![]() Chiara, Pier Giorgio ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2022), 8(1), 103-107 This contribution highlights how the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/30 - activating the essential requirements of Article 3(3)(d), (e) and (f) of Directive 2014/53/EU on radio equipment (RED) - will ... [more ▼] This contribution highlights how the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/30 - activating the essential requirements of Article 3(3)(d), (e) and (f) of Directive 2014/53/EU on radio equipment (RED) - will enhance and complement existing cybersecurity and privacy & data protection EU legal frameworks while strengthening the (cyber)security of wireless (IoT) devices. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 125 (3 UL)![]() Cole, Mark David ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2022), 8(1), 73-77 Detailed reference viewed: 15 (0 UL)![]() Cole, Mark David ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(4), 560-563 Detailed reference viewed: 19 (1 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), (4), 580-585 Detailed reference viewed: 52 (3 UL)![]() Cole, Mark David ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(3), 413-415 Detailed reference viewed: 28 (0 UL)![]() Cole, Mark David ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(2021), 217-220 Detailed reference viewed: 22 (0 UL)![]() Chiara, Pier Giorgio ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(1), 18-30 The paper examines the normative challenges of the Internet of Things (IoT), in particular, taking into account today’s debate on privacy, data protection, and security issues brought about by IoT. Three ... [more ▼] The paper examines the normative challenges of the Internet of Things (IoT), in particular, taking into account today’s debate on privacy, data protection, and security issues brought about by IoT. Three different layers of complexity are under scrutiny. They regard (i) moral and political theories on the concept of ‘security’; (ii) whether and to what extent information security technologies, in the context of IoT, may affect fundamental rights, such as privacy and data protection; and, (iii) new legal challenges for individual and group privacy and data protection. The overall aim of the paper is, on the one hand, to stress basic differences between privacy and data protection and why the distinction matters vis-à-vis the flow of information and data sharing on IoT. On the other hand, the intent is to stress the different meanings security has in this context, since the word is often used interchangeably to address information security, cybersecurity, or safety issues. We should take these distinctions firm, when striking balances between privacy, data protection, and ‘security’ on IoT. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 215 (2 UL)![]() Cole, Mark David ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(1), 91-93 Detailed reference viewed: 13 (0 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(1), 101-107 Detailed reference viewed: 57 (5 UL)![]() Cole, Mark David ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2020), 6(1), 94-97 Detailed reference viewed: 31 (2 UL)![]() Cole, Mark David ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2020), 6(4), 549-553 Detailed reference viewed: 50 (0 UL)![]() Cole, Mark David ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2020), 6(3), 422-423 Detailed reference viewed: 27 (0 UL)![]() Cole, Mark David ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2020), 6(2), 259-261 Detailed reference viewed: 32 (0 UL)![]() Quintel, Teresa Alegra ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4/2018(4), 470-482 This contribution assesses data protection concerns relating to the processing of personal data carried out pursuant to Article 20 of the interoperability proposals, which were published by the European ... [more ▼] This contribution assesses data protection concerns relating to the processing of personal data carried out pursuant to Article 20 of the interoperability proposals, which were published by the European Commission on 12 December 2017. The proposals seek to enable all centralised EU databases for security, border and migration management to be interconnected by 2023. Under Article 20 of the proposals, Member States would be permitted to implement national provisions that allow national police authorities to query one of the interoperability components with biometric taken during an identity check. Such queries shall prevent irregular migration and ensure a high level of security within Union. In particular, this article seeks to examine the data protection concerns arising with regard to streamlined law enforcement access to non-law enforcement databases included in the interoperable framework, and addresses risks for individuals to become subject to unfair processing under Article 20 of the interoperability proposal. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 190 (10 UL)![]() Quintel, Teresa Alegra ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4/2018(4), 505-514 Detailed reference viewed: 111 (5 UL)![]() Robinson, Gavin ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4(3), 347-352 In April 2018, the European Commission presented a legislative package intended to enable, foster and formalise cross-border access by national judicial authorities to electronic evidence controlled by ... [more ▼] In April 2018, the European Commission presented a legislative package intended to enable, foster and formalise cross-border access by national judicial authorities to electronic evidence controlled by private service providers.1 In particular the public-private character of the ‘cooperation’ envisaged in the proposed set-up raises several questions at the interface of criminal procedure and data protection law. This report provides a brief overview of the proposed EUlegislation and an introduction to themost salient attendant legal and policy-related issues. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 155 (16 UL)![]() Quintel, Teresa Alegra ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4(2), 217-226 Detailed reference viewed: 125 (1 UL)![]() Quintel, Teresa Alegra ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4(1), 104-109 Detailed reference viewed: 240 (13 UL)![]() Vandendriessche, Annelies ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4(4), 483-491 Detailed reference viewed: 206 (7 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2017), 3(1), 90-92 Detailed reference viewed: 82 (1 UL) |
||