Results 1-20 of 98.
((uid:50002215))

Bookmark and Share    
See detailThe European Public Prosecutor’s Office
Ligeti, Katalin UL

in Mitsilegas, Valsamis; Bergström, Maria; Konstadinides, Theodore (Eds.) Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 20 (2 UL)
See detailEuropol
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Giuffrida, Fabio

in Ambos, Kai; Rackow, Peter (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law (2023)

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (1 UL)
See detailComposite Enforcement and Comprehensive Judicial Protection
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Robinson, Gavin

in Luchtman, Michiel; Ligeti, Katalin; Vervaele, John (Eds.) EU enforcement authorities - Punitive law enforcement in a composite legal order (2023)

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (2 UL)
See detailLe Parquet européen et le blanchiment de capitaux
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Constantinides, Panayiotis

in Marty, Marie; Kirmann, Florent (Eds.) Le droit criminel à l’épreuve de l’infraction de blanchiment (2023)

Detailed reference viewed: 18 (5 UL)
See detailIntroduction
Luchtman, Michiel; Ligeti, Katalin UL; Vervaele, John

in Luchtman, Michiel; Ligeti, Katalin; Vervaele, John (Eds.) EU enforcement authorities - Punitive law enforcement in a composite legal order (2023)

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (1 UL)
See detailEU enforcement authorities - Punitive law enforcement in a composite legal order
Luchtman, Michiel; Ligeti, Katalin UL; Vervaele, John

Book published by Bloomsbury Publishing (2023)

Detailed reference viewed: 35 (7 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailIntroduction (Enforcement Challenges in Multilevel Regulatory Systems)
Zinonos, Panagiotis UL; Ligeti, Katalin UL; Brodersen, Kei Hannah

in Ligeti, Katalin; Brodersen, Kei Hannah (Eds.) Studies on Enforcement in Multilevel Regulatory Systems (2022)

Detailed reference viewed: 22 (5 UL)
See detailStudies on Enforcement in Multilevel Regulatory Systems
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Brodersen, Kei Hannah

Book published by NOMOS (2022)

Detailed reference viewed: 36 (1 UL)
Full Text
See detailPractitioners' Handbook on the European Public Prosecutor's Office
Barletta, Amedeo; Bojić, Ines; Bonačić, Marin et al

Report (2022)

Detailed reference viewed: 51 (0 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailSword, Shield and Cloud: Toward a European System of Public-Private Orders for Electronic Evidence in Criminal Matters?
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Robinson, Gavin UL

in Mitsilegas, Valsamis; Vavoula, Niovi (Eds.) Surveillance and Privacy in the Digital Age: European, Transatlantic and Global Perspectives (2021)

Detailed reference viewed: 990 (26 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe Handling of Digital Evidence in Luxembourg
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Robinson, Gavin UL

in Caianiello, Michele; Camon, Albert (Eds.) Digital Forensic Evidence: Towards Common European Standards in Antifraud Administrative and Criminal Investigations (2021)

Detailed reference viewed: 188 (21 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe (Criminal) Liability of Legal Persons and Heads of Business: Strenghts and Weaknesses of the European Union's Approach
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Giuffrida, Fabio UL

in Revue Pénale Luxembourgeoise (2020), (5), 2-22

This article aims to analyse the current EU legal framework on the (criminal) liability of legal persons and heads of business, and discuss its strengths and weaknesses. The first section provides some ... [more ▼]

This article aims to analyse the current EU legal framework on the (criminal) liability of legal persons and heads of business, and discuss its strengths and weaknesses. The first section provides some introductory remarks on a recent cross-cutting trend in EU law, which affects both corporate and individual liability, namely the increasing blurring of boundaries between administrative and criminal law in the enforcement of financial and economic policy. The analysis then shifts to the EU rules on corporate (criminal) liability, before briefly discussing whether, in EU legislation, the attribution of liability to legal persons is accompanied by recognition of their procedural rights. Finally, this contribution examines the criminal liability of heads of business, by focusing on the field of the protection of the Union’s financial interests, which represents a useful case study to discuss the current EU approach. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 242 (12 UL)
See detailThe European Public Prosecutor’s Office at Launch. Adapting National Systems, Transforming EU Criminal Law
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Antunes, Maria João; Giuffrida, Fabio UL

Book published by Wolters Kluwer - CEDAM (2020)

In November 2017, Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘EPPO’) entered into force. The EPPO is a new body of ... [more ▼]

In November 2017, Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘EPPO’) entered into force. The EPPO is a new body of the European Union that will investigate and prosecute perpetrators of criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union. Being the first EU authority to exercise direct powers vis-à-vis individuals in the field of criminal law, the EPPO represents a paradigm shift in the EU criminal justice field and requires several amendments of national legislation. The Member States that take part in the EPPO enhanced cooperation are currently in the process of implementing the Regulation in order to make their criminal justice systems compatible with its provisions, and allow the EPPO to carry out its activities once the Office will be up and running. Building on the Symposium that took place in Coimbra on 29–30 March 2017, which was co-organised by the European Criminal Law Academic Network (ECLAN) and the Instituto Jurídico of the Law Faculty of the University of Coimbra, this book offers a comprehensive overview of crucial aspects of this ambitious and debated EU initiative, in both its European and national dimensions. It aims to analyse key issues related to the functioning and legitimacy of the EPPO from a European perspective, such as EPPO independence and material competence, judicial review of its acts, and protection of fundamental rights in the framework of EPPO proceedings. At the same time, it also represents the first publication that, in the wake of the Regulation’s adoption, discusses the challenges that the implementation of this EU legal instrument is currently raising in some Member States, namely Austria, Finland, Germany, Lithuania, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 841 (39 UL)
See detailIntroduction
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Antunes, Maria João; Giuffrida, Fabio UL

in Ligeti, Katalin; Antunes, Maria João; Giuffrida, Fabio (Eds.) The European Public Prosecutor’s Office at Launch. Adapting National Systems, Transforming EU Criminal Law (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 62 (5 UL)
See detailAdmissibility of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in the EU
Garamvölgyi, Balázs; Ligeti, Katalin UL; Ondrejová, Anna et al

in Eucrim (2020), (3), 201-208

Detailed reference viewed: 111 (9 UL)
See detailOverprosecution and Negotiated Justice in Europe
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Robinson, Gavin UL

in Van Kempen, Piet Hein (Ed.) Overuse in the Criminal Justice System: On Criminalization, Prosecution and Imprisonment (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 184 (9 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe Place of the Prosecutor in Common Law and Civil Law Jurisdictions
Ligeti, Katalin UL

in Brown, Darryl; Iontcheva Turner, Jenia; Weisser, Bettina (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process (2019)

This chapter focuses on the place of the public prosecutor in common law and civil law jurisdictions. It first describes the institutional positioning of public prosecutors, particularly vis-à-vis the ... [more ▼]

This chapter focuses on the place of the public prosecutor in common law and civil law jurisdictions. It first describes the institutional positioning of public prosecutors, particularly vis-à-vis the executive power, before discussing their role and powers in regard to the pretrial phase. It then considers the increasing tendency to entrust the public prosecutor with quasi-judicial sanctioning powers in the context of out-of-court procedures (“prosecutorial adjudication”). It also examines the role of specialized law enforcement authorities in the exercise of investigative and prosecutorial functions, coercive measures and the need for judicial authorization, and prosecutorial discretion and alternatives to trial proceedings. Finally, it explains how independence, centralization and decentralization, legality and opportunity of prosecution, and the alternatives to trial proceedings have been translated to the supranational design of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 565 (11 UL)