Browse ORBilu by Open Access
- What it is and what it isn't
- Green Road / Gold Road?
- Ready to Publish. Now What?
- How can I support the OA movement?
- Where can I learn more?
ORBilu is a project developed by
   Machine learning-based identification and characterization of 15 novel pathogenic SUOX missense mutations; ; et al in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism (2021) Isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency (ISOD) is a rare hereditary metabolic disease caused by absence of functional sulfite oxidase (SO) due to mutations of the SUOX gene. SO oxidizes toxic sulfite and ... [more ▼] Isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency (ISOD) is a rare hereditary metabolic disease caused by absence of functional sulfite oxidase (SO) due to mutations of the SUOX gene. SO oxidizes toxic sulfite and sulfite accumulation is associated with neurological disorders, progressive brain atrophy and early death. Similarities of these neurological symptoms to abundant diseases like neonatal encephalopathy underlines the raising need to increase the awareness for ISOD. Here we report an interdisciplinary approach utilizing exome/genome data derived from gnomAD database as well as published variants to predict the pathogenic outcome of 303 naturally occurring SO missense variants and combining these with activity determination. We identified 15 novel ISOD-causing SO variants and generated a databank of pathogenic SO missense variants to support future diagnosis of ISOD patients. We found six inactive variants (W101G, H118Y, E197K, R217W, S427W, D512Y, Q518R) and seven (D110H, P119S, G121E, G130R, Y140C, R269H, Q396P, R459Q) with severe reduction in activity. Based on the Hardy-Weinberg-equilibrium and the combination of our results with published SO missense and protein truncating variants, we calculated the first comprehensive incidence rate for ISOD of 1 in 1,377,341 births and provide a pathogenicity score to 303 naturally occurring SO missense variants. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 62 (4 UL) Evaluation of Presumably Disease Causing SCN1A Variants in a Cohort of Common Epilepsy Syndromes; ; et al in PLoS ONE (2016) Objective The SCN1A gene, coding for the voltage-gated Na+ channel alpha subunit NaV1.1, is the clinically most relevant epilepsy gene. With the advent of high-throughput next-generation sequencing ... [more ▼] Objective The SCN1A gene, coding for the voltage-gated Na+ channel alpha subunit NaV1.1, is the clinically most relevant epilepsy gene. With the advent of high-throughput next-generation sequencing, clinical laboratories are generating an ever-increasing catalogue of SCN1A variants. Variants are more likely to be classified as pathogenic if they have already been identified previously in a patient with epilepsy. Here, we critically re-evaluate the pathogenicity of this class of variants in a cohort of patients with common epilepsy syndromes and subsequently ask whether a significant fraction of benign variants have been misclassified as pathogenic. Methods We screened a discovery cohort of 448 patients with a broad range of common genetic epilepsies and 734 controls for previously reported SCN1A mutations that were assumed to be disease causing. We re-evaluated the evidence for pathogenicity of the identified variants using in silico predictions, segregation, original reports, available functional data and assessment of allele frequencies in healthy individuals as well as in a follow up cohort of 777 patients. Results and Interpretation We identified 8 known missense mutations, previously reported as pathogenic, in a total of 17 unrelated epilepsy patients (17/448; 3.80%). Our re-evaluation indicates that 7 out of these 8 variants (p.R27T; p.R28C; p.R542Q; p.R604H; p.T1250M; p.E1308D; p.R1928G; NP_001159435.1) are not pathogenic. Only the p.T1174S mutation may be considered as a genetic risk factor for epilepsy of small effect size based on the enrichment in patients (P = 6.60 x 10−4; OR = 0.32, fishers exact test), previous functional studies but incomplete penetrance. Thus, incorporation of previous studies in genetic counseling of SCN1A sequencing results is challenging and may produce incorrect conclusions. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 252 (8 UL) |
||
