References of "Robaldo, Livio 50008909"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe DAta Protection REgulation COmpliance Model
Bartolini, Cesare UL; Lenzini, Gabriele UL; Robaldo, Livio UL

in IEEE Security and Privacy (2019), 17(6), 37-45

Understanding whether certain technical measures comply with the General Data Protection Regulation’s (GDPR’s) principles is complex legal work. This article describes a model of the GDPR that allows for ... [more ▼]

Understanding whether certain technical measures comply with the General Data Protection Regulation’s (GDPR’s) principles is complex legal work. This article describes a model of the GDPR that allows for semiautomatic processing of legal text and the leveraging of state-of-the-art legal informatics approaches, which are useful for legal reasoning, software design, information retrieval, or compliance checking. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 98 (7 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailLegal Reasoning and Big Data: Opportunities and Challenges
Antoniou, Grigoris; Baryannis, George; Batsakis, Sotiris et al

in Legal Reasoning and Big Data: Opportunities and Challenges (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 76 (4 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPrOnto: Privacy Ontology for Legal Reasoning
palmirani, monica; Martoni, Michele; Rossi, Arianna UL et al

in International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 162 (20 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailLegal Ontology for Modelling GDPR Concepts and Norms
Palmirani, Monica; Bartolini, Cesare UL; Martoni, Michele et al

in JURIX 2018 proceedings (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 130 (19 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailTowards legal compliance by correlating Standards and Laws with a semi-automated methodology
Bartolini, Cesare UL; Giurgiu, Andra UL; Lenzini, Gabriele UL et al

in Bosse, Tibor; Bredeweg, Bert (Eds.) Communications in Computer and Information Science (2017)

Since generally legal regulations do not provide clear parameters to determine when their requirements are met, achieving legal compliance is not trivial. The adoption of standards could help create an ... [more ▼]

Since generally legal regulations do not provide clear parameters to determine when their requirements are met, achieving legal compliance is not trivial. The adoption of standards could help create an argument of compliance in favour of the implementing party, provided there is a clear correspondence between the provisions of a specific standard and the regulation's requirements. However, identifying such correspondences is a complex process which is complicated further by the fact that the established correlations may be overridden in time e.g., because newer court decisions change the interpretation of certain legal provisions. To help solve these problems, we present a framework that supports legal experts in recognizing correlations between provisions in a standard and requirements in a given law. The framework relies on state-of-the-art Natural Language Semantics techniques to process the linguistic terms of the two documents, and maintains a knowledge base of the logic representations of the terms, together with their defeasible correlations, both formal and substantive. An application of the framework is shown by comparing a provision of the European General Data Protection Regulation with the ISO/IEC 27018:2014 standard. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 195 (24 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe European Legal Taxonomy Syllabus: A multi-lingual, multi-level ontology framework to untangle the web of European legal terminology
Ajani, Gianmaria; Boella, Guido; Di Caro, Luigi et al

in Applied Ontology (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 221 (8 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailA Unifying Similarity Measure for Automated Identification of National Implementations of European Union Directives
Nanda, Rohan; Di Caro, Luigi; Boella, Guido et al

in A Unifying Similarity Measure for Automated Identification of National Implementations of European Union Directives (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 205 (17 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOn the Complexity of Input/Output Logic
Robaldo, Livio UL; Sun, Xin

in Journal of Applied Logic (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 76 (4 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailNorm-based deontic logic for access control, some computational results
Sun, Xin; Robaldo, Livio UL

in Future Generation Computer Systems (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 85 (5 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailConcept Recognition in European and National Law
Nanda, Rohan; Siragusa, Giovanni; Di caro, Luigi et al

in proc. of The 30th international conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2017) (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 179 (50 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailTowards legal compliance by correlating Standards and Laws with a semi-automated methodology
Bartolini, Cesare UL; Lenzini, Gabriele UL; Robaldo, Livio UL

in Proceedings of the 28 Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC) (2016, November)

Since legal regulations do not generally provide clear parameters to determine when their requirements are met, achieving legal compliance is not trivial. If there were a clear correspondence between the ... [more ▼]

Since legal regulations do not generally provide clear parameters to determine when their requirements are met, achieving legal compliance is not trivial. If there were a clear correspondence between the provisions of a specific standard and the regulation’s requirements, one could implement the standard to claim a presumption of compliance. However, finding those correspondences is a complex process; additionally, correlations may be overridden in time, for instance, because newer court decisions change the interpretation of certain provisions. To help solve this problem, we present a framework that supports legal experts in recognizing correlations between provisions in a standard and requirements in a given law. The framework relies on state-of-the-art Natural Language Semantics techniques to process the linguistic terms of the two documents, and maintains a knowledge base of the logic representations of the terms, together with their defeasible correlations, both formal and substantive. An application of the framework is shown by comparing a provision of the European General Data Protection Regulation against the ISO/IEC 27018:2014 standard. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 203 (11 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailA Framework to Reason about the Legal Compliance of Security Standards
Bartolini, Cesare UL; Giurgiu, Andra UL; Lenzini, Gabriele UL et al

in Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Juris-informatics (JURISIN) (2016, November)

Achieving compliance with legal regulations is no easy task. Normally, laws state general requirements but do not provide clear parameters to determine when such requirements are met. On a different level ... [more ▼]

Achieving compliance with legal regulations is no easy task. Normally, laws state general requirements but do not provide clear parameters to determine when such requirements are met. On a different level, industrial standards and best practices define specific objectives that can be certified by means of auditing procedures from qualified bodies. Implementing a standard does not per se guarantee legal compliance, with the rare exception when the standard is also endorsed by the law itself. But standards and laws in the same domain may have overlaps and correlations, so adopting the former may provide an argument to demonstrate that adequate measures were taken to achieve legal compliance. In this paper, we introduce a framework that, using state-of-the-art Natural Language Semantics techniques, helps process legal documents and standards to build a knowledge base to store their logic representations, and the correlations between them. The knowledge base will help legal experts assess what requirements of the law are met by the standard and, consequently, recognize what requirements still need to be implemented to fill the remaining gaps. An application of the framework is exemplified by comparing a provision of the European General Data Protection Regulation against the ISO/IEC 27001:2013 standard. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 337 (32 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailNorm Creation in Proposition Control Games
Sun, Xin UL; Robaldo, Livio UL

in Proceedings of the 1st Chinese Conference on Logic and Argumentation (CLAR 2016), Hangzhou, China, April 2-3, 2016. (2016)

Detailed reference viewed: 43 (10 UL)
Full Text
See detailAli Baba and Thief, Norm Emergence in Games
sun, xin; Robaldo, Livio UL

Presentation (2016)

Detailed reference viewed: 46 (4 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailTextual Inference with Deep Learning Technique
Adebayo, Kolawole; Di Caro, Luigi; Robaldo, Livio UL et al

in Proc. of the 28th Annual Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC2016). (2016)

Detailed reference viewed: 110 (5 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailReified Input/Output logic - a position paper
Robaldo, Livio UL; Sun, Xin UL

in proceedings of Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Justice (AI4J), collocated at the 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2016) (2016)

Detailed reference viewed: 47 (8 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEunomos, a legal document and knowledge management system for the Web to provide relevant, reliable and up-to-date information on the Law
Boella, Guido; Di Caro, Luigi; Humphreys, Llio UL et al

in Artificial Intelligence & Law (2016)

Detailed reference viewed: 167 (18 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailMapping Recitals to Normative Provisions in EU Legislation to Assist Legal Interpretation
Humphreys, Llio UL; Santos, Cristiana; Di Caro, Luigi et al

in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (2015)

Detailed reference viewed: 101 (6 UL)