Collaborative problem solving education for the 21st century workforce

in Nature Human Behaviour (2018), 2

Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Einrichtung von Unionsagenturen von Andreas Orator

in Die Verwaltung (2018), 51

A Conceptual Understanding of EU Sectoral Administrative Law

in Hofmann, Herwig (Ed.) Specialised Administrative law of the European Union (2018)

Any attempt to survey the sectoral administrative law of the European Union begs a number of fundamental questions. First, how do we understand ‘administrative law’, especially in relation to a ... [more ▼]

Any attempt to survey the sectoral administrative law of the European Union begs a number of fundamental questions. First, how do we understand ‘administrative law’, especially in relation to a supranational structure and system, such as that of the Union? Secondly, what exactly might we understand by ‘sectoral’ or ‘specialized’ administrative law, again especially in the context of the EU? Thirdly, just what is the difference between European Union law as such, and its administrative law. These distinctions, and the definitions attempted, are not addressed here just as scholarly abstractions. We take the view that understanding them and differentiating between these terms will make clear from the outset what this book attempts to cover, especially with respect to the concepts of both general EU administrative law and specialized EU administrative law employed here (which may or may not be similar to conceptualizations found in national contexts where these terms are employed). [less ▲]

Specialized Administrative Law of the European Union

Book published by Oxford University Pressq - 1st (2018)

Les infractions en matière de gestion de portefeuille

in LAMY Droit pénal des affaires (2018)

OPCVM

in LAMY Droit du financement (2018)

Introduction to Investment Funs Law

in Haslehner, Werner (Ed.) Investment Fund Taxation (2018)

Deutsch im mehrsprachigen Bildungssystem Luxemburgs. Interkulturalität, Ökonomie und Medien im neuen "Global Village"

Presentation (2018)

Representation Equivalences among Argumentation Frameworks

in Computational Models of Argument (2018)

In Dung’s abstract argumentation theory, an extension can be represented by subsets of it in the sense that from each of these subsets, the extension can be obtained again by iteratively applying the ... [more ▼]

In Dung’s abstract argumentation theory, an extension can be represented by subsets of it in the sense that from each of these subsets, the extension can be obtained again by iteratively applying the characteristic function. Such so-called regular representations can be used to differentiate argumentation frameworks having the same extensions. In this paper we provide a full characterization of relations between seven different types of representation equivalence. [less ▲]

Preference in Abstract Argumentation

in Computational Models of Argument (2018)

Consider an argument A that is attacked by an argument B, while A is preferred to B. Existing approaches will either ignore the attack or reverse it. In this paper we introduce a new reduction of ... [more ▼]

Consider an argument A that is attacked by an argument B, while A is preferred to B. Existing approaches will either ignore the attack or reverse it. In this paper we introduce a new reduction of preference and attack to defeat, based on the idea that in such a case, instead of ignoring the attack, the preference is ignored. We compare this new reduction with the two existing ones using a principle-based approach, for the four Dung semantics. The principle-based or axiomatic approach is a methodology to choose an argumentation semantics for a particular application, and to guide the search for new argumentation semantics. For this analysis, we also introduce a fourth reduction, and a semantics for preference-based argumentation based on extension selection. Our classification of twenty alternatives for preference-based abstract argumentation semantics using six principles suggests that our new reduction has some advantages over the existing ones, in the sense that if the set of preferences increases, the sets of accepted arguments increase as well. [less ▲]