Last 7 days
Bookmark and Share    
See detailHegemonic University Tales: Discussing Narrative Positioning within the Academic Field between Humboldtian and Managerial Governance
Lueg, Klarissa; Graf, Angela; Powell, Justin J W UL

in Lueg, Klarissa; Lundholt, Marianne (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Counter-Narratives. (in press)

This chapter observes and analyzes hegemonic narratives in and of the academic field. In particular, our focus is on normative and evaluative accounts relating to forms of university governance. We ... [more ▼]

This chapter observes and analyzes hegemonic narratives in and of the academic field. In particular, our focus is on normative and evaluative accounts relating to forms of university governance. We suggest centering on two overarching approaches to what is seen as legitimate in terms of governing the university. First, we trace the age-old Humboldtian perspective, representing especially professorial independence and self-governance. Second, we consider the newer managerial perspective, separating top-down university management decision-making separate from (or counter to) faculty influence. We find that, as the latter form is currently taking hold within European universities, scholarly remembrance of the former Humboldtian governance tradition has morphed into a nearly uncritical, hegemonic tale of a glorified past. In contrast, we suggest, the managerial perspective represents a powerful ante-narrative, a hegemonic story in-the-making. The morally laden, and somewhat fantastical, Humboldtian tale, being itself hegemonic, is unfit to serve as a critical counter-narrative vis-à-vis the managerial approach that has attained considerable authority. Thus, we argue that contemporary governance discourse is suspended between two poles: the Humboldtian perspective, favoring professorial power and authority relations, and the managerial perspective, subordinating faculty under market considerations and continuous evaluation. The dilemma arising from this “suspension” also renders the governance discourse into regions of impracticality and elitism. We argue that a counter-narrative fit to challenge the managerialist governance structures in practice is lacking, with elitism continuously reproduced in-between an ancient hegemonic narrative (Humboldtian) and equally hegemonic contemporary ante-narrative (managerialist). [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 20 (3 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detail§§ 53a bis 56 AktG zur Gleichbehandlung der Aktionäre und Nebenabreden mit Aktionären
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL

in Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas; Noack, Ulrich (Eds.) Kölner Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 8 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detail§§ 675u - 676c zur Haftung des Zahlungsdienstleisters, Münch. Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL

in Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas (Ed.) §§ 675u - 676c zur Haftung des Zahlungsdienstleisters, Münch. Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 8 (4 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detail§§ 325 bis 329 HGB zur Publizität der Rechnungslegung von Handelsgesellschaften
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL

in Rechnungslegungsrecht (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 9 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEuropäisches Kapitalmarktrecht: Intermediärsrecht (§ 13)
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL; Preiner, Christina

in Enzyklopädie des Europarechts, Europäisches Privat- und Unternehmensrecht, Band 6 (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 8 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEuropäisches Kapitalmarktrecht: Marktmissbrauchsrecht (§ 14)
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL

in Enzyklopädie des Europarechts, Europäisches Privat- und Unternehmensrecht, Band 6 (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEuropäisches Kapitalmarktrecht: Grundlagen (§ 12)
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL; Veidt, Robin UL

in Enzyklopädie des Europarechts, Europäisches Privat- und Unternehmensrecht, Band 6 (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (3 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEuropäisches Kapitalmarktrecht: Unternehmenskapitalmarktrecht (§ 15)
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL

in Enzyklopädie des Europarechts, Europäisches Privat- und Unternehmensrecht, Band 6 (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 12 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detail§§ 54 bis 57 WpHG betreffend Positionslimits und Positionsmanagementkontrollen bei Warenderivaten und Positionsmeldungen
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL; Lehmann, Mattias

in Kapitalmarktrechtskommentar (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 10 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEinleitung, §§ 4 -9, 16, 29 bis 39c, 59 bis 68 des Wertpapiererwerbs- und Übernahmegesetzes
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL; Noack, Ulrich

in Schwark; Zimmer (Eds.) Kapitalmarktrechtskommentar (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detail§ 53 WpHG betreffend Leerverkäufe
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL; Lehmann, Mattias

in Schwark; Zimmer (Eds.) Kapitalmarktrechtskommentar (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 5 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detail§§ 6 bis 15 WpHG betreffend die Eingriffsbefugnisse der BaFin und Positionskontrollen
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL; Lehmann, Mattias

in Schwark; Zimmer (Eds.) Kapitalmarktrechtskommentar (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (1 UL)
Full Text
See detailThe AIFM Directive– European Regulation of Alternative Investment Funds
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL

Book published by Kluwer Law International - 3rd ed. (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRegulating Libra
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL; Buckley; Arner

in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 32 (3 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe EU’s Future of Data-Driven Finance
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL; Buckley, Ross; Arner, Douglas et al

in Common Market Law Review (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 18 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe Dark Side of Digital Financial Transformation: The New Risks of FinTech and the Rise of TechRisk
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL; Arner, Douglas; Buckley, Ross

in Singapore Journal of Legal Studies (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 43 (4 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailSustainability, FinTech and Financial Inclusion
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL; Veidt, Robin UL; Buckley, Ross et al

in European Business Organization Law Review (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 41 (7 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe EU’s Impact on Data-driven Finance
Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas UL; Buckley, Ross; Arner, Douglas et al

in Common Market Law Review (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailAltered interoceptive awareness in high habitual symptom reporters and patients with somatoform disorders
Flasinski, Tabea; Dierolf, Angelika UL; Rost, Silke et al

in Frontiers in Psychology (in press)

Objective. Altered interoception may play a major role in the etiology of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). It remains unclear, however, if these alterations concerns noticing of signals or if they ... [more ▼]

Objective. Altered interoception may play a major role in the etiology of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). It remains unclear, however, if these alterations concerns noticing of signals or if they are limited to the interpretation of signals. We investigated whether individuals with MUS differ in interoceptive awareness as assessed with the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) questionnaire. Methods. Study 1: 486 individuals completed the Screening for Somatoform Disorders (SOMS-2). 32 individuals each of the upper and lower decile of the SOMS distribution (low symptom reporters/LSR, high symptom reporters/HSR) completed the MAIA. Study 2: MAIA scores of individuals diagnosed with somatoform disorder (SFD; n = 26) were compared to individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD; n = 25) and healthy controls (HC; n = 26). Results. HSR had lower scores than LSR on the MAIA scales Not-Distracting and Not-Worrying. The SFD and MDD groups showed lower scores than HC on the MAIA scales Not-Distracting, Self-Regulation, and Trusting. The MDD group scored lower than the other two groups on the scales Body Listening and Attention Regulation. There were no group differences on the scale Noticing. Conclusion. HSR, SFD and MDD patients do not differ from HC in the awareness of noticing of interoceptive signal processing, whereas cognitive facets of interoception, such as distraction or self-regulation are differentially affected. This highlights the necessity of including specifically targeted interventions, which improve interoceptive awareness, in the prevention and treatment of SFDs. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 27 (0 UL)