relevance; legal knowledge modeling; access to legal information
Résumé :
[en] Accessing relevant legal information found in text excerpts from heterogeneous sources is essential to the decision making process in consumer disputes. The Ontology of Relevant Legal Information in Consumer Disputes (ric) is the domain-independent ontology modeling this relevant legal information comprising rights, their requisites, exceptions, constraints, enforcement procedures, legal sources. Its use is exemplified with one extension thereof, the Air Transport Passenger Incidents Ontology (ric-atpi), representing both the possible incidents triggered by a complaint in the air transport passenger domain and the related legal information that might be applicable. The Ontology models the key provisions found in hard law, and those in soft law, comprising heterogeneous sources in a structured manner. An ontology-based system provides the knowledge embedded in the legal sources and their relation to the specific scenario.
Disciplines :
Droit, criminologie & sciences politiques: Multidisciplinaire, généralités & autres
Auteur, co-auteur :
Santos, Cristiana; Institute of Law and Technology, Autonomous University of Barcelona - IDT-UAB
Rodriguez Doncel, Victor; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - UPM > Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial > Ontology Engineering Group - OEG
Casanovas, Pompeu; Institute of Law and Technology, Autonomous University of Barcelona - IDT-UAB
VAN DER TORRE, Leon ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Modeling relevant legal information for consumer disputes
Date de publication/diffusion :
septembre 2016
Nom de la manifestation :
5th International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective
Lieu de la manifestation :
Porto, Portugal
Date de la manifestation :
September 5-8, 2016
Titre de l'ouvrage principal :
EGOVIS 2016: Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective
Fernández-Barrera, M., Sartor, G.: The legal theory perspective: doctrinal conceptual systems vs. computational ontologies. In: Sartor, G., Casanovas, P., Biasiotti, M., Fernández-Barrera, M. (eds.) Approaches to Legal Ontologies, Theories, Domains, Methodologies. LGT Series, pp. 15-47. Springer, Amsterdam (2011)
Rodríguez-Doncel, V., et al.: A model of air transport passenger incidents and rights. In: Hoekstra, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the 27th JURIX, pp. 55-69. IOS Press (2014)
Cortés, P.: ODR for Consumers, ODR Methods for Settling B2C Conflicts, Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice: A Treatise on Technology and Dispute Resolution, p. 164. Eleven Law Publishing, Utrecht (2012)
Saracevic, T.: Relevance reconsidered, information science: integration in perspectives. In: Second Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, pp. 201–218 (1996)
Gruber, T.R.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 43, 907–928 (1995)
Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance. ASIS&T 58(3), 1915–1933 (2007)
Dabney, D.P.: The curse of Thamus: an analysis of full-text legal document retrieval. Law Libr. J. 78, 5–40 (1986)
Micklitz, H.-W., et al.: An introduction to the special issue on behavioural economics, consumer policy, and consumer law. JCP 34, 271–276 (2011)
Saravanan, M., et al.: Improving legal information retrieval using an ontological framework. Artif. Intell. Law 17, 101–124 (2009)
Jarrar, M.: Towards effectiveness and transparency in e-business transactions, an ontology for customer complaint management. In: Semantic Web Methodologies for E-Business Applications, pp. 127–149 (2007)
Bing, J.: Let there be LITE: a brief history of legal information retrieval. EJLT 1(1) (2010)
Blair, D., Maron, M.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text documentretrieval system. Commun. ACM 28(3), 289–299 (1985)
Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A. (eds.): Ontology Engineering in a Networked World. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernandez-Lopez, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering: with Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer, New York (2003)
Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Villazón-Terrazas, B.: How to write and use the ontology requirements specification document. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5871, pp. 966-982. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Dabney, D.P.: The curse of Thames: an analysis of full-text legal document retrieval. Law Libr. J. 78(5), 5–40 (1986)
Alvite, M.L.: Tendencias a la investigación sobre la recuperación de Información Jurídica. Revista española de Documentación Científica, vol. 26, no. 2 (2003)
Schweighofer, E.: The revolution in legal information retrieval or: the empire strikes back. J. Law Inf. Technol. 1 (1999)
Moens, M.F.: XML retrieval models for legislation. In: Legal Knowledge Systems JURIX, pp. 1–10 (2004)
Gelbart, D., Smith, J.C.: Toward a comprehensive legal information retrieval system. In: DEXA 1990, pp. 121–125 (1990)
Turtle, H.: Inference networks for document retrieval. Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Department Univ. Massachusetts, MA 01003, COINS Technical Report 90-92 (1990)
George, C.P., et al.: SMART Electronic Legal Discovery via Topic Modeling [URL]. FLAIRS-27, Pensacola, Florida, USA (2014)
Uschold, M., Gruninger, M., et al.: Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 11(2), 93–136 (1996)
Casanovas, P., Casellas, N., Vallbé, J.-J.: Empirically grounded developments of legal ontologies: a socio-legal perspective. In: Sartor, G., Casanovas, P., Biasiotti, M., Fernández-Barrera, M. (eds.) Approaches to Legal Ontologies. LGT Series, vol. 1, pp. 49-67. Springer, Amsterdam (2011)
Opijnen, M.V.: A model for automated rating of case law. In: ICAIL, pp. 140–149 (2013)
Terpan, F.: Soft law in the European union the changing nature of EU law. Eur. Law 21, 68–96 (2014). Wiley
Bench-Capon, T., Coenen, F.: Isomorphism and legal knowledge based systems. Artif. Intell. Law 1(1), 65–86 (1992)
Routen, T.: Hierarchically organised formalisations. In: Proceedings of the Second ICAIL. ACM Press, Vancouver, pp. 242–250 (1989)
Karpf, J.: Quality Assurance of Legal Expert Systems. Jurimatics, no. 2, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (1989)
Prakken, H., Schrickx, J.: Isomorphic models for rules and exceptions in legislation. In: Breuker, J.A.P.J., et al. (eds.) JURIX 91: Model-Based Legal Reasoning. Koninklijke Vermande, Lelystad, pp. 17–27 (1991)
Palmirani, M., Contissa, G., Rubino, R.: Fill the gap in the legal knowledge modelling. In: Governatori, G., Hall, J., Paschke, A. (eds.) RuleML 2009. LNCS, vol. 5858, pp. 305-314. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Sergot, M.J.: The representation of law in computer programs. In: Bench-Capon, T.J.M. (ed.) Knowledge Based Systems and Legal Applications, pp. 3-68. Academic Press (1991)
Gordon, T.F.: The Carneades web service. In: Verheij, B. (eds.) Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2012. IOS Press, pp. 517–518 (2012)
McCarthy, L.T.: Onwnership: a case study in the representation of legal concepts. AI&Law J. 10, 135–161 (2002)
Gruninger, M., Fox, M.S.: The role of competency questions in enterprise engineering. In: Rolstadås, A. (ed.) WG5.7 Workshop on Benchmarking -Theory and Practice. IFIP, pp. 22-31. Springer, New York (1994)
Uschold, M., King, M.: Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In: Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing (1995)
Poveda, M., et al.: Oops! (ontology pitfall scanner!): an on-line tool for ontology evaluation. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 10(2), 4–14 (2014)
Casanovas, P., et al.: The role of pragmatics in the web of data. In: Poggi, F., Capone, A. (eds.) Pragmatics and Law. Practical and Theoretical Approaches. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg (2016)
Gaines, B.R.: Knowledge acquisition: past, present and future. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 71, 135–156 (2013)
Boella, G., et al.: A critical analysis of legal requirements engineering from the perspective of legal practice. In: IEEE 7th International Workshop RELAW, pp. 14–21 (2014)
Benjamins, V.R., et al.: The SEKT legal use case components: ontology and architecture. In: Gordon, T. (ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2004, pp. 69-77. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)
