 677917 - ASYFAIR - Fair and Consistent Border Controls? A Critical, Multi-methodological and Interdisciplinary Study of Asylum Adjudication in Europe

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Waiting as probation. Selecting self-disciplining asylum seekers - Vianelli, Gill, Hoellerer.pdfPublisher postprint1.98 MBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.