Reference : Subsumption and Count as Relation in Arguments Ontologies |
Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a journal | |||
Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science | |||
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/15941 | |||
Subsumption and Count as Relation in Arguments Ontologies | |
English | |
Boella, Guido [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >] | |
Gabbay, Dov M. [King’s College London, Department of Computer Science, London, UK] | |
Villata, Serena [> >] | |
2010 | |
Procs. of the 13th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR'10) | |
Yes | |
Procs. of the 13th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR'10) | |
2010 | |
[en] The paper proposes a representation of the subsumption re-
lation and of count as conditional in the context of argument ontologies. Starting from the weaker notion of classification represented by the subsumption relation towards the stronger notion of count as, we show how to reason whether an argu- ment is accepted in ontologies involving these two notions. We adopt the methodology of meta-argumentation in order to model the design decisions. Argumentation, being able to handle contradictory information, is proposed as technique to reason about count as for ontology interoperability. | |
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/15941 |
File(s) associated to this reference | ||||||||||||||
Fulltext file(s):
| ||||||||||||||
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.