Results 41-60 of 62.
![]() ![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() Scientific Conference (2012) Detailed reference viewed: 42 (3 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() in Social Choice and Welfare (2012) Detailed reference viewed: 79 (3 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() E-print/Working paper (2012) Detailed reference viewed: 92 (3 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() E-print/Working paper (2012) Detailed reference viewed: 40 (2 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() E-print/Working paper (2012) Detailed reference viewed: 30 (1 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() E-print/Working paper (2011) Detailed reference viewed: 82 (2 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() in New Zealand Economic Papers (2011) Detailed reference viewed: 51 (2 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() E-print/Working paper (2010) Detailed reference viewed: 102 (9 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() E-print/Working paper (2010) Detailed reference viewed: 98 (4 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() E-print/Working paper (2010) Detailed reference viewed: 104 (2 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() E-print/Working paper (2010) Detailed reference viewed: 172 (1 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() in The Selten School of Behavioral Economics (2010) Detailed reference viewed: 82 (5 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() in Journal of Economic Psychology (2009) Detailed reference viewed: 31 (2 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() in Environmental and Resource Economics (2009) Detailed reference viewed: 26 (2 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() in Mohammed Abdellaboui and John D Hey (eds), Advances in Decision Making under Risk and Uncertainty, Theory and Decision Library C. Berlin: Springer (2008), 42 This article reports on simple individual choice experiments, in which subjects choose a lottery from a convex set involving dominated lotteries and perfect negative correlation between risky assets. All ... [more ▼] This article reports on simple individual choice experiments, in which subjects choose a lottery from a convex set involving dominated lotteries and perfect negative correlation between risky assets. All subjects’ choices obey to [violate] the dominance criterion when dominance is [not] transparent. Choices involve too much risk since subjects overlook covariances. The main result is that elicited preferences suggest a two-step boundedly rational diversification pattern: subjects allocate a share of their endowment risklessly and allocate the remainder extremely risky but losslessly. This pattern is in line with safety first theory and loss aversion theory, but contradicts both in choice. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 35 (2 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2008), 66 We study fairness and reciprocity in a Hawk–Dove Game. A variety of recent models gives the same predictions for this game. This allows us to provide a general classification of individuals’ types ... [more ▼] We study fairness and reciprocity in a Hawk–Dove Game. A variety of recent models gives the same predictions for this game. This allows us to provide a general classification of individuals’ types. Contrary to a large number of studies of different games over the last decade, we observe a large group of subjects behaving in a self-interested way and observe only little reciprocity. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 28 (2 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() E-print/Working paper (2008) Detailed reference viewed: 84 (1 UL)![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() E-print/Working paper (2007) Detailed reference viewed: 48 (3 UL)![]() ![]() Neugebauer, Tibor ![]() in Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (2007) Detailed reference viewed: 23 (5 UL)![]() ![]() Fatas, Enrique ![]() ![]() in Journal of Economics (2007), 32(2), 167-196 We report on an experimental study with real-world politicians. These political experts face political choice problems under risk and probability. Thus, we test the frequently observed violations of ... [more ▼] We report on an experimental study with real-world politicians. These political experts face political choice problems under risk and probability. Thus, we test the frequently observed violations of rational choice theory -the reference point effect, loss aversion, framing effects, and the common ratio effect- with experts from the field. Their choices violate expected utility theory. Nevertheless, they appear to be more rational and less risk averse (loving) in the domain of gains (losses) than student subjects. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 26 (3 UL) |
||