Paper published in a journal (Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings)
Subsumption and Count as Relation in Arguments Ontologies
Boella, Guido; GABBAY, Dov M.; Villata, Serena
2010In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR'10)
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
nmr10.pdf
Publisher postprint (744.37 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] The paper proposes a representation of the subsumption re- lation and of count as conditional in the context of argument ontologies. Starting from the weaker notion of classification represented by the subsumption relation towards the stronger notion of count as, we show how to reason whether an argu- ment is accepted in ontologies involving these two notions. We adopt the methodology of meta-argumentation in order to model the design decisions. Argumentation, being able to handle contradictory information, is proposed as technique to reason about count as for ontology interoperability.
Disciplines :
Computer science
Identifiers :
UNILU:UL-CONFERENCE-2011-081
Author, co-author :
Boella, Guido;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
GABBAY, Dov M. ;  King’s College London, Department of Computer Science, London, UK
Villata, Serena
Language :
English
Title :
Subsumption and Count as Relation in Arguments Ontologies
Publication date :
2010
Event name :
Procs. of the 13th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR'10)
Event date :
2010
Journal title :
Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR'10)
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Available on ORBilu :
since 10 March 2014

Statistics


Number of views
48 (2 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
41 (0 by Unilu)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu