Publications of the CBA Research Group
Bookmark and Share    
Peer Reviewed
See detailMeasuring a cross-curricular skill: competence models and construct validity of dynamic problem solving
Greiff, Samuel UL; Wüstenberg, Sascha UL; Funke, Joachim

Scientific Conference (2011, April 07)

Detailed reference viewed: 53 (1 UL)
See detailDynamic Problem Solving: A new computer-based perspective for large-scale assessments
Greiff, Samuel UL; Funke, Joachim

Scientific Conference (2011, March 30)

Detailed reference viewed: 47 (1 UL)
See detailThe assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving in the context of MicroDYN and MicroFIN
Greiff, Samuel UL; Funke, Joachim; Wüstenberg, Sascha UL et al

Scientific Conference (2011, January 30)

Detailed reference viewed: 76 (1 UL)
See detailNicht-heterosexuelle Identitäten: Empirisch-psychologische Betrachtungen
Niepel, Christoph UL

in Schneider, M.; Diehl, M. (Eds.) Gender, Queer und Fetisch – Konstruktion von Identität und Begehren (2011)

Detailed reference viewed: 54 (2 UL)
See detailGeographische Kompetenzen fördern. Erfassung der Geographischen Systemkompetenz als Grundlage zur Bewertung der Kompetenzentwicklung
Viehrig, K.; Greiff, Samuel UL; Siegmund, A. et al

in Meyer, C.; Henry, R.; Stöber, G. (Eds.) Geographische Bildung: Kompetenzen in didaktischer Forschung und Schulpraxis (2011)

Detailed reference viewed: 89 (4 UL)
See detailChallenges of modern Computer Based Assessment: Usability, Scoring, and “Digital Natives”
Sonnleitner, Philipp UL; Brunner, Martin; Keller, Ulrich UL et al

Scientific Conference (2011)

In recent years, computer based assessment has undergone substantive change. Test developers as well as test users have become aware of the fact that computers can do more than administrate traditional ... [more ▼]

In recent years, computer based assessment has undergone substantive change. Test developers as well as test users have become aware of the fact that computers can do more than administrate traditional (paper-pencil) item formats like multiple-choice. More complex computer based item types allow tracking test takers’ mental representations of the problem or even their problem solving strategies by means of behavioral data. An example for such a modern item type are microworlds – dynamically changing problem solving scenarios with which the test taker has to interact. However, with the advent of complex item types, new challenges arise. First, usability is at stake - test takers do not intuitively know what to do or how to interact with complex tasks. Second, a massive load of data is produced and it gets difficult for the test developer to decide on relevant scores. Third, today’s students - so-called “digital natives”- grew up with computers and therefore set high quality standards for software applications. They may quickly loose trust and interest in tests with old fashioned design, cumbersome handling or even malfunctioning software. On basis of the Genetics Lab – a microworld developed to assess general mental ability – these challenges of modern computer based assessment are discussed. Three consecutive small scale studies were carried out to investigate usability issues, validate scoring algorithms and to ensure acceptance among students. The results demonstrate the importance of considering usability during the test development process, particularly with regard to scoring. The modification of conventional test development procedures for modern computer based assessment is suggested. Moreover, possibilities to satisfy even a critical target population are presented. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 83 (3 UL)
See detailDynamic systems and the theoretical concept of problem solving in PISA 2012
Greiff, Samuel UL; Funke, Joachim

Scientific Conference (2010, September 28)

Detailed reference viewed: 65 (1 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailBinnenstruktur und Validität: Minimal komplexe Probleme zur Diagnostik dynamischer Problemlösefähigkeit
Wüstenberg, Sascha UL; Greiff, Samuel UL; Funke, Joachim

Scientific Conference (2010, September 26)

Detailed reference viewed: 81 (1 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailStruktur und Entwicklung des akademischen Selbstkonzeptes bei Gymnasialschüler/innen: Eine längsschnittliche Modellierung
Niepel, Christoph UL; Preckel, Franzis

Scientific Conference (2010, September)

Detailed reference viewed: 63 (4 UL)
See detailKompetenzdiagnostik in der Bildungs- und Begleitforschung
Greiff, Samuel UL

Presentation (2010, August 23)

Detailed reference viewed: 60 (1 UL)
See detailDynamisches Problemlösen messbar gemacht: Der MicroDYN & MicroFIN-Ansatz
Wüstenberg, Sascha UL; Greiff, Samuel UL; Funke, Joachim

Presentation (2010, June 08)

Detailed reference viewed: 114 (1 UL)
See detailMeasuring dynamic problem solving: Recent developments in MicroDYN and MicroFIN
Greiff, Samuel UL; Funke, Joachim

Scientific Conference (2010, May 22)

Detailed reference viewed: 60 (0 UL)
See detailEffects of ability grouping of gifted students on academic self-concept
Niepel, Christoph UL; Preckel, Franzis

Scientific Conference (2010, May)

Detailed reference viewed: 63 (3 UL)
See detailDynamic Problem Solving: A New Perspective for Large-scale Assessments
Greiff, Samuel UL; Wüstenberg, Sascha UL; Funke, Joachim

Scientific Conference (2010, April 14)

Detailed reference viewed: 71 (0 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailGeographische Kompetenzen fördern. Erfassung der Geographischen Systemkompetenz als Grundlage zur Bewertung der Kompetenzentwicklung
Viehrig, K.; Greiff, Samuel UL; Siegmund, A. et al

Scientific Conference (2010, March 18)

Detailed reference viewed: 51 (0 UL)
See detailPISA switches to computer-based assessments: Chances that should not be missed
Greiff, Samuel UL

Presentation (2010, February 10)

Detailed reference viewed: 64 (0 UL)
See detailDynamic Problem Solving in large-scale assessments: Perspectives
Greiff, Samuel UL

Presentation (2010, February 09)

Detailed reference viewed: 51 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDo nightmares and generalized anxiety disorder in childhood and adolescence have a common genetic origin?
Coolidge, F.L.; Segal, D.L.; Coolidge, C.M. et al

in Behavior Genetics (2010), 40

Detailed reference viewed: 108 (2 UL)