goal conflict; action goal; motivational interference; motivation; self-regulation; personal goals
Résumé :
[en] Multiple-goal pursuit and conflict between personal life-defining goals can be considered part of everyday business in most individuals' lives. Given the potentially detrimental effects of goal conflict-for example, impaired well-being or poor performance-the literature on goal conflict is surprisingly scattered due to heterogeneous methodological approaches and technical terms. Little empirical research has addressed the conceptualization of goal conflict against the background of differing understandings from a structure-like and a process-like perspective. In the present article, we outline theoretical foundations of goal conflict from two perspectives: a structure-and a process-like perspective. Based on a comparative analysis and integration of these two perspectives, we systematically review empirical studies on goal conflict over 30 years of research. In doing so, we identify and discuss important conceptual dimensions of goal conflict, namely, goal conflict as a cognitive construct and an experiential instance, a focus on goal interrelations or on specific goal properties, and resource vs. inherent conflict, and the potential of these distinctions to further research on goal conflict. Finally, we present major challenges and pose questions that need to be addressed by future research.
GRUND, Axel ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Luxembourg Centre for Educational Testing (LUCET)
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Aiming at a Moving Target: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations in the Study of Intraindividual Goal Conflict between Personal Goals
Date de publication/diffusion :
2017
Titre du périodique :
Frontiers in Psychology
eISSN :
1664-1078
Maison d'édition :
Frontiers Media Sa, Lausanne, Inconnu/non spécifié
Volume/Tome :
8
Pagination :
2011-14
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
Organisme subsidiant :
Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftGerman Research Foundation (DFG) Bielefeld University
Commentaire :
Article Processing Charge funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University.