[en] When arguing, agents may want to discuss about the details after agreeing about the general problems. We propose to model this kind of situation using an extended argumentation framework with potential attacks. Agents negotiation about raising potential attacks or not, in order to maximize the number of their accepted arguments. The result of the negotiation process consists in the formation of coalitions composed by those agents which have found an agreement. The two proposed negotiation protocols have been implemented and an evaluation, addressed by means of experimental results, shows which combination of strategies and negotiation protocol allows the agents to optimize outcomes.
Disciplines :
Sciences informatiques
Identifiants :
UNILU:UL-CONFERENCE-2011-355
Auteur, co-auteur :
Boella, Guido
GABBAY, Dov M. ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
Perotti, Alan
VAN DER TORRE, Leon ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
Villata, Serena
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Argumentative Agents Negotiating on Potential Attacks
