![]() ![]() ; ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in Beyond Faith and Rationality (2020) This paper offers a Talmudic norms solution to the paradox of the heap. The claim is that the paradox arises because philosophers use the wrong language to discuss it. We need a language about objects ... [more ▼] This paper offers a Talmudic norms solution to the paradox of the heap. The claim is that the paradox arises because philosophers use the wrong language to discuss it. We need a language about objects which is capable of expressing not only the declarative properties of the object (such as being a heap) but also how the object/heap was constructed. Such a view of objects comes from the Talmudic theory of mixtures. To this we add a first attempt at modelling the Talmudic normative theory of mixing (Talmudic calculus of Sorites). We seek a correlation between Talmudic positions on mixtures and philosophical positions on Sorites. The Talmud is very practical and cannot allow for any theoretically unresolved paradox to get in the way, and so it has a lot to offer to philosophy in general and to the heap paradox in particular. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 64 (2 UL)![]() ; ; et al in Computational Models of Rationality, Essays dedicated to Gabriele Kern-Isberner on the occasion of her 60th birthday (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 48 (0 UL)![]() ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in HOWARD-60: A Festschrift on the Occasion of Howard Barringer's 60th Birthday (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 58 (0 UL)![]() ; ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in Journal of Applied Logic (2013), 11(1), 63--90 Detailed reference viewed: 128 (2 UL)![]() ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in Artificial Intelligence and Law (2012), 20(2), 145--179 Detailed reference viewed: 124 (1 UL)![]() ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in Artificial Intelligence and Law (2011), 19(2-3), 117148 Detailed reference viewed: 141 (1 UL)![]() ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in DEON (2010) This paper examines the deontic logic of the Talmud. We shall find, by looking at examples, that at first approximation we need deontic logic with several connectives: OTA Talmudic obligation FTA Talmudic ... [more ▼] This paper examines the deontic logic of the Talmud. We shall find, by looking at examples, that at first approximation we need deontic logic with several connectives: OTA Talmudic obligation FTA Talmudic prohibition FDA Standard deontic prohibition ODA Standard deontic obligation [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 130 (0 UL) |
||