Publications of the CBA Research Group
![]() ![]() Franzen, Patrick ![]() ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2019, August) Detailed reference viewed: 93 (16 UL)![]() ![]() Niepel, Christoph ![]() ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2019, February) Detailed reference viewed: 44 (0 UL)![]() Hausen, Jennifer ![]() in British Journal of Guidance and Counselling (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 68 (1 UL)![]() Hausen, Jennifer ![]() in Amok an Schulen - Prävention, Intervention und Nachsorge bei School Shootings (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 69 (4 UL)![]() Krieger, Florian ![]() ![]() in Journal of Research in Personality (2019) The aim of this brief report was to replicate the meta-analytic findings concerning the relationship between Big-Five personality and political orientation reported in Sibley, Osborne, and Duckitt (2012 ... [more ▼] The aim of this brief report was to replicate the meta-analytic findings concerning the relationship between Big-Five personality and political orientation reported in Sibley, Osborne, and Duckitt (2012) in a sample of N = 29,015 participants from four panels involving representative German samples. We replicated the expected significant correlations for Openness to Experience (r = ?0.07; 95% CI [?0.10, ?0.05]) and Conscientiousness (r = 0.06, 95% CI [0.05, 0.08]), but the effect sizes were smaller than in Sibley et al. (2012). We also found significant correlations for Agreeableness (r = ?0.04; 95% CI [?0.05, ?0.03]) and Neuroticism (r = ?0.04; 95% CI [?0.06, ?0.02]), indicating small but significant relations of additional Big-Five dimensions on political orientation. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 213 (9 UL)![]() Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() ![]() in Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling (2019), 61 Detailed reference viewed: 71 (2 UL)![]() Stadler, Matthias ![]() ![]() ![]() in Intelligence (2019), 72 Detailed reference viewed: 72 (3 UL)![]() Niepel, Christoph ![]() ![]() ![]() in Journal of Educational Psychology (2019), 111(6), 1119-1130 Detailed reference viewed: 312 (17 UL)![]() Krieger, Florian ![]() ![]() in Intelligence (2019), 72 It is well documented that figural matrices tests are harder to solve when multiple rules need to be induced because multiple rules are traditionally associated with a greater demand for dynamically ... [more ▼] It is well documented that figural matrices tests are harder to solve when multiple rules need to be induced because multiple rules are traditionally associated with a greater demand for dynamically managed sub-goals (goal management), which requires more working memory capacity (WMC). The current research addresses the necessity to apply selective encoding as a requirement that goes beyond the ability to manage goals when solving figural matrices. In the first study (N = 38), we found that selective encoding demands are present in items with multiple rules in addition to goal management demands. Furthermore, eye movement data indicated that rule induction was hampered when selective encoding demands were present. The second study (N = 127) de-monstrated that individuals' ability to filter relevant features in working memory was positively related to figural matrices items with selective encoding demands. Moreover, there was no evidence that other sources of WMC are related to goal management in figural matrices. Hence, this study provides preliminary evidence that fil-tering of relevant information in working memory is critical for solving figural matrices with multiple rules and challenges the view that goal management is the only driver of the relationship between WMC and performance in solving figural matrices with multiple rules. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 146 (15 UL)![]() Mainert, Jakob ![]() ![]() in Journal of Business and Psychology (2019), 34 Detailed reference viewed: 134 (12 UL)![]() Niepel, Christoph ![]() ![]() in Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity (2019), 6 Detailed reference viewed: 127 (12 UL)![]() Greiff, Samuel ![]() in European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2019), 35 Detailed reference viewed: 38 (1 UL)![]() ; Niepel, Christoph ![]() in British Journal of Educational Psychology (2019), 89 Detailed reference viewed: 121 (5 UL)![]() Gottschling, Juliana ![]() in Intelligence (2019), 72 Detailed reference viewed: 154 (6 UL)![]() ; ; Gottschling, Juliana ![]() in Behavior Genetics (2019), 49(1), 24-48 Detailed reference viewed: 112 (3 UL)![]() ; Greiff, Samuel ![]() in European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2019), 35 Detailed reference viewed: 73 (4 UL)![]() Stadler, Matthias ![]() ![]() ![]() in Journal of Intelligence (2019), 7 Detailed reference viewed: 70 (4 UL)![]() Stadler, Matthias ![]() ![]() in Frontiers in Psychology (2019), 10 Detailed reference viewed: 34 (4 UL)![]() ; Greiff, Samuel ![]() in Journal of Dynamic Decision Making (2019), 5 Detailed reference viewed: 25 (1 UL)![]() ; Greiff, Samuel ![]() in European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2019), 35 Detailed reference viewed: 121 (0 UL) |
||