![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Van Kempen, Piet Hein (Ed.) Overuse in the Criminal Justice System: On Criminalization, Prosecution and Imprisonment (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 80 (6 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() Report (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 38 (1 UL)![]() Giuffrida, Fabio ![]() ![]() Report (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 175 (24 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() in Roksandić Vidlička, Sunčana; Engelhart, Marc (Eds.) Dealing with Terrorism. Empirical and Normative Challenges of Fighting the Islamic State (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 36 (2 UL)![]() ![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() in Brown, Darryl; Iontcheva Turner, Jenia; Weisser, Bettina (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process (2019) This chapter focuses on the place of the public prosecutor in common law and civil law jurisdictions. It first describes the institutional positioning of public prosecutors, particularly vis-à-vis the ... [more ▼] This chapter focuses on the place of the public prosecutor in common law and civil law jurisdictions. It first describes the institutional positioning of public prosecutors, particularly vis-à-vis the executive power, before discussing their role and powers in regard to the pretrial phase. It then considers the increasing tendency to entrust the public prosecutor with quasi-judicial sanctioning powers in the context of out-of-court procedures (“prosecutorial adjudication”). It also examines the role of specialized law enforcement authorities in the exercise of investigative and prosecutorial functions, coercive measures and the need for judicial authorization, and prosecutorial discretion and alternatives to trial proceedings. Finally, it explains how independence, centralization and decentralization, legality and opportunity of prosecution, and the alternatives to trial proceedings have been translated to the supranational design of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 94 (9 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() Book published by Wolters Kluwer - CEDAM (2019) In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the individual liability of senior managers has been rediscovered as an important element in effectively countering economic and financial crime. Mainstream ... [more ▼] In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the individual liability of senior managers has been rediscovered as an important element in effectively countering economic and financial crime. Mainstream enforcement practices against white-collar crime in recent years, focusing mostly on the legal entity or the low- and mid-level employees, have been largely unsuccessful. The punishment of large corporations for economic offences has indeed been confronted with the “too big to jail” dilemma, and with concerns for the negative spillovers that their collapse may entail for employees, shareholders and consumers. The individual “rogue employee”, on the other hand, may be fungible and easily sacrificed as a scapegoat. The recent debate has therefore brought back to centre-stage the individual liability of senior managers, which is essential to close any “responsibility gap”. But are the ordinary rules of criminal law fit and adequate to hold senior managers accountable? This volume, presenting the findings of a study led by the University of Luxembourg and co-financed by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), aims to contribute to this debate with a special focus on the liability of senior managers for the commission of offences against the financial interests of the EU. It compares the criminal liability regimes for senior managers in five Member States (Finland, France, Germany, The Netherlands and Poland) and delivers a set of policy recommendations for establishing the liability of senior managers in compliance with the general principles of criminal law and respect for fundamental rights. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 78 (7 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() Book published by Oxford University Press (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 97 (16 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() E-print/Working paper (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 143 (10 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() Book published by Hart Publishing (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 522 (35 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Vervaele, John; Simonato, Michele; Luchtman, Michiel (Eds.) Exchange of information with EU and national enforcement authorities. Improving OLAF legislative framework through a comparison with other EU authorities (ECN/ESMA/ECB) (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 85 (5 UL)![]() ![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Kert, Robert; Lehner, Andrea (Eds.) Vielfahlt des Strafrechts im internationalen Kontext: Festschrift für Frank Höpfel zum 65. Geburtstag (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 230 (32 UL)![]() ![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() in Ligeti, Katalin; Robinson, Gavin; ELI (European Law Institute) (Eds.) Preventing and Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in EU Criminal Law (2018) This chapter analyses the conceptual roots of extended ne bis in idem protection and, in particular, how the concept of ‘criminal charge’ developed by the ECtHR impacts the interpretative outcomes of the ... [more ▼] This chapter analyses the conceptual roots of extended ne bis in idem protection and, in particular, how the concept of ‘criminal charge’ developed by the ECtHR impacts the interpretative outcomes of the CJEU and the ECtHR respectively. The chapter will then present the specific case law of the two Courts on extended ne bis in idem, including the latest developments, and will offer an assessment of the consequences of this jurisprudence for transnational cases in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ). In particular, the transnational application of extended ne bis in idem requires a reconceptualisation and rethinking of the legal framework for preventing and resolving conflicts of criminal jurisdiction in the AFSJ. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 41 (3 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() Book published by Hart Publishing (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 134 (12 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() in Ligeti, Katalin; Tosza, Stanislaw (Eds.) White Collar Crime. A Comparative Perspective (2018) This chapter by Katalin Ligeti and Stanislaw Tosza provides a synthesis of the main findings of the book edited by the two authors (White Collar Crime. A Comparative Perspective, Hart Publishing, 2018 ... [more ▼] This chapter by Katalin Ligeti and Stanislaw Tosza provides a synthesis of the main findings of the book edited by the two authors (White Collar Crime. A Comparative Perspective, Hart Publishing, 2018). The chapter first presents the challenges in investigating and prosecuting economic and financial crime (section II). The analysis of four national systems (France, Poland, Sweden, and the US) complemented by the information provided in the transversal chapters led to the identification of four major tendencies in the field in response to these challenges (section III): the swinging of enforcement strategies between prosecuting individuals or/and corporations (section III.A); the extension of punitive sanctions and the use of compliance programmes as punishment (section III.B); the extensive use of alternatives to criminal proceedings (section III.C); and the increased role of private actors in controlling economic and financial crime (section III.D). In section 4, these responses are scrutinised from the perspective of the human rights regime. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 83 (0 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Carrera, Sergio; Mitsilegas, Valsamis (Eds.) Constitutionalising the Security Union: Effectiveness, rule of law and rights in countering terrorism and crime (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 149 (36 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() Report (2017) This paper provides an analysis of two crucial and interconnected aspects of the current legal framework on the investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): the procedural safeguards ... [more ▼] This paper provides an analysis of two crucial and interconnected aspects of the current legal framework on the investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): the procedural safeguards for the individuals subject to the administrative investigations conducted by OLAF and the admissibility in evidence of OLAF Final Reports in national criminal proceedings. The state of the art and its shortcomings are analysed in the double perspective of the coherent protection of the EU’s financial interests and of the respect of fundamental rights provided by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 111 (17 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Criminology in Europe (2017), 16(2), 11-14 Detailed reference viewed: 140 (9 UL)![]() Ligeti, Katalin ![]() ![]() in Luchtman, Michiel; Vervaele, John (Eds.) Investigatory powers and procedural safeguards: Improving OLAF’s legislative framework through a comparison with other EU law enforcement authorities (ECN/ESMA/ECB) (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 71 (14 UL) |
||