![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() in Onwubiko, Cyril; Rosati, Pierangelo; Rege, Aunshul (Eds.) et al Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybersecurity, Situational Awareness and Social Media (2023, March 08) Detailed reference viewed: 53 (0 UL)![]() Cole, Mark David ![]() ![]() in Applied Cybersecurity & Internet Governance (2022), 1(1), Cybersecurity regulation in the EU has long been implemented in a piece- meal fashion resulting in a fragmented regulatory landscape. Recent developments triggered the EU to review its approach which has ... [more ▼] Cybersecurity regulation in the EU has long been implemented in a piece- meal fashion resulting in a fragmented regulatory landscape. Recent developments triggered the EU to review its approach which has not resulted in the envisaged high level of cyber resilience across the Union. The paper addresses the EU’s limited mandate to regulate cybersecurity and outlines how the internal market rationale serves as a basis to harmonise cybersecurity legislation in the EU Member States. In that regard, the recent Proposal for a NIS 2.0 Directive (adopted by the European Parliament in November 2022) and the Proposal for a Cyber Resilience Act (published in September 2022) highlight how the EU seeks to align legislation and reduce complexity between different, often sectoral regulatory approaches to cybersecurity, while at the same time extending regulation in a view to achieve a high level of cybersecurity across the EU. As regards the latter, the paper also outlines how the Cyber Resilience Act will complement the NIS 2.0 Directive in order to close existing regulatory gaps. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 118 (5 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2022), 8(4), 517-520 Detailed reference viewed: 42 (0 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() ![]() in International Cybersecurity Law Review (2022) With the COVID-19 pandemic accelerating digital transformation of the Single Market, the European Commission also speeded up the review of the first piece of European Union (EU)-wide cybersecurity ... [more ▼] With the COVID-19 pandemic accelerating digital transformation of the Single Market, the European Commission also speeded up the review of the first piece of European Union (EU)-wide cybersecurity legislation, the NIS Directive. Originally foreseen for May 2021, the Commission presented the review as early as December 2020 together with a Proposal for a NIS2 Directive. Almost in parallel, some Member States strengthened (or adopted) national laws beyond the scope of the NIS Directive to respond adequately to the fast-paced digital threat landscape. Against this backdrop, the article investigates the national interventions in the field of cybersecurity recently adopted by Italy and Germany. In order to identify similarities and divergences of the Italian and German national frameworks with the European Commission’s Proposal for a NIS2 Directive, the analysis will focus on selected aspects extrapolated from the Commission Proposal, namely: i) the enlarged scope; ii) detailed cybersecurity risk-management measures; iii) more stringent supervisory measures; and, iv) stricter enforcement requirements, including harmonised sanctions across the EU. The article concludes that the national cybersecurity legal frameworks under scrutiny already match the core of the proposed changes envisaged by the NIS2 Proposal. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 70 (6 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() Scientific Conference (2022, July 07) Detailed reference viewed: 40 (1 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() Scientific Conference (2022, May 25) Detailed reference viewed: 47 (1 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() Scientific Conference (2022, May 10) Detailed reference viewed: 196 (0 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() in European Journal of Law and Technology (2022), 13(1), Detailed reference viewed: 57 (2 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() Presentation (2022, April 13) Detailed reference viewed: 45 (1 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() Scientific Conference (2022, April 13) Detailed reference viewed: 33 (2 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() in Friedewald, Michael; Krenn, Stephan; Schiffner, Stefan (Eds.) et al Privacy and Identity Management. Between Data Protection and Security (2022, March 31) Detailed reference viewed: 52 (2 UL)![]() ; ; Schmitz, Sandra ![]() E-print/Working paper (2022) Detailed reference viewed: 16 (0 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() Presentation (2021, December 01) Detailed reference viewed: 90 (0 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2021), (4), 580-585 Detailed reference viewed: 64 (3 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() Presentation (2021, November 12) Detailed reference viewed: 47 (0 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() E-print/Working paper (2021) Detailed reference viewed: 49 (2 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() ![]() Presentation (2021, April 14) When George Evans stated that every student can learn, just not on the same day, he had probably not in mind the despair of pupils trying to access an e-learning platform during a national lockdown period ... [more ▼] When George Evans stated that every student can learn, just not on the same day, he had probably not in mind the despair of pupils trying to access an e-learning platform during a national lockdown period. With the COVID19 crisis, online learning became an everyday commodity almost overnight; however, not all schools were prepared to swiftly switch from in class to remote teaching. Concerns were raised with regard to data protection and cyber security, which in some cases led to the implementation of “home-made” solutions. Taking the example of the federalist state of Germany, where education is within the sole competence of the Länder, this paper will explore the functioning and technical implementation of a variety of e-learning platforms before data protection concerns are addressed. We will then explore whether the NIS Directive, which foresees similar security requirements as the GDPR, is applicable to the diverse models, and outline the consequences. In light of the acceleration of the revision of the NIS Directive due to the COVID-19 crisis, we take the example of learning platforms to outline the flaws of the 2016 Directive before we critically evaluate selected aspects of the NIS 2.0 proposal of December 2020. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 132 (6 UL)![]() ; ; et al Report (2021) Detailed reference viewed: 71 (6 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() ![]() in Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law (2021), 12(5), Detailed reference viewed: 33 (4 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() ![]() in International Review of Law, Computers and Technology (2021), 35(2), Detailed reference viewed: 140 (6 UL) |
||