References of "Hofmann, Frank 50001999"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailFake News und unsere epistemische Grundsituation
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Bendheim, Amelie; Pavlik, Jennifer (Eds.) 'Fake News' in Literatur und Medien (2022)

Detailed reference viewed: 35 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailExplaining free will by rational capacities
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (2022), 25

Detailed reference viewed: 43 (4 UL)
Full Text
See detailMoral status and teleofunctional kinds
Hofmann, Frank UL

Presentation (2021, November)

Detailed reference viewed: 35 (1 UL)
Full Text
See detailExperts, specialists, and recommendations: comment on Grundmann on expertise
Hofmann, Frank UL

Presentation (2021, August)

Detailed reference viewed: 30 (0 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailFreiheit und Unfreiheit in der Sklaverei - eine philosophische Analyse
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Binsfeld, Andrea; Ghetta, Marcello (Eds.) Sklaverei und Identitäten. Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart (2021)

Detailed reference viewed: 21 (1 UL)
See detailSome reflections on the flow of knowledge in digital history
Hofmann, Frank UL

Diverse speeches and writings (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 49 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailIs evidence normative?
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Philosophia (2020)

This paper defends the view that in a certain sense evidence is normative. Neither a bit of evidence nor the fact that it is evidence for a certain proposition is a normative fact, but it is still the ... [more ▼]

This paper defends the view that in a certain sense evidence is normative. Neither a bit of evidence nor the fact that it is evidence for a certain proposition is a normative fact, but it is still the case that evidence provides normative reason for belief. An argument for the main thesis will be presented. It will rely on evidentialist norms of belief and a Broomean conception of normative reasons. Two important objections will be discussed, one from A. Steglich-Petersen on whether having evidence is sufficient for having a normative reason for belief and another one from S. Street. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 84 (4 UL)
See detailReflexionen über Corona und die ökologische Situation des Menschen
Hofmann, Frank UL

Article for general public (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 36 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDiscussion Note on The Rationality of Perception (Siegel)
Hofmann, Frank UL; Orlando, Andy UL

in Grazer Philosophische Studien (2019), 96(2),

Detailed reference viewed: 40 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKrankheit in Denkfiguren: Eine Normative Untersuchung
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Figurationen von Krankheiten (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 27 (2 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailNorm reasons and evidentialism
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Analysis (2019), 96(2),

Detailed reference viewed: 42 (1 UL)
Full Text
See detailProblems of epistemic and practical consequentialism
Hofmann, Frank UL

Presentation (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 36 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailE=K and nonepistemic percpetion
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Logos and Episteme: an International Journal of Epistemology (2018), IX(3), 307-31

Detailed reference viewed: 39 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailHow to know one's experiences transparently
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Philosophical Studies (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 115 (3 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEvolution and Ethics: no Streetian debunking of moral realism
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Croatian Journal of Philosophy (2018), 18(3), 417-432

Detailed reference viewed: 32 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCould robots be phenomenally conscious?
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 136 (4 UL)
Full Text
See detailTatsachen, Fakten und Sachverhalte
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Schrenk, Markus (Ed.) Handbuch Metaphysik (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 65 (0 UL)