Publications of the CBA Research Group
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
See detailWould you prefer your coefficients with a little bias, or rather with a lot of variance?
Fokkema, Marjolein; Greiff, Samuel UL

in European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2018), 34

Detailed reference viewed: 42 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailUnderstanding the link between need for cognition and complex problem solving
Rudolph, Julia UL; Greiff, Samuel UL; Strobel, Anja et al

in Contemporary Educational Psychology (2018), 55

With the aim of broadening the understanding of the nomological network of Complex Problem Solving (CPS), we investigated the link between CPS and Need for Cognition (NFC) while controlling for reasoning ... [more ▼]

With the aim of broadening the understanding of the nomological network of Complex Problem Solving (CPS), we investigated the link between CPS and Need for Cognition (NFC) while controlling for reasoning ability. Further, we explored whether the relation between NFC and CPS was mediated by test-taking behavior (i.e., exploration time). Using structural equation modeling, we analyzed data from 474 German seventh graders. We found (a) that NFC and CPS were positively related, (b) that this link was partially mediated by CPS exploration time, and (c) that the link between NFC and CPS that was partially mediated by exploration time remained substantial even after we controlled for reasoning. Altogether, these results provide new insights into how CPS and NFC are linked. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 181 (10 UL)
Full Text
See detailMaking use of data for assessments. Harnessing analytics and data science
Ifenthaler, D.; Greiff, Samuel UL; Gibson, D. C:

in Voogt, J.; Knezek, G.; Christensen, R. (Eds.) et al International handbook of IT in primary and secondary education (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 134 (5 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailStudents' exploration strategies in computer-simulated complex problem environments: A latent class approach
Greiff, Samuel UL; Molnár, Gyöngyvér; Martin, Romain UL et al

in Computers and Education (2018), 126

Complex problem solving (CPS) is considered an important educational achievement indicator. Previous research has indicated that CPS performance depends to a substantial extent on the way students explore ... [more ▼]

Complex problem solving (CPS) is considered an important educational achievement indicator. Previous research has indicated that CPS performance depends to a substantial extent on the way students explore problem environments. In this study, we investigated qualitative differences in the way students interact with such environments. In a sample of N = 2226 Hungarian students in Grades 6 to 8, we applied a latent class approach to investigate the use of the principle of isolated variation as an exploration strategy across six CPS tasks that were developed within the MicroDYN approach. Six qualitatively different class profiles emerged: proficient explorers, intermediate explorers, low-performing explorers, rapid learners, emerging explorers, and nonpersisting explorers. We further validated the profiles by comparing the latent classes with regard to students' overall CPS performance and additional indicators of task exploration. In analyzing age-related and gender differences on a cross-sectional level, we found only a small progression toward better performing class profiles from Grade 6 to Grade 8 (e.g., 14.6% of students in Grade 6 were proficient explorers vs. 24.6% in Grade 8; 27.1% of students in Grade 6 were low-performing explorers vs. 25.8% in Grade 8), and there were no substantial gender differences. This study contributes to the understanding of how students interact with complex problems and is the first to address whether variations in these behaviors indicate qualitatively different levels of strategic behavior. We discuss the theoretical underpinnings and potential of identifying class profiles of students' exploration behavior in the field of educational psychology. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 146 (8 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailAdvancing the science of collaborative problem solving
Graesser, Art; Fiore, Steve; Greiff, Samuel UL et al

in Psychological Science in the Public Interest (2018), 19

Detailed reference viewed: 112 (2 UL)
See detailComputer-based assessments in PISA. Challenges and potentials for research and policy
Greiff, Samuel UL; Johnson, Ashley

Speeches/Talks (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 44 (2 UL)
See detailNeues zu Prozessindikatoren. Von der Erklärung des Aufgabenerfolgs zum formative Assessment
Pucite, L.; Eichmann, B.; Naumann, J. et al

Speeches/Talks (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 48 (0 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailSelektives Enkodieren in figuralen Matrizen.
Krieger, Florian UL; Becker, Nicolas; Greiff, Samuel UL et al

Scientific Conference (2017, September)

Detailed reference viewed: 128 (4 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailKomplexes Problemlösen und Intelligenz
Greiff, Samuel UL

Scientific Conference (2017, September)

Detailed reference viewed: 39 (1 UL)
See detailProblem solving in PIAAC. Fundamentals and vision.
Greiff, Samuel UL

Speeches/Talks (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 36 (2 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailRelationship satisfaction: Establishing measurement and structural invariance across men with gay and straight identity
Emslander, Valentin UL; Niepel, Christoph UL; Kranz, Dirk et al

Poster (2017, September)

The Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS; Hendrick, 1988) is a widely employed, seven-item measure of relationship satisfaction. However, research on its measurement invariance across people differing in ... [more ▼]

The Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS; Hendrick, 1988) is a widely employed, seven-item measure of relationship satisfaction. However, research on its measurement invariance across people differing in their sexual orientation identity has yet to be conducted. Consequently, it is still an open question whether the RAS can be used for comparative research across gay and straight people. This study starts filling this gap in examining RAS' measurement invariance across gay and straight men. To this end, we drew on a sample of 644 German men (half gay/straight), who responded to the German-version RAS (Hassebrauck, 1991), which has been extensively validated and found to be equivalent to its English counterpart. A stepwise multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine configural, metric, and scalar invariance as well as the structural invariance of latent factor variances and means across groups. Configural, metric, and partial scalar measurement invariance (by freeing one item intercept) could be established, indicating that the RAS enables comparative research targeting variances and means. Further, structural invariance testing revealed non-invariant variances but invariant latent means across groups, indicating that gay and straight men's reported relationship satisfaction is equally high albeit differently distributed. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 56 (3 UL)