Browse ORBilu by Open Access
- What it is and what it isn't
- Green Road / Gold Road?
- Ready to Publish. Now What?
- How can I support the OA movement?
- Where can I learn more?
ORBilu is a project developed by
   Automated Anonymization of Court Decisions: Facilitating the Publication of Court Decisions through Algorithmic SystemsTerzidou, Kalliopi  in ICAIL: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (Ed.) ICAIL '23: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (2023, September 07) The practice of anonymization of court decisions has been further systematized by EU Member States’ courts, after the entry into force of the General Data Protection Regulation and its transposition into ... [more ▼] The practice of anonymization of court decisions has been further systematized by EU Member States’ courts, after the entry into force of the General Data Protection Regulation and its transposition into national laws. Anonymization of the parties’ personal information protects their privacy during the publication of judgments, which is necessary for the scrutiny of the judiciary’s reasoning in a given case and the filing of an appeal whenever a party disagrees with the court’s reasoning and/or order. European courts have recently resorted to algorithmic approaches to automate the process of anonymization, which can bestow prompt and consistent application of anonymization rules for court administrations to comply with the applicable personal data protection legislation. These automated solutions can also encompass technical and administrative challenges, ranging from re-ιdentification risks that compromise the protection of the parties’ personal data to the lack of acceptance of the algorithmic system by court staff during their daily work routine. The present paper reviews current anonymization practices conducted through algorithmic techniques by, first, explaining the legal framework underlying the publication and anonymization of court decisions, second, examining three algorithmic solutions for the anonymization of court decisions by different EU Member States, and third, reflecting on their efficiencies and challenges for court administrations. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 31 (3 UL)The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary and Its Compliance with the Right to a Fair TrialTerzidou, Kalliopi in Journal of Judicial Administration (2022), 31(3), 154-168 European courts are increasingly investing in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for the automation of the administration of justice, to improve the efficiency and quality of the judiciary. However ... [more ▼] European courts are increasingly investing in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for the automation of the administration of justice, to improve the efficiency and quality of the judiciary. However, AI can display considerable issues, such as opaqueness and unfair bias, resulting from the defective designing of their algorithms. This article explores the opportunities and risks of AI technology for court users – including judicial staff, legal representatives and litigants – by investigating proposed and developed applications by European judiciaries under the right to a fair trial. AI is found to pose certain risks to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, as well as to the adversarial and public character of court proceedings, notwithstanding the opportunities for the improvement of access to courts. The regulatory solutions for the safe use of AI adopted by European judiciaries can encourage similar practices in other judiciaries, including Australia and the United States. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 257 (11 UL)Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Data protection in the judiciary in EU and EEA Member StatesTerzidou, Kalliopi ; ; et alin International Data Privacy Law (2022) Detailed reference viewed: 67 (19 UL)Autonomous Vehicles: Data Protection and Ethical ConsiderationsTerzidou, Kalliopi ; ; et alin Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery (2020, December) Detailed reference viewed: 65 (11 UL)Profiling in the digital age: implications of artificial intelligence and challenges on data protection ITerzidou, Kalliopi in Hellenic Review of European Law (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 22 (5 UL)Βιβλιοπαρουσίαση: Άσυλο, σύνορα και δικαιώματα στην Ευρώπη: Αναζητώντας δίκαιες ισορροπίεςTerzidou, Kalliopi in Hellenic Review of European Law (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 18 (2 UL)Μυστική παρακολούθηση και το δικαίωμα σεβασμού της ιδιωτικής ζωής - ΕΔΔΑ, Προσφυγές Nos 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15, Υπόθεση Big Brother Watch και λοιποί κατά Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου, απόγαση της 13ης Σεπτεμβρίου 2018Terzidou, Kalliopi in Hellenic Review of European Law (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 15 (0 UL) |
||
