Contribution to collective works (Parts of books)
Self-Regulation of Fundamental Rights? The EU Code of Conduct on Hate Speech, Related Initiatives and Beyond
Quintel, Teresa Alegra; Ullrich, Carsten
2020In Ojanen, Tuomas; Petkova, Bilyana (Eds.) Fundamental Rights Protection Online: the Future Regulation of Intermediaries
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
2018_Self-Regulation of Fundamental Rights_Quintel_Ullrich.pdf
Author preprint (639.68 kB)
Book Chapyter, Book Publication planned for autumn 2019
Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
fundamental rights; intermediary liability; internet governance; regulatory governance; hate speech; enforcement; self-regulation; co-regulation; online platforms
Abstract :
[en] This contribution will give a brief overview of EU legislation encouraging self-regulation, such as codes of conduct, communications and recommendations and propose an alternative approach towards fighting illegal content on online platforms, which ventures squarely into co-regulation. There is no formal and straightforward definition on what constitutes illegal hate speech. However, hate speech might be classified as targeting minority groups in a way that promotes violence or social disorder and hatred. The use of social media and online platforms to spread illegal content and hate speech has increased progressively during recent years, as content may be disseminated anonymously and further shared by other users. Therefore, the timely removal or blocking of access to illegal content is essential to limit the wider dissemination and harm of individuals targeted by hate speech. The prominent role of online platforms in revolutionizing modern communication and as influencers of the public opinion has increasingly come to the attention of policy makers. Since online platforms provide an important stage for phenomena such as ‘fake news’, ‘hate speech’ or ‘disinformation’, the pressure to take more responsibility over content hosted by them has grown. The EU Commission took action via several attempts to set certain rules for online intermediaries, mostly relying on non-binding agreements, often in the form of self-regulatory measures, such as codes of conduct, guidelines and recommendations. These measures have raised concerns regarding possible limitations of Freedom of Expression, because they require online platforms to adjudicate on the legality of content, often by relying on automated systems. Meanwhile decisions over the unlawfulness of hate speech and “disinformation” are often notoriously difficult. The deployment of algorithms to analyse the content generated on platforms, such as recognition and filtering technologies, bear risks and pitfalls of automated compliance solutions. Although the use of algorithms to monitor content online still happens based on the “human-in-the-loop principle”, the diligence and efficiency with which illegal content can be reviewed is also dependent on the financial capacity and resources of each company. In addition, these privatized removal procedures maybe influenced by commercial interests and lack effective appeals mechanisms. All these issues throw up serious questions about the democratic legitimacy of self-regulatory removal procedures An alternative solution, proposed in this article, would require platforms to apply a risk-based approach to preventing and removing illegal content. The norms and standards of such an approach would be based on duty of care and be subject to regulatory oversight. It is suggested that the current self-regulatory proposals be replaced by co-regulatory solutions.
Disciplines :
European & international law
Author, co-author :
Quintel, Teresa Alegra ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Law Research Unit ; Uppsala University > Department of Law
Ullrich, Carsten ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Law Research Unit
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Self-Regulation of Fundamental Rights? The EU Code of Conduct on Hate Speech, Related Initiatives and Beyond
Publication date :
December 2020
Main work title :
Fundamental Rights Protection Online: the Future Regulation of Intermediaries
Editor :
Ojanen, Tuomas
Petkova, Bilyana
Publisher :
Edward Elgar Publishing
ISBN/EAN :
9781788976671
Collection name :
Elgar Law, Technology and Society series
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Focus Area :
Law / European Law
Available on ORBilu :
since 21 December 2018

Statistics


Number of views
458 (14 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
854 (19 by Unilu)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu