![]() Ma, Qin ![]() in Software and Systems Modeling (2022) Detailed reference viewed: 8 (0 UL)![]() ; ; Ma, Qin ![]() in Data and Knowledge Engineering (2022), 141 Detailed reference viewed: 8 (1 UL)![]() ; Ma, Qin ![]() in Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (2022) Detailed reference viewed: 9 (0 UL)![]() ; ; Ma, Qin ![]() Report (2021) Detailed reference viewed: 65 (4 UL)![]() ; ; Ma, Qin ![]() in Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (2021), 16 Detailed reference viewed: 76 (3 UL)![]() ; Ma, Qin ![]() in Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 400 (2020) While ADOxx is a popular platform for the creation and use of enterprise modeling languages, it provides only limited support for a well-formedness check of created enterprise models. In this paper, we ... [more ▼] While ADOxx is a popular platform for the creation and use of enterprise modeling languages, it provides only limited support for a well-formedness check of created enterprise models. In this paper, we propose to complement the meta modeling platform ADOxx with Alloy, which natively provides extensive model checking capabilities, so as to enable a well-formedness check of enterprise models created in ADOxx. Using the e3value modeling language as a point of departure, we particularly provide (a) a partial ADOxx implementation of e3value, (b) a proof-of-concept XML2Alloy parser, which allows for converting e3value models created in ADOxx into Alloy format, so that (c) e3value well-formedness constraints stated in Alloy can be used to check the valid- ity of an e3value model with the Alloy Evaluator. Beyond the specific proof-of-concept, we also discuss further possibilities of using ADOxx in conjunction with Alloy, particularly in checking the soundness of meta models underlying an enterprise modeling language. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 46 (0 UL)![]() ; ; et al in WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 2019 PROCEEDINGS (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 41 (2 UL)![]() ; ; Ma, Qin ![]() in IEEE 12th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 87 (1 UL)![]() ; Ma, Qin ![]() in 2018 International Conference on Information Management & Management Science (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 196 (5 UL)![]() ; ; Ma, Qin ![]() in Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 305 (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 100 (3 UL)![]() ; Ma, Qin ![]() in 19th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, CBI 2017, Thessaloniki, Greece, July 24-27, 2017, Volume 2: Workshop Papers (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 107 (5 UL)![]() Ma, Qin ![]() in In Proceedings of the 22nd International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (LNCS 9619) (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 80 (2 UL)![]() ; ; Constantinidis, Christina ![]() in Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems (2013) Enterprise Architecture (EA) is positioned as an instrument for coordinating enterprise transformation. However, existing EA approaches pay less attention to soft factors that may have an impact on ... [more ▼] Enterprise Architecture (EA) is positioned as an instrument for coordinating enterprise transformation. However, existing EA approaches pay less attention to soft factors that may have an impact on enterprise transformations. The existence of different organisational subcultures is not taken into account although it is considered as significant in the context of change. The social alignment of business and IT groups plays, for instance, a major role in transformations and in EA. This paper presents the first step of a larger study addressing the question how differences between organisational subcultures contribute to struggles/failure of EA-guided transformations. We use a series of qualitative, unstructured expert interviews to explore to what extent and how cultural differences can trigger struggles in EA-guided transformations from an architect’s perspective. Based on these interviews, an initial conceptual model is developed. This model suggests that communication breakdowns act as an intermediary factor between differences in organisational subculture and transformation struggles. A second round of expert interviews is used for the assessment and elaboration of the initial model focusing on communication breakdowns. The analysis of these interviews supports the intermediary role of communication breakdowns and refines the concepts of the model. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 397 (1 UL) |
||