Regulating Libra

in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (in press)

Europäisches Kapitalmarktrecht: Unternehmenskapitalmarktrecht (§ 15)

in Enzyklopädie des Europarechts, Europäisches Privat- und Unternehmensrecht, Band 6 (in press)

The AIFM Directive– European Regulation of Alternative Investment Funds

Book published by Kluwer Law International - 3rd ed. (in press)

§§ 6 bis 15 WpHG betreffend die Eingriffsbefugnisse der BaFin und Positionskontrollen

in Schwark; Zimmer (Eds.) Kapitalmarktrechtskommentar (in press)

Europäisches Kapitalmarktrecht: Grundlagen (§ 12)

in Enzyklopädie des Europarechts, Europäisches Privat- und Unternehmensrecht, Band 6 (in press)

§§ 675u - 676c zur Haftung des Zahlungsdienstleisters, Münch. Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch

in Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas (Ed.) §§ 675u - 676c zur Haftung des Zahlungsdienstleisters, Münch. Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch (in press)

The Dark Side of Digital Financial Transformation: The New Risks of FinTech and the Rise of TechRisk

in Singapore Journal of Legal Studies (in press)

Building FinTech Ecosystems: Regulatory Sandboxes, Innovation Hubs and Beyond

in Washington University Journal of Law and Policy (in press), 61

Around the world, regulators and policymakers are working to support the development of financial technology (FinTech) ecosystems. As one example, over 50 jurisdictions have now established or announced ... [more ▼]

Around the world, regulators and policymakers are working to support the development of financial technology (FinTech) ecosystems. As one example, over 50 jurisdictions have now established or announced “financial regulatory sandboxes”. Others have announced or established “innovation hubs”, sometimes incorporating a regulatory sandbox as one element. This article argues that innovation hubs provide all the benefits that the policy discussion associates with regulatory sandboxes, while avoiding most downsides of regulatory sandboxes, and that many benefits typically attributed to sandboxes are the result of inconsistent terminology, and actually accrue from the work of innovation hubs. The paper presents, as the first contribution of its kind, data on regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs and argues that the data so far available on sandboxes does not justify the statement that regulatory sandboxes are the most effective approach to building FinTech ecosystems. Given that regulatory sandboxes require significant financial contributions, sometimes new legislation, and intense regulatory risk management, and that sandboxes do not work as well on a stand-alone basis (i.e. without an innovation hub), while innovation hubs alone can provide more significant benefits in supporting the development of a FinTech ecosystem, regulators should focus their resources on developing effective innovation hubs, including in appropriate cases a sandbox as one possible element. [less ▲]

§§ 325 bis 329 HGB zur Publizität der Rechnungslegung von Handelsgesellschaften

in Rechnungslegungsrecht (in press)

Bürgschaft (§§ 765-778), in Erman, BGB

in Erman (Ed.) Bürgschaft (§§ 765-778), in Erman, BGB (in press)