![]() Bloch, Natalie ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2021), 12(1), 97-105 Detailed reference viewed: 105 (2 UL)![]() Heimböckel, Dieter ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2021), 12(1), 9-21 Detailed reference viewed: 67 (0 UL)![]() Heimböckel, Dieter ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2021), 12(1), 23-40 Detailed reference viewed: 75 (0 UL)![]() Amann, Wilhelm ![]() ![]() ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2020), 11(1), Detailed reference viewed: 80 (2 UL)![]() Pause, Johannes ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2020), 11(2), 171-186 Military exploits in the Cold War often differed from conventional acts of war particularly in that they were, by necessity, invisible: In order to prevent nuclear conflict, crises needed to be kept ... [more ▼] Military exploits in the Cold War often differed from conventional acts of war particularly in that they were, by necessity, invisible: In order to prevent nuclear conflict, crises needed to be kept secret, and were therefore not inscribed into cultural memory. Nuclear submarines are paradigmatic of this dynamic: As mobile nuclear missile silos, they played a central role in the balance of terror during the Cold War, effective because they remained passive and invisible. Cold War era submarine films, however, followed old genre traditions by conceiv-ing the submarine as a tactical, mostly explorative and active weapon. It was not until the 1990s that a reboot of the genre emerged, which sought to make the depths of the ocean vis-ible and memorable as a strategic location of the Cold War. Rather than portraying pure military actions, these movies tell stories of intercultural negotiation which, to prevent the outbreak of nuclear war, had to remain hidden under the surface of the sea. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 79 (4 UL)![]() Amann, Wilhelm ![]() ![]() ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2020), 11(2), Detailed reference viewed: 62 (1 UL)![]() Dembeck, Till ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2020), 11(1), 163176 Detailed reference viewed: 141 (6 UL)![]() Sieburg, Heinz ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2019), 10(2019 H. 2), 39-52 Detailed reference viewed: 88 (2 UL)![]() Heimböckel, Dieter ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2019), 10(2), 23-38 Detailed reference viewed: 48 (1 UL)![]() Amann, Wilhelm ![]() ![]() ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2019), 10(2), Detailed reference viewed: 68 (1 UL)![]() Amann, Wilhelm ![]() ![]() ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2019), 10(1), Detailed reference viewed: 93 (5 UL)![]() Heimböckel, Dieter ![]() ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2019), 10(2), 149-150 Detailed reference viewed: 43 (2 UL)![]() Heimböckel, Dieter ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2019), 10(1), 137-139 Detailed reference viewed: 110 (3 UL)![]() Bendheim, Amelie ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2018), 9(1), 197-199 Detailed reference viewed: 95 (1 UL)![]() Dembeck, Till ![]() ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2018), 9(2), 187-188 Detailed reference viewed: 148 (8 UL)![]() Heimböckel, Dieter ![]() ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2018), 9(1), 169-171 Detailed reference viewed: 127 (1 UL)![]() Wiegmann, Eva ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2017), 8(1), 185-189 Detailed reference viewed: 200 (0 UL)![]() Wiegmann, Eva ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2017), 8(2), 23-36 For the time being, research mostly ignores complex cross-cultural phenomena if they are not connected to the globalisation discourse. This contribution is meant to work against this one-sidedness and is ... [more ▼] For the time being, research mostly ignores complex cross-cultural phenomena if they are not connected to the globalisation discourse. This contribution is meant to work against this one-sidedness and is dedicated to cross-cultural reference patters which are most of all of a literary-aesthetic and hermeneutics-theoretical nature. The focus is on the reception of antiquity which, since the aesthetic revolution of about 1800, can no longer be clearly considered the continuation of a line of tradition but, by way of a distancing attitude, becomes particularly interesting for a cross-cultural view. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 125 (1 UL)![]() Heimböckel, Dieter ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2017), 8(2), 73-85 Detailed reference viewed: 142 (1 UL)![]() Amann, Wilhelm ![]() in Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Germanistik (2016), 2(2016), 80-89 Detailed reference viewed: 231 (9 UL) |
||