![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() Presentation (2014, April) Detailed reference viewed: 100 (0 UL)![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() Presentation (2014, April) Detailed reference viewed: 78 (0 UL)![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() Presentation (2014, April) Detailed reference viewed: 77 (2 UL)![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() in Poirier, Philippe (Ed.) Actes du Colloque « Démocratie(s), Liberté(s) et Religion(s) (2014) This paper deals with the relation between Religion, Liberal Democracy and Public Space. In a first step, I quickly expound the Rawlsian concept of public use of reason. In the second the critiques of the ... [more ▼] This paper deals with the relation between Religion, Liberal Democracy and Public Space. In a first step, I quickly expound the Rawlsian concept of public use of reason. In the second the critiques of the Rawlsian concept not only by communitarians but also by those – even Liberals - who believe that religion or faith is an essential dimension of individual identity, of the citizen, of a free and democratic country. Finally I discussed four different positions held by jürgen Habermas, Jeffrey Stout, Paul Weithman and Charles Taylor. Against Habermas, I argued that the modernistic position defended which goes back to Weber is too strong and can only lead to consider belivers as second-class citizens or « culturally backward people ». I underline the value of Stout’s and Wethman’s hermeneutic arguments explaining why Rawls felt the need to develop the idea of public reason as a solution in the context of a pluralistic and conflictual society before presenting Charles Taylor’s position on secularism as the best solution to the question of democratic pluralism. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 119 (4 UL)![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() in Theis, Robert (Ed.) Kant: Théologie et Religion (2013, September) Detailed reference viewed: 73 (8 UL)![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() in La démocratie, enrayée ? (2013, June 01) Detailed reference viewed: 87 (1 UL)![]() ![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() Scientific Conference (2013, March 22) Detailed reference viewed: 66 (0 UL)![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() Presentation (2013, March) Detailed reference viewed: 86 (0 UL)![]() ![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() in Heidemann, Dietmar; Weicker, Raoul (Eds.) Foi et Savoir / Glaube und Wissen (2013) Detailed reference viewed: 72 (2 UL)![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() Scientific Conference (2012, March 08) Detailed reference viewed: 77 (0 UL)![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() Scientific Conference (2011, October) Detailed reference viewed: 129 (1 UL)![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() ![]() Book published by Ed. Romaines (2011) Detailed reference viewed: 78 (1 UL)![]() ![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() in Eissa, Tina-Louise; Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz (Eds.) Geschichte der Bioethik. Eine Einführung (2011) Detailed reference viewed: 64 (0 UL)![]() ; Sosoe, Lukas ![]() Book published by Les Belles lettres (2007) Detailed reference viewed: 121 (0 UL)![]() ![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() in Mouillie (Ed.) Médecine et sciences humaines : manuel pour les études médicales. (2007) Detailed reference viewed: 104 (0 UL)![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() Scientific Conference (2006, September 30) Detailed reference viewed: 81 (0 UL)![]() ![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() in Thiaw-Po-Une, Ludivine (Ed.) Questions d’éthique contemporaine (2006) Detailed reference viewed: 69 (0 UL)![]() ![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() in Thiaw-Po-Une, Ludivine (Ed.) Questions d’éthique contemporaine (2006) Detailed reference viewed: 65 (0 UL)![]() Sosoe, Lukas ![]() ![]() Book published by Vrin (2005) La source peut être entendue comme ce qui exerce une influence. L’influence, dira la Critique de la faculté de juger, est de l’ordre de la succession (Nachfolge), non de l’imitation (Nachahmung). Elle est ... [more ▼] La source peut être entendue comme ce qui exerce une influence. L’influence, dira la Critique de la faculté de juger, est de l’ordre de la succession (Nachfolge), non de l’imitation (Nachahmung). Elle est ce à quoi on puise,ce qui oriente une pensée, mais aussi ce par rapport à quoi on définit sa propre position. Les études rassemblées dans le présent volume ont pour objet les sources de la pensée kantienne aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Les contributions essayent de les thématiser à partir de l’œuvre même de Kant, c’est-à-dire à partir de ce qui, dans les écrits kantiens, est repérable en tant que source. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 88 (2 UL) |
||