![]() Pieretti, Patrice ![]() ![]() ![]() Book published by Editions De Boeck & Larcier (2007) Cet ouvrage développe trois thèmes : 1) identification des spécialisations et avantages potentiels de la Place luxembourgeoise. Ce 1er chapitre présente selon trois approches (investisseurs individuels ... [more ▼] Cet ouvrage développe trois thèmes : 1) identification des spécialisations et avantages potentiels de la Place luxembourgeoise. Ce 1er chapitre présente selon trois approches (investisseurs individuels, clientèle "firme" et institutions financières) les grands avantages à la source des spécialisations de la Place financière luxembourgeoise; 2) attractivité des places bancaires et financières : les enjeux du cadre institutionnel et juridique. Ce 2e chapitre est consacré à une analyse théorique de la concurrence entre les places bancaires et financières pour l'attrait des capitaux; 3) La dynamique d'agglomération du pôle financier luxembourgeois. Ce 3e chapitre traite des forces centripètes et des forces centrifuges qui s'exercent au sein d'une place financière. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 296 (18 UL)![]() ![]() Venken, Machteld ![]() in Journal of Intercultural Studies (2007), 7 Detailed reference viewed: 24 (1 UL)![]() ; Brunner, Martin ![]() in Nationaler Bericht Luxemburg (2007) Detailed reference viewed: 58 (1 UL)![]() Dembeck, Till ![]() in Buschmeier, Matthias; Dembeck, Till (Eds.) Textbewegungen 1800/1900 (2007) Detailed reference viewed: 97 (1 UL)![]() Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() ![]() in Formal Models of Belief Change in Rational Agents (2007) In this paper, we consider a number of different ways of reasoning about voting as a problem of conciliating contradictory interests. The mechanisms that do the reconciliation are belief revision and be ... [more ▼] In this paper, we consider a number of different ways of reasoning about voting as a problem of conciliating contradictory interests. The mechanisms that do the reconciliation are belief revision and be- lief merging. By investigating the relationship between different voting strategies and their associated counterparts in revision theory, we find that whereas the counting mechanism of the voting process is more easily done at the meta-level in belief merging, it can be brought to the object level in base revision. In the former case, the counting can b e tweaked according to the aggregation procedure used, whereas in base revision, we can only rely on the notion of minimal change and hence the syntactical representation of the voters’ preferences plays a crucial part in the process. This highlights the similarities between the revi sion approaches on the one hand and voting on the other, but also opens up a numb er of interesting questions. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 33 (0 UL)![]() ; ; Thalmaier, Anton ![]() in Stochastic Processes & Their Applications (2007), 117(2), 202-220 Detailed reference viewed: 273 (19 UL)![]() ; ; Schlichenmaier, Martin ![]() Book published by American Institute of Physics (2007) Detailed reference viewed: 33 (0 UL) |
||