![]() ; Robinson, Gavin ![]() Book published by Springer (2021) The legal sector is being hit by profound economic and technological changes (digitalization, open data, blockchain, artificial intelligence ...) forcing law firms and legal departments to become ever ... [more ▼] The legal sector is being hit by profound economic and technological changes (digitalization, open data, blockchain, artificial intelligence ...) forcing law firms and legal departments to become ever more creative in order to demonstrate their added value. To help lawyers meet this challenge, this book draws on the perspectives of lawyers and creative specialists to analyze the concept and life cycle of legal innovations, techniques and services, whether related to legislation, legal engineering, legal services, or legal strategies, as well as the role of law as a source of creativity and interdisciplinary collaboration. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 122 (5 UL)![]() ![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Mitsilegas, Valsamis; Vavoula, Niovi (Eds.) Surveillance and Privacy in the Digital Age: European, Transatlantic and Global Perspectives (2021) Detailed reference viewed: 909 (25 UL)![]() ![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Caianiello, Michele; Camon, Albert (Eds.) Digital Forensic Evidence: Towards Common European Standards in Antifraud Administrative and Criminal Investigations (2021) Detailed reference viewed: 184 (21 UL)![]() Robinson, Gavin ![]() in New Journal of European Criminal Law (2020) When the idea of this special edition occurred to the team behind the New Journal of European Criminal Law, my first thought was to go back through all of Scott Crosby’s contributions in print as editor ... [more ▼] When the idea of this special edition occurred to the team behind the New Journal of European Criminal Law, my first thought was to go back through all of Scott Crosby’s contributions in print as editor-in-chief and see whether a mini-retrospective on the themes and views therein would be worthy of inclusion here – by Scott’s own standards. These notes focus on what gradually became the single biggest concern expressed in Scott’s editorials: the perilous position of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in a post-Brexit UK – in concreto, the prospect of what he labelled ‘Brexit plus’: a British exit from the ECHR system. I begin with Scott’s views on the European Union (EU) Referendum and the Brexit process. Next comes the great uncertainty currently surrounding the future of Convention rights in the United Kingdom, set against the emphasis placed by the editorials on the instrumental role of the ECHR in fostering peace across the whole of Europe, within and beyond the territory of the EU. In the event that Brexit plus should materialise, writing in the wake of polls showing all-time record support in Scotland for secession from the United Kingdom I close by asking whether Scotland might be able to ‘leave a light on for Strasbourg’. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 66 (0 UL)![]() Robinson, Gavin ![]() in New Journal of European Criminal Law (2020), 11(2), 258-261 Detailed reference viewed: 85 (1 UL)![]() Robinson, Gavin ![]() in Robinson, Gavin (Ed.) Blog, Brexit Institute (Dublin City University) (2020) Detailed reference viewed: 192 (6 UL)![]() Robinson, Gavin ![]() in Publicum (2019), 5(2), 184-200 This paper explores the manifold aspects of the draft Terrorist Content Online (‘TCO’) Regulation which are of clear import for the democratic future of the internet insofar as they will reshape the ... [more ▼] This paper explores the manifold aspects of the draft Terrorist Content Online (‘TCO’) Regulation which are of clear import for the democratic future of the internet insofar as they will reshape the boundaries of what is acceptable behavior online and set out tools and procedures for deciding what must be (potentially, pre-emptively) excised from the exchanges taking place there. The piece places particular emphasis on the proposal’s ramifications for legal certainty and freedom of expression in cyberspace. In doing so, it aims to raise the most salient policy concerns, legal difficulties and technological quandaries which ripple out from the EU legislator’s laudable goal of tackling violent and terrorist content online. The article is structured as follows: after a discussion of the foundational concept of “terrorist content” which applies across the board in the draft text (II), we distinguish its headline provisions tightening up service providers’ compliance with orders to remove or disable access to terrorist content (III) from those aspects of the proposal which aim to responsibilise providers to act unassisted against terrorist content, including through the hotly-debated use of proactive measures (IV). A few concluding remarks on the future direction of this live file are offered to close (V). [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 43 (7 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() Report (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 107 (5 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Van Kempen, Piet Hein (Ed.) Overuse in the Criminal Justice System: On Criminalization, Prosecution and Imprisonment (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 182 (9 UL)![]() Robinson, Gavin ![]() in Eucrim (2019), 2018(4), 234-240 In September 2018, the European Commission presented a draft Regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online. The proposal builds upon EU-level initiatives to foster the voluntary ... [more ▼] In September 2018, the European Commission presented a draft Regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online. The proposal builds upon EU-level initiatives to foster the voluntary cooperation of service providers in stopping the dissemination of terrorist content online, and echoes ongoing national developments which go a step further in imposing obligations – underpinned by considerable fines – on service providers. This article describes the main features of the proposal and highlights some of the policy challenges, legal questions and technological concerns it is likely to face on the road to adoption. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 372 (9 UL)![]() Robinson, Gavin ![]() in Ligeti, Katalin; Robinson, Gavin; European Law Institute (Eds.) Preventing and Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in EU Criminal Law (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 105 (9 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() Book published by Oxford University Press (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 203 (25 UL)![]() Robinson, Gavin ![]() in European Data Protection Law Review (2018), 4(3), 347-352 In April 2018, the European Commission presented a legislative package intended to enable, foster and formalise cross-border access by national judicial authorities to electronic evidence controlled by ... [more ▼] In April 2018, the European Commission presented a legislative package intended to enable, foster and formalise cross-border access by national judicial authorities to electronic evidence controlled by private service providers.1 In particular the public-private character of the ‘cooperation’ envisaged in the proposed set-up raises several questions at the interface of criminal procedure and data protection law. This report provides a brief overview of the proposed EUlegislation and an introduction to themost salient attendant legal and policy-related issues. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 162 (16 UL)![]() ![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Kert, Robert; Lehner, Andrea (Eds.) Vielfahlt des Strafrechts im internationalen Kontext: Festschrift für Frank Höpfel zum 65. Geburtstag (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 411 (38 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Carrera, Sergio; Mitsilegas, Valsamis (Eds.) Constitutionalising the Security Union: Effectiveness, rule of law and rights in countering terrorism and crime (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 236 (47 UL)![]() Schmitz, Sandra ![]() ![]() in Taeger, Jürgen (Ed.) Recht 4.0 - Innovationen aus den rechtswissenschaftlichen Laboren (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 216 (12 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Criminology in Europe (2017), 16(2), 11-14 Detailed reference viewed: 196 (11 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Luchtman, Michiel; Vervaele, John (Eds.) Investigatory powers and procedural safeguards: Improving OLAF’s legislative framework through a comparison with other EU law enforcement authorities (ECN/ESMA/ECB) (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 128 (15 UL)![]() Robinson, Gavin ![]() in International Data Privacy Law (2017), 7(1), 48-69 Recent UK legislation facilitating the credit scoring of small and medium-sized enterprises using Big Data techniques and Open Data sources threatens to further hollow out information management norms and ... [more ▼] Recent UK legislation facilitating the credit scoring of small and medium-sized enterprises using Big Data techniques and Open Data sources threatens to further hollow out information management norms and data subject rights enshrined in privacy and data protection law just as it is gathering unprecedented momentum in courts and on statute books across the EU. After examining the economic rationale for such measures and their envisaged impact on the credit risk industry, we argue that the associated regulatory re-shuffling and privacy-related safeguards are highly unlikely to address adequately the serious accuracy, transparency, and accountability concerns of individual data subjects. Would the effective, full enforcement of data protection principles and data subject rights really cripple the credit reference industry to the detriment of the nascent economic recovery, or is there a middle path and will the forthcoming EU General Data Protection Regulation provide it? [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 184 (6 UL)![]() Robinson, Gavin ![]() Doctoral thesis (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 76 (7 UL) |
||