References of "Stierle, Martin 50045419"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
See detailAnmerkung zur EuGH-Entscheidung in C-44/21 (Phoenix Contact v Harting)
Stierle, Martin UL

in Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte (2022), 2022(6), 277-279

Detailed reference viewed: 40 (2 UL)
Full Text
See detailUnterlassung und Verhältnismäßigkeit - das 2. PatMoG als Neuanfang
Stierle, Martin UL

in GRUR (Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht) (2022), (5), 273-274

Detailed reference viewed: 42 (0 UL)
See detailDo we need artificial inventors?
Stierle, Martin UL

Article for general public (2021)

Detailed reference viewed: 33 (4 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailUnverhältnismäßigkeit, Injunction Gap und Geheimnisschutz im Prozess. Das Zweite Patentrechtsmodernisierungsgesetz im Überblick.
Ohly, Ansgar; Stierle, Martin UL

in Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (2021)

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailA De Lege Ferenda Perspective on Artificial Intelligence Systems Designated as Inventors in the European Patent System.
Stierle, Martin UL

in Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil (2021)

The European patent system was designed around a paradigm of human inventorship. This paper will analyse in depth and from a de lege ferenda perspective the rather general arguments against and in favour ... [more ▼]

The European patent system was designed around a paradigm of human inventorship. This paper will analyse in depth and from a de lege ferenda perspective the rather general arguments against and in favour of a possible designation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems as inventors. For the sake of a more concrete discussion, it will also outline a potential reform of the European patent system to implement AI inventorship and allocate the right to the European patent for such inventions by default to the machine’s operator. In the process, it will highlight the major specific issues associated with a reform that acknowledges AI inventorship and touch upon possible alternative approaches to addressing the growing autonomy of machines within the R&D process. The study must not be understood as a call for a reform to recognise AI systems as inventors but rather as a manner of laying the foundations for a more concrete, critical and fruitful discussion on non-human inventorship and its alternatives. The analysis will show that the more general, highly conceptional reservations advanced in the current discussion against AI inventorship are somewhat unfounded, e.g. the alleged break with the functions of the current patent system or the alleged need to endow AI with legal personality. More convincing arguments against a reform that allows for the designation of AI systems as inventor might instead relate to the specific difficulties associated with such reform. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (0 UL)
Full Text
See detailArtificial Intelligence Designated as Inventor – An Analysis of the Recent EPO Case Law.
Stierle, Martin UL

in Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailZum Unverhältnismäßigkeitsvorbehalt im patentrechtlichen Unterlassungsrecht.
Stierle, Martin UL

in Mitteilungen der Patentanwälte (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailNeues von der patentrechtlichen Zwangslizenz. Ein Überblick anlässlich BGH „Alirocumab“.
Stierle, Martin UL

in Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 14 (1 UL)
See detailCase note to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, decision of 9/11/2018 – Arista Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Stierle, Martin UL

in Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 10 (0 UL)
See detailConference report: Injunctions and Flexibility in Patent Law – Civil Law and Common Law Perspectives.
Antoine, Luice; Stierle, Martin UL

in Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 18 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPatent Injunctions – Identifying Common Elements.
Stierle, Martin UL

in Intellectual Property Journal (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 25 (5 UL)
Full Text
See detail„Patent trolls“ versus nicht-praktizierte Patente – Ein soll-funktionales Plädoyer für einen Perspektivenwechsel.
Stierle, Martin UL

in Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Newsletter (2018), 01

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (1 UL)
See detailDas nicht-praktizierte Patent
Stierle, Martin UL

Book published by Mohr Siebeck (2018)

"Non-practicing entities" have shaped discussions on patent law over the last decade. Martin Stierle offers a fresh perspective and draws the focus away from non-practicing patent holders. He develops a ... [more ▼]

"Non-practicing entities" have shaped discussions on patent law over the last decade. Martin Stierle offers a fresh perspective and draws the focus away from non-practicing patent holders. He develops a modern understanding of the patent function theory and drafts an obligation to practice that applies to all kinds of non-practiced patents. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 37 (4 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailAnmerkung zu BPatG, Urteil vom 31.8.2016 (3 LiQ 1/16 (EP)) – Isentress.
Stierle, Martin UL

in Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 10 (0 UL)