References of "Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailSeeking Compatibility in Preventing Crime with Artificial Intelligence and Ensuring a Fair Trial
Blount, Kelly UL

in Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology (2021), 15(1), 25-51

The justice system is increasingly reliant on new technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI). In the field of criminal law this also extends to the methods utilized by police for preventing crime ... [more ▼]

The justice system is increasingly reliant on new technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI). In the field of criminal law this also extends to the methods utilized by police for preventing crime. Though policing is not explicitly covered by Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights, this article will demonstrate that there can be adverse effects of policing on fair trial rights and make the analogy to criminal investigations as a recognized pre-trial process. Specifically, it will argue that policing that relies on AI to predict crime has direct effects on fair trial processes such as the equality of arms, the presumption of innocence, and the right to confront the evidence produced against a defendant. It will conclude by challenging the notion that AI is always an appropriate tool for legal processes. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 32 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailChallenges of Regulating a Right to Be Forgotten with Particular Reference to Facebook
Giurgiu, Andra UL

in Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology (2013), 7(2), 361-378

Detailed reference viewed: 108 (3 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailGoogle Privacy Policy - "in Breach of EU Law"?
Gniewek, Alicja UL

in Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology (2013), 7(2),

Detailed reference viewed: 51 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailFrom where are they Casting Stones? – Determining Jurisdiction in Online Defamation Claims
Schmitz, Sandra UL

in Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology (2012)

The question of international jurisdiction in defamation cases is long running. On the EU level, Regulation 44/2001 provides that in matters relating to defamation, the court where the defendant is ... [more ▼]

The question of international jurisdiction in defamation cases is long running. On the EU level, Regulation 44/2001 provides that in matters relating to defamation, the court where the defendant is domiciled, as well as the court for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur, are competent to hear the case. However, national courts struggled to apply traditional concepts that exist in the offline world to online matters. In its recent judgment in C-509/09 (eDate Advertising GmbH) and C-161/10 (Martinez) on the interpretation of place of the harmful event, the ECJ held that a multiplicity of possible fora exists for online defamation. Besides the connecting factors developed in C-68/93 (Shevill), the Court adapted a supplementary connecting factor: the centre of interests. Based on the opinion of the AG in joined cases C-509/07 and C-161/10 and an analysis of national case law, this paper calls for a test of objective relevance rather than a mere subjective interpretation of forum conveniens. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 133 (4 UL)