References of "Lockie, Stewart"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailConflicting temporalities of social and environmental change
Lockie, Stewart; Wong, Catherine UL

in Boström, M.; Davidson, D. (Eds.) Environment and Society: Concepts and Challenges. (2018)

This chapter explores how time and temporality – that is, the rhythms and tempos of social and environmental change – have been considered in social theory before going on to explore the conceptual ... [more ▼]

This chapter explores how time and temporality – that is, the rhythms and tempos of social and environmental change – have been considered in social theory before going on to explore the conceptual frameworks and practices through which policy-makers seek to influence temporal processes in the specific context of climate change policy. The chapter highlights conflict between the temporalities of climate change and the temporalities of politics, as well as conflict between the temporalities of competing political and decision-making processes. While policy-makers advocate strategies to depoliticize climate policy in response to these conflicts, the chapter argues this is neither possible nor desirable. Instead, it advocates more democratic and deliberative approaches to the challenge of synchronizing ever more visible ecological temporalities with the multiple temporalities of the social. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 109 (8 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailSociology, Risk and the Environment: A Material-Semiotic Approach
Wong, Catherine UL; Lockie, Stewart

in Journal of Risk Research (2018)

Sociology has made significant contributions to the conceptualisation of risk and critique of technical risk analysis. It has, however, unintentionally reinforced the division of labour between the ... [more ▼]

Sociology has made significant contributions to the conceptualisation of risk and critique of technical risk analysis. It has, however, unintentionally reinforced the division of labour between the natural/technical and social sciences in risk analysis. This paper argues that the problem with conceptualisations of risk is not a misplaced emphasis on calculation. Rather, it is that we have not adequately dealt with ontological distinctions implicit in both sociological and technical work on risk between material or objective risks and our socially-mediated understandings and interpretations of those risks. While acknowledging that risks are simultaneously social and technical, sociologists have not, in practice, provided the conceptual and methodological tools to apprehend risk in a less dualistic manner. This limits our ability both to analyse actors and processes outside the social domain and to explore the recursive relationships between risk calculus, social action and the material outcomes of risk. In response, this paper develops a material-semiotic conceptualisation of risk and provides an assessment of its relevance to more sociologically-informed risk governance. It introduces the ideas of co-constitution, emergent entities and enactment as instruments for reconciling the material and social worlds in a sociological study of risk. It further illustrates the application of a material-semiotic approach using these concepts in the nuclear industry. In deconstructing social-material dualisms in the sociology of risk, this paper argues that a material-semiotic conceptualisation of risk enables both technical and social perspectives on risk not only to co-exist but to collaborate, widening the scope for interdisciplinary research. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 126 (11 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRisk, sustainability and time: sociological perspectives
Wong, Catherine UL; Lockie, Stewart

in Schandl, Heinz; Walker, Iain (Eds.) Social Sciences and Sustainability (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 90 (6 UL)