Browse ORBilu by Open Access
- What it is and what it isn't
- Green Road / Gold Road?
- Ready to Publish. Now What?
- How can I support the OA movement?
- Where can I learn more?
ORBilu is a project developed by
Showing results 1 to 20 of 25
   Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/30 Supplementing Directive 2014/53/EU on Radio Equipment: Strengthening Cybersecurity, Privacy and Personal Data Protection of Wireless DevicesChiara, Pier Giorgio  in European Data Protection Law Review (2022), 8(1), 103-107 This contribution highlights how the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/30 - activating the essential requirements of Article 3(3)(d), (e) and (f) of Directive 2014/53/EU on radio equipment (RED) - will ... [more ▼] This contribution highlights how the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/30 - activating the essential requirements of Article 3(3)(d), (e) and (f) of Directive 2014/53/EU on radio equipment (RED) - will enhance and complement existing cybersecurity and privacy & data protection EU legal frameworks while strengthening the (cyber)security of wireless (IoT) devices. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 125 (3 UL)Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioner’s ReportsCole, Mark David in European Data Protection Law Review (2022), 8(1), 73-77 Detailed reference viewed: 15 (0 UL)Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioner’s ReportsCole, Mark David in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(4), 560-563 Detailed reference viewed: 19 (1 UL) Cybersecurity is Gaining Momentum – NIS 2.0 Is on its WaySchmitz, Sandra in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), (4), 580-585 Detailed reference viewed: 52 (3 UL)Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioner’s ReportsCole, Mark David in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(3), 413-415 Detailed reference viewed: 28 (0 UL)Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioner’s ReportsCole, Mark David in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(2021), 217-220 Detailed reference viewed: 22 (0 UL)The Balance Between Security, Privacy and Data Protection in IoT Data Sharing: a Critique to Traditional "Security&Privacy" SurveysChiara, Pier Giorgio in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(1), 18-30 The paper examines the normative challenges of the Internet of Things (IoT), in particular, taking into account today’s debate on privacy, data protection, and security issues brought about by IoT. Three ... [more ▼] The paper examines the normative challenges of the Internet of Things (IoT), in particular, taking into account today’s debate on privacy, data protection, and security issues brought about by IoT. Three different layers of complexity are under scrutiny. They regard (i) moral and political theories on the concept of ‘security’; (ii) whether and to what extent information security technologies, in the context of IoT, may affect fundamental rights, such as privacy and data protection; and, (iii) new legal challenges for individual and group privacy and data protection. The overall aim of the paper is, on the one hand, to stress basic differences between privacy and data protection and why the distinction matters vis-à-vis the flow of information and data sharing on IoT. On the other hand, the intent is to stress the different meanings security has in this context, since the word is often used interchangeably to address information security, cybersecurity, or safety issues. We should take these distinctions firm, when striking balances between privacy, data protection, and ‘security’ on IoT. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 215 (2 UL)Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioner’s ReportsCole, Mark David in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(1), 91-93 Detailed reference viewed: 13 (0 UL)Synergies in Cybersecurity Incident Reporting – The NIS Cooperation Group Publication 04/20 in ContextSchmitz, Sandra ; Anheier, Fabian in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), 7(1), 101-107 Detailed reference viewed: 57 (5 UL)Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioner’s ReportsCole, Mark David in European Data Protection Law Review (2020), 6(1), 94-97 Detailed reference viewed: 31 (2 UL)Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioner’s ReportsCole, Mark David in European Data Protection Law Review (2020), 6(4), 549-553 Detailed reference viewed: 50 (0 UL)Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioner’s ReportsCole, Mark David in European Data Protection Law Review (2020), 6(3), 422-423 Detailed reference viewed: 27 (0 UL)Recent Developments and Overview of the Country ReportsCole, Mark David in European Data Protection Law Review (2020), 6(2), 259-261 Detailed reference viewed: 32 (0 UL)Interoperability of EU Databases and Access to Personal Data by National Police Authorities under Article 20 of the Commission ProposalsQuintel, Teresa Alegra in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4/2018(4), 470-482 This contribution assesses data protection concerns relating to the processing of personal data carried out pursuant to Article 20 of the interoperability proposals, which were published by the European ... [more ▼] This contribution assesses data protection concerns relating to the processing of personal data carried out pursuant to Article 20 of the interoperability proposals, which were published by the European Commission on 12 December 2017. The proposals seek to enable all centralised EU databases for security, border and migration management to be interconnected by 2023. Under Article 20 of the proposals, Member States would be permitted to implement national provisions that allow national police authorities to query one of the interoperability components with biometric taken during an identity check. Such queries shall prevent irregular migration and ensure a high level of security within Union. In particular, this article seeks to examine the data protection concerns arising with regard to streamlined law enforcement access to non-law enforcement databases included in the interoperable framework, and addresses risks for individuals to become subject to unfair processing under Article 20 of the interoperability proposal. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 190 (10 UL)European Union ∙ The Commission Proposal and EDPS Opinion 7/2018 on the Proposed Regulation Concerning Identity Cards of Union Citizens and Other DocumentsQuintel, Teresa Alegra in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4/2018(4), 505-514 Detailed reference viewed: 111 (5 UL)Report: The European Commission's e-Evidence ProposalRobinson, Gavin in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4(3), 347-352 In April 2018, the European Commission presented a legislative package intended to enable, foster and formalise cross-border access by national judicial authorities to electronic evidence controlled by ... [more ▼] In April 2018, the European Commission presented a legislative package intended to enable, foster and formalise cross-border access by national judicial authorities to electronic evidence controlled by private service providers.1 In particular the public-private character of the ‘cooperation’ envisaged in the proposed set-up raises several questions at the interface of criminal procedure and data protection law. This report provides a brief overview of the proposed EUlegislation and an introduction to themost salient attendant legal and policy-related issues. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 155 (16 UL)European Union ∙ EDPS and Article 29 Working Party Opinions about the Commission Proposals on the Interoperability of DatabasesQuintel, Teresa Alegra in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4(2), 217-226 Detailed reference viewed: 125 (1 UL)European Union ∙ Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion on the Law Enforcement DirectiveQuintel, Teresa Alegra in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4(1), 104-109 Detailed reference viewed: 240 (13 UL)Legal Developments in the Protection of Whistleblowers in the European UnionVandendriessche, Annelies in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4(4), 483-491 Detailed reference viewed: 206 (7 UL)The article 29 Working Party's Guidelines for Identifying the Lead Supervisory Authority in Cross-Border Data ProcessingSchmitz, Sandra in European Data Protection Law Review (2017), 3(1), 90-92 Detailed reference viewed: 82 (1 UL)
1
2
|
||
