Reference : Response to my critics: In defense of Kant’s aesthetic nonconceptualism
Scientific journals : Article
Arts & humanities : Philosophy & ethics
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/44971
Response to my critics: In defense of Kant’s aesthetic nonconceptualism
English
Heidemann, Dietmar mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Humanities (DHUM) >]
2020
Con-Textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy
Con-Textos Kantianos
12
173-190
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
2386-7655
Madrid
Spain
[en] Kant ; aesthetics ; non-conceptual content
[en] In this article I respond to objections that Matías Oroño, Silvia del Luján di Saanza, Pedro
Stepanenko and Luciana Martínez have raised against my non-conceptualist reading of Kant’s
aesthetics. The objections are both, substantial and instructive. I first sketch my non-conceptualist
reading of Kant’s doctrine of judgments of taste and then turn to what I take to be the most
important criticisms that these authors have put forward. Two difficulties with a non-conceptualist
reading of Kant’s aesthetics seem to be central: the cognitive status of judgments of taste and the
representationalist capacity of aesthetic feeling as non-conceptual mental content. I respond to
these and additional objections and defend my overall non-conceptualist interpretation of Kant’s
aesthetics against my critics. I argue that Kant’s aesthetics is highly relevant for the debate over
whether or not Kant is a (non-)conceptualist.
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/44971
10.5281/zenodo.4304075

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Heidemann, Response to my critics.pdfPublisher postprint503.5 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.