![]() Sood, Mohit ![]() ![]() ![]() in Progress in Photovoltaics (2020) Post-device heat treatment (HT) in chalcopyrite [Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2] solar cells is known to improve the performance of the devices. However, this HT is only beneficial for devices made with absorbers grown ... [more ▼] Post-device heat treatment (HT) in chalcopyrite [Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2] solar cells is known to improve the performance of the devices. However, this HT is only beneficial for devices made with absorbers grown under Cu-poor conditions but not under Cu excess.. We present a systematic study to understand the effects of HT on CuInSe2 and CuInS2 solar cells. The study is performed for CuInSe2 solar cells grown under Cu-rich and Cu-poor chemical potential prepared with both CdS and Zn(O,S) buffer layers. In addition, we also study Cu-rich CuInS2 solar cells prepared with the suitable Zn(O,S) buffer layer. For Cu-poor selenide device low-temperature HT leads to passivation of bulk, whereas in Cu-rich devices no such passivation was observed. The Cu-rich devices are hampered by a large shunt. The HT decreases shunt resistance in Cu-rich selenides, whereas it increases shunt resistance in Cu-rich sulfides.. The origin of these changes in device performance was investigated with capacitance-voltage measurement which shows the considerable decrease in carrier concentration with HT in Cu-poor CuInSe2, and temperature dependent current-voltage measurements show the presence of barrier for minority carriers. Together with numerical simulations, these findings support a highly-doped interfacial p+ layer device model in Cu-rich selenide absorbers and explain the discrepancy between Cu-poor and Curich device performance. Our findings provide insights into how the same treatment can have a completely different effect on the device depending on the composition of the absorber. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 175 (11 UL)![]() Werner, Florian ![]() ![]() in Scientific Reports (2020) Detailed reference viewed: 180 (5 UL)![]() Siebentritt, Susanne ![]() in Advanced Energy Materials (2020) Detailed reference viewed: 133 (7 UL)![]() ; ; Werner, Florian ![]() in ACS Applied Polymer Materials (2020) Detailed reference viewed: 104 (6 UL)![]() Werner, Florian ![]() ![]() in Physical Review Applied (2020) Detailed reference viewed: 216 (2 UL)![]() Spindler, Conrad ![]() ![]() ![]() in Physical Review Materials (2019), 3 Detailed reference viewed: 241 (21 UL)![]() Elanzeery, Hossam ![]() ![]() ![]() in Physical Review Materials (2019), 3 Detailed reference viewed: 201 (16 UL)![]() Werner, Florian ![]() ![]() ![]() in Progress in Photovoltaics (2019), 27 Detailed reference viewed: 196 (1 UL)![]() Elanzeery, Hossam ![]() ![]() ![]() in Progress in Photovoltaics (2018) Thin film tandem solar cells provide a promising approach to achieve high efficiencies. These tandem cells require at least a bottom low bandgap and an upper high bandgap solar cell. In this contribution ... [more ▼] Thin film tandem solar cells provide a promising approach to achieve high efficiencies. These tandem cells require at least a bottom low bandgap and an upper high bandgap solar cell. In this contribution, 2 high‐performance Cu(In,Ga)Se2 cells with bandgaps as low as 1.04 and 1.07 eV are presented. These cells have shown certified efficiencies of 15.7% and 16.6% respectively. Measuring these cells under a 780‐nm longpass filter, corresponding to the bandgap of a typical top cell in tandem applications (1.57 eV), they achieved efficiencies of 7.9% and 8.3%. Admittance measurements showed no recombination active deep defects. One additional high‐performance CuInSe2 thin film solar cell with bandgap of 0.95 eV and efficiency of 14.1% is presented. All 3 cells have the potential to be integrated as bottom low bandgap cells in thin film tandem applications achieving efficiencies around 24% stacked with an efficient high bandgap top cell. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 266 (7 UL)![]() Werner, Florian ![]() ![]() in Physical Review Applied (2018), 9 Detailed reference viewed: 178 (2 UL)![]() Werner, Florian ![]() ![]() ![]() in Progress in Photovoltaics (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 214 (5 UL)![]() Colombara, Diego ![]() ![]() in Nature Communications (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 455 (16 UL)![]() Werner, Florian ![]() ![]() ![]() in ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces (2018), 10 Detailed reference viewed: 168 (9 UL)![]() Werner, Florian ![]() in Journal of Applied Physics (2017), 122 Detailed reference viewed: 192 (5 UL)![]() Hala, Matej ![]() in Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells (2017), 161 Detailed reference viewed: 349 (14 UL)![]() Werner, Florian ![]() ![]() in Thin Solid Films (2017), 633 Detailed reference viewed: 228 (9 UL)![]() Zelenina, Anastasiya ![]() ![]() ![]() in Applied Physics Letters (2017), 111 Detailed reference viewed: 204 (11 UL)![]() Hala, Matej ![]() in IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference. Conference Record (2016), 978-1-5090-2724 Detailed reference viewed: 208 (6 UL)![]() Sendler, Jan ![]() ![]() ![]() in Journal of Applied Physics (2016), 120 Detailed reference viewed: 253 (6 UL)![]() ; ; et al in Journal of Materials Chemistry C (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 247 (1 UL) |
||