![]() Brüll, Christoph ![]() in Contemporanea (2019), XXXVIII(3), Detailed reference viewed: 108 (2 UL)![]() Venken, Machteld ![]() in Journal of Borderlands Studies (2019), 35(1), 165166 Detailed reference viewed: 49 (1 UL)![]() Sagrillo, Damien ![]() in IGEB Mitteilungsblatt (2019), 2019(2 / Spring), 4 The author, Karlheinz Weber is one of only a few orchestral musicians and teachers who also approaches his instrument scientifically. The book, a reference work, has now been published in its fifth ... [more ▼] The author, Karlheinz Weber is one of only a few orchestral musicians and teachers who also approaches his instrument scientifically. The book, a reference work, has now been published in its fifth edition. The subdivision into three main chapters is logically coherent. With 148 pages, the most comprehensive first chapter deals with the trombone’s development in a broad historical context, beginning with Ancient Egypt. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 255 (3 UL)![]() Pause, Johannes ![]() in MEDIENwissenschaft: Rezensionen, Reviews (2019), 1(2019), 24-27 Detailed reference viewed: 341 (3 UL)![]() Dusdal, Jennifer ![]() in Comparative Education (2019), 55(2), 292-294 Detailed reference viewed: 176 (7 UL)![]() Kmec, Sonja ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2019), 71(2), 245 Detailed reference viewed: 62 (0 UL)![]() Krebs, Stefan ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2019), 71(2), 246-247 Detailed reference viewed: 89 (1 UL)![]() Brüll, Christoph ![]() in Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire (2019), 97(2), 649-650 Detailed reference viewed: 31 (1 UL)![]() Cuniberti, Gilles ![]() in Revue Critique de Droit International Privé (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 54 (2 UL)![]() Kohns, Oliver ![]() in Germanistik : Internationales Referatenorgan mit bibliographischen Hinweisen (2019), 60(1-2), 410 Detailed reference viewed: 34 (0 UL)![]() Kmec, Sonja ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2019), 71(2), 248-250 Detailed reference viewed: 67 (3 UL)![]() Hofmann, Frank ![]() ![]() in Grazer Philosophische Studien (2019), 96(2), Detailed reference viewed: 39 (1 UL)![]() Barthelmebs-Raguin, Hélène ![]() in Acta Fabula: Revue des Parutions en Théorie Littéraire (2019), 20(3), Detailed reference viewed: 109 (2 UL)![]() Carr, Constance ![]() in disP : The Planning Review (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 111 (10 UL)![]() Kmec, Sonja ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2019), 71(4), 501-503 Detailed reference viewed: 41 (0 UL)![]() Binsfeld, Andrea ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2019), 71(2019), 359-360 Detailed reference viewed: 123 (1 UL)![]() Binsfeld, Andrea ![]() in Latomus: Revue d'Études Latines (2019), 78 Detailed reference viewed: 41 (1 UL)![]() Kohns, Oliver ![]() in Literaturkritik.de (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 67 (2 UL)![]() Steveker, Lena ![]() in Journal for the Study of British Cultures (2019), 26(1), 221-223 Detailed reference viewed: 61 (8 UL)![]() Roelens, Nathalie ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2019), 71(3), 376-378 Detailed reference viewed: 74 (8 UL)![]() Moreau, Sebastien ![]() in Vingtième Siècle (2019), (2), 190-191 Detailed reference viewed: 69 (6 UL)![]() Pauly, Michel ![]() in Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung (2018), 45(3), 507-509 Detailed reference viewed: 82 (2 UL)![]() Brüll, Christoph ![]() in Sehepunkte (2018), (7/8), Detailed reference viewed: 271 (4 UL)![]() Danescu, Elena ![]() in Journal of European Integration History (2018) Ce texte receille des notes de lecture critiques relatives à l'analyse interdisciplinaire réalisée par Michel Aglietta et Nicolas Lerron dans leur ouvrage « La double démocratie. Une Europe politique pour ... [more ▼] Ce texte receille des notes de lecture critiques relatives à l'analyse interdisciplinaire réalisée par Michel Aglietta et Nicolas Lerron dans leur ouvrage « La double démocratie. Une Europe politique pour la croissance », récemment publié aux Éditions du Seuil. Les auteurs placent leur analyse dans une perspective historique, avec l’objectif d’expliquer pourquoi l’Europe est plus vulnérable que les autres région du monde et d’identifier les moyens de donner de nouvelles impulsions au projet européen. Le constat des auteurs est sans appel : l’Union européenne et la zone euro sont aujourd’hui en impasse. Parmi les principales causes, ils identifient l’impuissance publique, les interdépendances négatives entre les États membres et le caractère incomplet de l’UEM. Ils mettent également en lumière une crise de la méthode de l’intégration européenne, vu que le postulat de l’engrenage, ou encore celui des petits pas prôné par Jean Monnet semblent avoir épuisé toutes leurs potentialités. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 172 (10 UL)![]() Van Der Walt, Johan Willem Gous ![]() in Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory (2018), 25(2), 304-308 Detailed reference viewed: 179 (22 UL)![]() Duhr, Marlène ![]() in IGEB Mitteilungsblatt (2018), (1), Detailed reference viewed: 238 (4 UL)![]() Ruppert, Christine ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2018), 70(1), 105-108 Detailed reference viewed: 379 (2 UL)![]() Ruppert, Christine ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2018), 70(1), 103-105 Detailed reference viewed: 119 (1 UL)![]() Sagrillo, Damien ![]() in IGEB Mitteilungsblatt (2018), 1-2(2018), 20-22 Detailed reference viewed: 183 (6 UL)![]() Danescu, Elena ![]() in The Journal of European Economic History (2018) Robert Triffin (1911-1993), a Belgian-born economist who spent much of his career in America, had a major influence on 20th-century economic thinking. He is particularly known for his monetary approach ... [more ▼] Robert Triffin (1911-1993), a Belgian-born economist who spent much of his career in America, had a major influence on 20th-century economic thinking. He is particularly known for his monetary approach. His intellectual legacy revolves ariund the 'Triffin dilemma' or 'Triffin paradox'. Triffin accurately predicted the end of the Bretton Woods system, though not for the right reasons. Triffin stuck by his monetary theory that it was much harder to achieve sound international economic management with flexible exchange rates and that best practices were by no means a guarantee of global stability if they were not accompanied by genuine international coordination. Triffin was also a committed European. He was close to Jean Monnet and Pierre Werner and worked alongside them from the early 1960's onwards in favour of European monetary integration. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 162 (7 UL)![]() Pauly, Michel ![]() in Francia-Recencensio (2018), 2018(1), Detailed reference viewed: 97 (7 UL)![]() Pauly, Michel ![]() in Speculum (2018), 93(2), 518 Detailed reference viewed: 93 (2 UL)![]() Danescu, Elena ![]() in The Journal of European Economic History (2018) The past few years have been a bleak period for Europe, dominated by the effects of a multidimensional systemic crisis (economic, financial, social, environmental and geopolitical), growing unease among ... [more ▼] The past few years have been a bleak period for Europe, dominated by the effects of a multidimensional systemic crisis (economic, financial, social, environmental and geopolitical), growing unease among the general public and considerable turmoil among political elites. The aggressive rise of populism, the slow slide towards authoritarianism and the surge in nationalism have led to parochial tendencies, an erosion of solidarity and a growing ambivalence about the future of the shared European project. At the same time, in today’s globalised environment, the limits of the traditional economic model have become apparent as it grapples with the effects of “secular stagnation". A new paradigm is emerging, based on the importance of global public goods, of what is “common” to humanity, despite the divisions that seem to be driving it apart. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 115 (6 UL)![]() Hesse, Markus ![]() in DISP Dokumente und Informationen zur Schweizerischen Orts-, Regional- und Landesplanung (2018), 54(212/1), 76 Detailed reference viewed: 81 (5 UL)![]() Dönges, Christa Annette ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2018), 70(1), 118-121 Detailed reference viewed: 346 (5 UL)![]() Kohns, Oliver ![]() in Literaturkritik.de (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 60 (0 UL)![]() Ehrhart, Sabine ![]() in Vox Romanica (2018), 77 Detailed reference viewed: 81 (0 UL)![]() Brüll, Christoph ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2018), (3), 123-124 Detailed reference viewed: 64 (2 UL)![]() Ehrhart, Sabine ![]() in Vox Romanica (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 161 (0 UL)![]() Ehrhart, Sabine ![]() in Vox Romanica (2018), 77 Detailed reference viewed: 80 (1 UL)![]() Bronec, Jakub ![]() in Marginalia Historica : Časopis pro Dějiny Vzdělanosti a Kultury (2018), 4(1), 190 Detailed reference viewed: 56 (6 UL)![]() Ehrhart, Sabine ![]() in Vox Romanica (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 149 (3 UL)![]() Hiez, David ![]() in Revue Internationale de l'Économie Sociale: Recma (2018), 348 Detailed reference viewed: 30 (0 UL)![]() Thiltges, Sébastian ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2018), 1 Detailed reference viewed: 73 (2 UL)![]() Uhrmacher, Martin ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2018), 70(4), 109-110 Detailed reference viewed: 52 (2 UL)![]() Bendheim, Amelie ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2018), 9(1), 197-199 Detailed reference viewed: 90 (1 UL)![]() Wong, Catherine ![]() in Risk Analysis : An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis (2018), In Press In a so-called “Post-truth” era, the role of facts in society has become ever more ambiguous and contentious. Increasingly, facts are simultaneously used as a tool for risk assessment and risk management ... [more ▼] In a so-called “Post-truth” era, the role of facts in society has become ever more ambiguous and contentious. Increasingly, facts are simultaneously used as a tool for risk assessment and risk management on the one hand, and an instrument of politicking and social polarisation on the other. That facts are subjective artefacts is not new. Pioneering sociologists like Emile Durkheim (Durkheim, 1996), Michel Foucault (Foucault, 2008, Burchell et al., 1991), and the Frankfurt School (Nicholas, 2012) (to name a few), have ruminated over the subjectivities of knowledge more than a century ago. But the difference in our current modern, hyper-globalised world is that the subjective nature of facts are increasingly both the best tool we have to deal with global risk, and a prime source of global risk at the same time. The question this raises, is how to deal with this paradox in policy? And is cooperation possible without consensus on whose facts are more true? [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 134 (1 UL)![]() van de Maele, Jens ![]() in Contemporanea (2018), (1), Detailed reference viewed: 208 (2 UL)![]() Schulz, Christian ![]() in Francia-Recensio (2018), 2018(3), 1-3 Detailed reference viewed: 77 (1 UL)![]() Busch, Christopher ![]() in Scientia Poetica (2018), 22 Detailed reference viewed: 236 (0 UL)![]() Krebs, Stefan ![]() in Zeitschrift für Unternehmensgeschichte (2018), 63(1), 180-181 Detailed reference viewed: 94 (7 UL)![]() Hofmann, Herwig ![]() in Die Verwaltung (2018), 51 Detailed reference viewed: 118 (6 UL)![]() Kmec, Sonja ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2018), 70(2), 125-126 Detailed reference viewed: 131 (6 UL)![]() Binsfeld, Andrea ![]() in Historische Zeitschrift (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 66 (1 UL)![]() van de Maele, Jens ![]() in Contemporanea (2018), (4), Detailed reference viewed: 58 (0 UL)![]() Krebs, Stefan ![]() in Technikgeschichte (2018), 85(3), 235-236 Detailed reference viewed: 128 (7 UL)![]() Sacher, Martin ![]() in Regional and Federal Studies (2018), 28(1), 102-105 Detailed reference viewed: 122 (27 UL)![]() Powell, Justin J W ![]() in Comparative Education Review (2018), 62(3), 451-454 By and large, we take our universities for granted. Indeed, the oldest have outlived political regimes of all kinds. This stimulating historical and comparative study exemplifies the importance of in ... [more ▼] By and large, we take our universities for granted. Indeed, the oldest have outlived political regimes of all kinds. This stimulating historical and comparative study exemplifies the importance of in-depth experience and engagement with the cultural and structural environments in which some of the world’s greatest universities have over centuries incrementally developed and been embedded. This is crucial if we hope to understand the sources of their authority and myriad contributions to scientific knowledge and human flourishing. A neo-institutionalist scholar and multicultural citizen who fruitfully contributes to dialogues exploring core institutions in education and society on both sides of the Atlantic, Heinz-Dieter Meyer is uniquely placed to grapple with the complex processes of institutional learning and design that have made the German and American universities among the globally most productive. He also shows how they have influenced each other via the complex, yet crucial flows of inspired scholars and students carrying key idea(l)s with them for interpretation and application back home. The contributions of key actors, but also the outcomes of choices at critical junctures, such as the failure to establish a national state-funded university in the United States, take center stage in this engaging account of how the leaders of American universities adapted the German model, joining diverse concepts to design what has become the greatest uni-versity system in the world, yet one that remains nearly impossible to emulate due to the unique constellation of actors and institutional environment in which it developed. In eighteen chapters in four parts, The Design of the University: German, American, and “World Class” takes us from Göttingen and Berlin to Boston and to the world level as the scientific enterprise—and competition between scientists and the most crucial organizational form in which they conduct their experiments and make their arguments, the research university—becomes ever more global. Contributing to and inviting debate, Meyer’s main argument is that the American university has suc-ceeded based upon an institutional design—or, perhaps, a non-design—that on multiple levels facil-itates self-government and the identification of a niche within an extraordinarily large and differen-tiated higher education system. This is not a full-fledged historiographic treatment of a subject fa-vored by academics (permanently searching for reputational gains) and policymakers (as they in-creasingly launch research funding programs and evaluation systems to foster competition). Rather than a full-fledged sociology of science, this book creatively sketches the trajectories of German and American university development, emphasizing affinities as well as crucial differences, to ulti-mately argue that in fact “Humboldt’s most important ideas flourished in the American atmosphere of unrestricted institutional experimentation and vigorous self-government” (xiii). Interrogating what he calls the “design thinking” of eminent thinkers Adam Smith and Wilhelm von Humboldt, among others, Meyer traces the challenging, complex, and contingent learning processes in the adaptation of the German research university model to the American context, eventually becoming the most differentiated and “world-class” higher education system in the world. Asking about the reasons for the American university’s success, especially in comparison to the recent insti-tutional crisis of the German research university, albeit still extraordinarily productive, Meyer argues that this American meritocratic success story has institutional design (of self-government) at its heart. Enjoying the patronage of not one, but three major institutions—state, church, and market—the American university attained true autonomy and global preeminence through unparalleled wealth of patronage and an intricate system of checks and balances. In this line of argument, chart-ing the ascendancy from humble origins of what can hardly be called a system due its extraordinary diversity, Meyer concurs with David Labaree (2017), who’s A Perfect Mess [1] is a highly-suitable com-panion piece grounded in the history of American higher education. Contemporary architects of higher education policy globally, driven by the fantasy of “world class” labels, Meyer warns, have completely underestimated the “institutional, social, and political prerequisites that excellence in research and teaching require” (p. 4). Meyer begins his treatise, appropriately, in Göttingen, the site of Georgia Augusta University, where many leaders of American higher education, first and foremost Boston Brahmin George Ticknor, learned by doing, ensconced in a cosmopolitan center of learning and intellectual enlightenment. The blueprint included professionalized scholarship, the unification of research and teaching in seminars and lectures, freedom to choose among academic offerings, a vast library of scientific knowledge, and academic standing based on perpetual production of cutting-edge research judged by peers (p. 19). Instead of Adam Smith’s preferred instruments of competition, choice, and tuition-dependence, Wilhelm von Humboldt’s “design revolution” proposed “three unities” whose powerful integration could surpass the utilitarian logic prevalent then and now: “teaching and research; scien-tific discovery and moral formation (Bildung); scholarly autonomy and scholarly community” (p. 40). The book’s second part, on institutional learning, charts the institutional migration of the blueprint; the contested design options of Gymnasium, college, and graduate school (the latter ultimately the key to global preeminence); the lasting influence of Protestantism (here Meyer follows the arguments of Max Weber, Robert K. Merton, and Joseph Ben-David) and extraordinary educational philanthropy; the battle between those who would centralize, by establishing a national university, and those committed to local control; and finally the contrasting answers to the eternal question of vocational-ism—e.g., how should business be treated, as a sibling to medicine and law or as their distant cousin? The more education-enamored, democratically-inclined patrician elites of the American East Coast were, Meyer argues, radically different institution-builders than German scholars, French state nobility, or even Chinese mandarins: “No other class combined their respect for, and grand vision of, the civilizing role of learning with their economic resources and the realism needed to put their plans into practice” (p. 113). Building on philosophical and historical elaboration, the book’s third part on achieving self-government discusses the six American moves leading to institutional innovation. At organizational level, the German chair and institute give way to departments and discipline, the university presi-dent is no longer figurehead but chief executive, and independent boards of trustees, not govern-ment officials, have ultimate authority. The implications for individuals and organizations of these “design shifts” cannot be overstated. Anyone seeking to understand American higher education, with its phenomenal vertical and horizontal differentiation and on-going academic drift (“a snake-like procession” as David Riesman, to whom the book is dedicated, calls it), and its self-organized autonomy—supported by many philanthropists without the limiting control of a few state bureau-crats—will find this analysis illuminating. Embedded in civil society, “vigorous self-government is the historic design contribution of the American university” (p. 209)—and an achievement that must be guarded in an era in which university autonomy is at risk. In concluding, Meyer’s American opti-mistic and laudatory tone shifts back to Germanic critique and foreboding, identifying challenges and the contemporary struggles that threaten the unintentional masterpiece of institutional learning and diversity. Such justified hopes and fears must now give way to empirical studies of the extraor-dinary outputs in terms of scientific production and societal capabilities and well-being brought about by the continuous process of university Bildung—in Germany, the United States, and around the world. [1] David Labaree (2017), A Perfect Mess: The Unlikely Ascendancy of American Higher Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 204 (9 UL)![]() Ehrhart, Sabine ![]() in Frankreich-Forum (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 167 (1 UL)![]() Hu, Adelheid ![]() in Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen (2018), 47(Heft 1), 127-129 Detailed reference viewed: 322 (5 UL)![]() Pause, Johannes ![]() in MEDIENwissenschaft: Rezensionen, Reviews (2018), (2/3), 220-221 Detailed reference viewed: 99 (1 UL)![]() Binsfeld, Andrea ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2018), 66 Detailed reference viewed: 219 (2 UL)![]() Kmec, Sonja ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2018), 70(1), 132-134 Detailed reference viewed: 59 (0 UL)![]() Krebs, Stefan ![]() in Technikgeschichte (2018), 85(2), 136 Detailed reference viewed: 71 (6 UL)![]() Paraschivescu, Claudia ![]() in Migraciones (2017), (42), 151-153 Detailed reference viewed: 83 (7 UL)![]() Pauly, Michel ![]() in Revue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne (2017), http://ifha.revues.org/8811 Detailed reference viewed: 391 (1 UL)![]() Vomacka, Eloïse ![]() in Hemecht : Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte = Revue d'Histoire Luxembourgeoise (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 78 (2 UL)![]() Heinen, Andreas ![]() ![]() in Erziehungswissenschaftliche Revue (2017), 16(3), Detailed reference viewed: 230 (17 UL)![]() Hesse, Markus ![]() in Local Environment (2017), 22(6), 784-785 Detailed reference viewed: 163 (0 UL)![]() Venken, Machteld ![]() in Slavonic and East European Review (2017), 95 Detailed reference viewed: 15 (0 UL)![]() Genot, Gilles ![]() in Hemecht : Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte = Revue d'Histoire Luxembourgeoise (2017), 69(1), 123-124 Detailed reference viewed: 119 (2 UL)![]() Mersch, Sam ![]() in Zeitschrift für Balkanologie (2017), 53/2 Detailed reference viewed: 308 (0 UL)![]() ![]() Thiltges, Sébastian ![]() in Local Environment (2017), 22(7), 906-908 Detailed reference viewed: 98 (0 UL)![]() Harnoncourt, Julia ![]() in Zeitschrift für historische Studien (2017), 16(1), Detailed reference viewed: 115 (2 UL)![]() Vomacka, Eloïse ![]() in Revue d'Histoire Ecclésiastique (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 140 (0 UL)![]() Harnoncourt, Julia ![]() in Global Labour Journal (2017), 8(3), Detailed reference viewed: 29 (1 UL)![]() Honig, Michael-Sebastian ![]() in Erziehungswissenschaftliche Revue (2017), 16(4), Detailed reference viewed: 750 (4 UL)![]() Brüll, Christoph ![]() in Journal of Belgian History (2017), 48(2/3), 259-262 Detailed reference viewed: 453 (3 UL)![]() Steveker, Lena ![]() in Symbolism (2017), 17 Detailed reference viewed: 13 (0 UL)![]() Uhrmacher, Martin ![]() in Mitteilungen des Instituts für Osterreichische Geschichtsforschung (2017), 125(2), 417-419 Detailed reference viewed: 142 (0 UL)![]() Küpper, Achim ![]() in Arbitrium: Zeitschrift fuer Rezensionen zur germanistischen Literaturwissenschaft (2017), 35(1), 117-119 Detailed reference viewed: 98 (2 UL)![]() Oesch, Lucas ![]() in Antipode (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 107 (9 UL)![]() Binsfeld, Andrea ![]() in Hemecht: Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte (2017), 65 Detailed reference viewed: 177 (1 UL)![]() Taylor Aiken, Gerald ![]() in Local Environment (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 149 (3 UL)![]() Krebs, Stefan ![]() in Hemecht : Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte = Revue d'Histoire Luxembourgeoise (2017), 69(3/4), 472-474 Detailed reference viewed: 112 (22 UL)![]() Neframi, Eleftheria ![]() in Annuaire de Droit Européen (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 140 (2 UL)![]() Uhrmacher, Martin ![]() in Mitteilungen des Instituts für Osterreichische Geschichtsforschung (2017), 125(2), 417-419 Detailed reference viewed: 144 (10 UL)![]() Barthelmebs-Raguin, Hélène ![]() in Le français à l’université (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 87 (3 UL)![]() Neframi, Eleftheria ![]() in Annuaire de Droit Européen (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 70 (6 UL)![]() Epping, Elisabeth ![]() in Zeitschrift Hochschule und Weiterbildung (2017), 2 Detailed reference viewed: 73 (4 UL)![]() Kmec, Sonja ![]() in Hemecht : Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte = Revue d'Histoire Luxembourgeoise (2017), 69(1), 114-115 Detailed reference viewed: 74 (2 UL)![]() Schmid, Benedikt ![]() in Local Environment (2017), 22(7), 908-910 Detailed reference viewed: 164 (1 UL)![]() Glesener, Jeanne ![]() in Germanistik : Internationales Referatenorgan mit Bibliographischen Hinweisen (2017), 58(1-2), 123-124 Detailed reference viewed: 232 (2 UL)![]() Camarda, Sandra ![]() in Hemecht : Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte = Revue d'Histoire Luxembourgeoise (2017), 69(1), 129-130 Detailed reference viewed: 57 (7 UL)![]() Nabilou, Hossein ![]() in Banking & Finance Law Review (2016), 32(1), 203-207 Detailed reference viewed: 84 (11 UL)![]() Jeusette, Julien ![]() in Acta Fabula: Revue des Parutions en Théorie Littéraire (2016), 17(4), Detailed reference viewed: 122 (6 UL)![]() Pauly, Michel ![]() in Hemecht : Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte = Revue d'Histoire Luxembourgeoise (2016), 68(3), Detailed reference viewed: 94 (1 UL)![]() Kohns, Oliver ![]() in Literaturkritik.de (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 126 (2 UL) |
||