Argumentation as Exogenous Coordination

Reference : Argumentation as Exogenous Coordination


	Document type :	Parts of books : Contribution to collective works
	Discipline(s) :	Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science
	To cite this reference:	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/36355

Title :	Argumentation as Exogenous Coordination
Language :	English
Author, co-author :	van der Torre, Leon [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >]
	Rienstra, Tjitze [University of Koblenz-Landau]
	Gabbay, Dov M. [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >]
Publication date :	2018
Main document title :	It's All About Coordination
Publisher :	Springer
Pages :	208-223
Peer reviewed :	Yes
Abstract :	[en] Formal argumentation is one of the most popular approaches in modern logic and reasoning. The theory of abstract argumentation introduced by Dung in 1995 has shifted the focus from the internal structure of arguments to relations among arguments, and temporal dynamics for abstract argumentation was proposed by Barringer, Gabbay and Woods in 2005. In this tradition, we see arguments as reasoning processes, and the interaction among them as a coordination process.We argue that abstract argumentation can adopt ideas and techniques from formal theories of coordination, and as an example we propose a model of sequential abstract argumentation loosely inspired by Reo’s model of exogenous coordination. We show how the argumentation model can represent the temporal dynamics of the liar paradox and predator-prey like behaviour.
Permalink :	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/36355

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

	File	Commentary	Version	Size	Access
Open access	aaa.pdf		Author preprint	158.84 kB	View/Open

All documents in ORBi^lu are protected by a user license.