![]() ; Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() in Csapo, Beno; Funke, Joachim (Eds.) The nature of problem solving (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 164 (19 UL)![]() ![]() Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2016, April) Detailed reference viewed: 146 (5 UL)![]() ; Wüstenberg, Sascha ![]() ![]() in European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2016), 32(1), 52-60 Detailed reference viewed: 131 (10 UL)![]() Kretzschmar, André ![]() ![]() ![]() in Intelligence (2016), 54 Although Complex Problem Solving (CPS) has attracted increasing amounts of attention in recent years (e.g., PISA study), the role of CPS in the nomological network of intelligence is controversial. The ... [more ▼] Although Complex Problem Solving (CPS) has attracted increasing amounts of attention in recent years (e.g., PISA study), the role of CPS in the nomological network of intelligence is controversial. The question of whether CPS is a distinct construct is as old as CPS research itself, but previous studies have had specific shortcomings when addressing the question of whether CPS is a separable or independent construct. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to combine the advantages of previous studies to facilitate a less biased view of the relation between CPS and established intelligence constructs. A sample of 227 German university students worked on a comprehensive measure of intelligence (Berlin Intelligence Structure test) and two CPS assessment tools (MicroDYN and MicroFIN). Furthermore, final school grades (GPA) served as an external criterion. We applied confirmatory factor analyses and structural equation modeling to investigate the relation between CPS and established intelligence constructs on the basis of different psychometric approaches (i.e., first-order model, nested factor model). Moreover, we examined the incremental validity of CPS in explaining GPA beyond established intelligence constructs. Results indicate that CPS represents unique variance that is not accounted for by established intelligence constructs. The incremental validity of CPS was found only when a commonly used narrow operationalization of intelligence was applied (i.e., figural reasoning) but not when a broad operationalization was applied. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 292 (20 UL)![]() ![]() Wüstenberg, Sascha ![]() ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2015, August 28) Detailed reference viewed: 119 (1 UL)![]() ![]() ; Wollschläger, Rachel ![]() Scientific Conference (2015, July) Detailed reference viewed: 117 (4 UL)![]() ![]() Wüstenberg, Sascha ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2015, April 16) Detailed reference viewed: 72 (1 UL)![]() Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() Presentation (2015, April) Detailed reference viewed: 144 (3 UL)![]() Kretzschmar, André ![]() ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2015, April) Detailed reference viewed: 94 (2 UL)![]() Wüstenberg, Sascha ![]() ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2015, March 28) Detailed reference viewed: 80 (2 UL)![]() ![]() Wüstenberg, Sascha ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2015, March 11) Detailed reference viewed: 69 (1 UL)![]() Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() ![]() Presentation (2015, March) Detailed reference viewed: 91 (5 UL)![]() Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() Computer development (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 365 (4 UL)![]() ; Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() in Learning and Individual Differences (2015), 39 Detailed reference viewed: 179 (17 UL)![]() Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() in Computers and Education (2015), 91 Detailed reference viewed: 443 (23 UL)![]() Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() ![]() in Thinking Skills and Creativity (2015), 8 Detailed reference viewed: 175 (25 UL)![]() Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() in Thinking & Reasoning (2015), 21 Detailed reference viewed: 202 (4 UL)![]() Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() ![]() in Thinking Skills and Creativity (2015), 8 Detailed reference viewed: 79 (20 UL)![]() Rudolph, Julia ![]() ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 101 (1 UL)![]() Greiff, Samuel ![]() ![]() ![]() Report (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 98 (3 UL) |
||