![]() Terzidou, Kalliopi ![]() in Journal of Judicial Administration (2022), 31(3), 154-168 European courts are increasingly investing in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for the automation of the administration of justice, to improve the efficiency and quality of the judiciary. However ... [more ▼] European courts are increasingly investing in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for the automation of the administration of justice, to improve the efficiency and quality of the judiciary. However, AI can display considerable issues, such as opaqueness and unfair bias, resulting from the defective designing of their algorithms. This article explores the opportunities and risks of AI technology for court users – including judicial staff, legal representatives and litigants – by investigating proposed and developed applications by European judiciaries under the right to a fair trial. AI is found to pose certain risks to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, as well as to the adversarial and public character of court proceedings, notwithstanding the opportunities for the improvement of access to courts. The regulatory solutions for the safe use of AI adopted by European judiciaries can encourage similar practices in other judiciaries, including Australia and the United States. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 169 (10 UL)![]() Terzidou, Kalliopi ![]() in International Data Privacy Law (2022) Detailed reference viewed: 60 (16 UL)![]() Terzidou, Kalliopi ![]() in Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery (2020, December) Detailed reference viewed: 60 (11 UL)![]() Terzidou, Kalliopi ![]() in Hellenic Review of European Law (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 20 (5 UL)![]() Terzidou, Kalliopi ![]() in Hellenic Review of European Law (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 16 (2 UL)![]() Terzidou, Kalliopi ![]() in Hellenic Review of European Law (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 13 (0 UL) |
||