[en] The paper proposes a representation of the subsumption re-
lation and of count as conditional in the context of argument
ontologies. Starting from the weaker notion of classification
represented by the subsumption relation towards the stronger
notion of count as, we show how to reason whether an argu-
ment is accepted in ontologies involving these two notions.
We adopt the methodology of meta-argumentation in order
to model the design decisions. Argumentation, being able to
handle contradictory information, is proposed as technique to
reason about count as for ontology interoperability.
Disciplines :
Sciences informatiques
Identifiants :
UNILU:UL-CONFERENCE-2011-081
Auteur, co-auteur :
Boella, Guido; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
GABBAY, Dov M. ; King’s College London, Department of Computer Science, London, UK
Villata, Serena
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Subsumption and Count as Relation in Arguments Ontologies
Date de publication/diffusion :
2010
Nom de la manifestation :
Procs. of the 13th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR'10)
Date de la manifestation :
2010
Titre du périodique :
Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR'10)
