References of "Hofmann, Frank 50001999"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
See detailSome reflections on the flow of knowledge in digital history
Hofmann, Frank UL

Diverse speeches and writings (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 30 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailIs evidence normative?
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Philosophia (2020)

This paper defends the view that in a certain sense evidence is normative. Neither a bit of evidence nor the fact that it is evidence for a certain proposition is a normative fact, but it is still the ... [more ▼]

This paper defends the view that in a certain sense evidence is normative. Neither a bit of evidence nor the fact that it is evidence for a certain proposition is a normative fact, but it is still the case that evidence provides normative reason for belief. An argument for the main thesis will be presented. It will rely on evidentialist norms of belief and a Broomean conception of normative reasons. Two important objections will be discussed, one from A. Steglich-Petersen on whether having evidence is sufficient for having a normative reason for belief and another one from S. Street. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 56 (3 UL)
See detailReflexionen über Corona und die ökologische Situation des Menschen
Hofmann, Frank UL

Article for general public (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 22 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKrankheit in Denkfiguren: Eine Normative Untersuchung
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Figurationen von Krankheiten (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 18 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailNorm reasons and evidentialism
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Analysis (2019), 96(2),

Detailed reference viewed: 27 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDiscussion Note on The Rationality of Perception (Siegel)
Hofmann, Frank UL; Orlando, Andy UL

in Grazer Philosophische Studien (2019), 96(2),

Detailed reference viewed: 26 (1 UL)
Full Text
See detailProblems of epistemic and practical consequentialism
Hofmann, Frank UL

Presentation (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 22 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailE=K and nonepistemic percpetion
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Logos and Episteme: an International Journal of Epistemology (2018), IX(3), 307-31

Detailed reference viewed: 26 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailHow to know one's experiences transparently
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Philosophical Studies (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 84 (2 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEvolution and Ethics: no Streetian debunking of moral realism
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Croatian Journal of Philosophy (2018), 18(3), 417-432

Detailed reference viewed: 18 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCould robots be phenomenally conscious?
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 113 (4 UL)
Full Text
See detailTatsachen, Fakten und Sachverhalte
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Schrenk, Markus (Ed.) Handbuch Metaphysik (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 49 (0 UL)
Full Text
See detailThe Role of Consciousness For Epistemic Agency
Hofmann, Frank UL

Presentation (2015, December 04)

In this presentation, I argue for a conception of rational capacities that makes us epistemic agents without essential reference or appeal to self-consciousness/self-knowledge, contrary to McDowell, Moran ... [more ▼]

In this presentation, I argue for a conception of rational capacities that makes us epistemic agents without essential reference or appeal to self-consciousness/self-knowledge, contrary to McDowell, Moran, and others. At the same time, his conception of rational capacities as powers at the personal level saves our epistemic agency against worries that Hilary Kornblith has put forward. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 116 (2 UL)
Full Text
See detailVirtue and knowledge
Hofmann, Frank UL

Presentation (2015, November 11)

The presentation defends a fullblooded, 'thick' virtue-theoretic account of epistemic normativity. If we think of beliefs as under the control of rational agents, by means of their rational capacities ... [more ▼]

The presentation defends a fullblooded, 'thick' virtue-theoretic account of epistemic normativity. If we think of beliefs as under the control of rational agents, by means of their rational capacities, the norm of excellence (or 'virtue') applies to doxastic action as well as any other rational action. An argument is presented to the effect that the knowledge norm is the right norm of belief. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 90 (4 UL)
Full Text
See detailIntentionalism and disjunctivism about perception
Hofmann, Frank UL

Presentation (2015, September 16)

Detailed reference viewed: 92 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailNon-conceptual knowledge
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Philosophical Issues (2014)

Detailed reference viewed: 158 (4 UL)
Full Text
See detailPerceptual justification and non-conceptual perception
Hofmann, Frank UL

Presentation (2014, September 26)

Detailed reference viewed: 80 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe structuring causes of behavior: Has Dretske saved mental causation?
Hofmann, Frank UL; Schulte, Peter

in Acta Analytica (2014), 29(3), 267-284

Detailed reference viewed: 132 (3 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailGettier for Justification
Hofmann, Frank UL

in Episteme (2014), 11(3), 305-318

Detailed reference viewed: 115 (1 UL)