References of "Scagliola, Stef"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailTalking with Scholars: Developing a Research Environment for Oral History Collections
Kemman, Max UL; Scagliola, Stef; de Jong, Franciska et al

in Bolikowski, Łukasz; Casarosa, Vittore; Goodale, Paula (Eds.) et al Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries -- TPDL 2013 Selected Workshops (2014)

Detailed reference viewed: 63 (8 UL)
Full Text
See detailJust Google It
Kemman, Max UL; Kleppe, Martijn; Scagliola, Stef

in Mills, Clare; Pidd, Michael; Ward, Esther (Eds.) Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012 (2014)

The transition from analogue to digital archives and the recent explosion of online content offers researchers novel ways of engaging with data. The crucial question for ensuring a balance between the ... [more ▼]

The transition from analogue to digital archives and the recent explosion of online content offers researchers novel ways of engaging with data. The crucial question for ensuring a balance between the supply and demand-side of data is whether this trend connects to existing scholarly practices and to the average search skills of researchers. To gain insight into this process we conducted a survey among nearly three hundred (N= 288) humanities scholars in the Netherlands and Belgium with the aim of finding answers to the following questions: 1) To what extent are digital databases and archives used? 2) What are the preferences in search functionalities 3) Are there differences in search strategies between novices and experts of information retrieval? Our results show that while scholars actively engage in research online they mainly search for text and images. General search systems such as Google and JSTOR are predominant, while large-scale collections such as Europeana are rarely consulted. Searching with keywords is the dominant search strategy and advanced search options are rarely used. When comparing novice and more experienced searchers, the first tend to have a more narrow selection of search engines, and mostly use keywords. Our overall findings indicate that Google is the key player among available search engines. This dominant use illustrates the paradoxical attitude of scholars toward Google: while provenance and context are deemed key academic requirements, the workings of the Google algorithm remain unclear. We conclude that Google introduces a black box into digital scholarly practices, indicating scholars will become increasingly dependent on such black boxed algorithms. This calls for a reconsideration of the academic principles of provenance and context. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 222 (7 UL)
See detailJust Google It - Digital Research Practices of Humanities Scholars (Dataset)
Kemman, Max UL; Kleppe, Martijn; Scagliola, Stef

Textual, factual or bibliographical database (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 89 (7 UL)