![]() Andersen, Katja Natalie ![]() in Forum für Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in Luxemburg (2022), 423 Cette contribution s’appuie sur les conclusions du projet European Comparison of Inclusive Teaching Materials (ITM) lancé en 2018. Cette collaboration regroupant l’Allemagne (Prof. Dr. M. Vogt, C ... [more ▼] Cette contribution s’appuie sur les conclusions du projet European Comparison of Inclusive Teaching Materials (ITM) lancé en 2018. Cette collaboration regroupant l’Allemagne (Prof. Dr. M. Vogt, C. Bierschwale), le Luxembourg (Prof. Dr. K. Andersen), la Suède (Prof. Dr. A. Bagger) et l’Italie (Prof. Dr. V. Macchia, Prof. Dr. A. Augschöll, A. Ardemagni) cherche un moyen de définir le caractère inclusif des supports pédagogiques. C’est dans cette perspective qu’a été développé un catalogue de critères permettant d’évaluer la pertinence des supports pédagogiques en vue de leur utilisation dans des contextes d’enseignement inclusif. La présente contribution présente ces critères en les mettant en parallèle avec les conclusions des recherches menées au Luxembourg. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 43 (2 UL)![]() ; Andersen, Katja Natalie ![]() in Grundschule aktuell (2021), 17(155), 18-21 Möchte man im Unterricht den diversen Bedarfslagen aller SchülerInnen gerecht werden, steht man als Lehrperson vor vielseitigen Herausforderungen. Dass hier personelle Ressourcen eine zentrale Rolle ... [more ▼] Möchte man im Unterricht den diversen Bedarfslagen aller SchülerInnen gerecht werden, steht man als Lehrperson vor vielseitigen Herausforderungen. Dass hier personelle Ressourcen eine zentrale Rolle spielen, wird zwar häufig betont, jedoch kaum schuladministrativ ausreichend berücksichtigt. Um die Lehrpersonen trotzdem handlungsfähig zu halten, müssen deshalb andere Optionen mitgedacht und im Sinne unterstützender Maßnahmen realisiert werden. Hierzu zählen u. a. eine umfängliche Professionalisierung in der LehrerInnenaus- und -weiterbildung wie ebenso Beratungsstrukturen für unterrichtliche Problemlagen. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 85 (6 UL)![]() ![]() ; Andersen, Katja Natalie ![]() in Treagust, David F.; Fischer, Hans E.; Girwidz, Raimund (Eds.) Physics Education: Challenges in Physics Education (2021) Specific features in the three steps of theoretical framing, data collection and data analysis characterise qualitative research on science education. As a general tendency, the qualitative paradigm ... [more ▼] Specific features in the three steps of theoretical framing, data collection and data analysis characterise qualitative research on science education. As a general tendency, the qualitative paradigm contributes to research results that are gained by the interpretation of non-numerical data collected through a rather open, not hypothesis-driven, process-like research (Bortz and Döring in Research methods and evaluation: for human and social scientists. Springer Medizin, Heidelberg, 2016; Lamnek and Krell in Qualitative social research: With online material. Beltz, Weinheim, 2016). Beyond this pragmatic shortcut to the paradigmatic perspective, it should be emphasised that the following contribution is based on a fundamental understanding of qualitative research in the sense of a multidimensional modular system. The individual components of this system can be used and combined flexibly. However, this must happen based on the solid foundation of theory and the principled orientation towards the object of research or research questions. This contribution presents and discusses current trends in qualitative research on science education in schools. The chapter focusses on the four steps (a) theoretical groundwork for a research project in didactics, (b) data collection implying sampling, methods and technical support, (c) data analysis with its diverse methods and criteria of quality and (d) the interpretation of the analysed data related to the theoretical framework as well as to the research field. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 84 (8 UL)![]() ; ; Andersen, Katja Natalie ![]() in Kölner Online Journal für Lehrer*innenbildung (2020), 2(2), 1-25 This article deals with the development of quality criteriaof inclusive teaching materials in mathematics. As part of an international comparative research design, group discussions were held with primary ... [more ▼] This article deals with the development of quality criteriaof inclusive teaching materials in mathematics. As part of an international comparative research design, group discussions were held with primary school math teachers. After analyzing the content of the group discussions there were sixcriteria that characterize inclusive teaching material in mathematics, including the structure of the material, individualization, collaborativelearning, conceptualization e.g. with regard to principles of mathematical education, mathematical task culture and metacognitive support. The findings presented in the form of the criteria catalogprovide new impulses for teacher trainings and the development of inclusive teaching material. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 39 (3 UL) |
||