References of "Heuschling, Luc 50001980"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailAndorra: eine Einherrschaft? Monarch: ein Einzelorgan? Der Verfall des Begriffsmerkmals „monos“ in Europas sogenannten „Monarchien“
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Bussjäger, Peter; Gamper, Anna (Eds.) 100 Jahre Liechtensteinische Verfassung (2022)

Detailed reference viewed: 47 (2 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEr ist Prinz. – Mehr noch: Er ist Mensch! Er ist Stimmbürger. Stimmrecht des Monarchen als Dispersionsprisma einer rechtswissenschaftlichen Monarchieanalyse
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Zeitschrift für Offentliches Recht (2021, December), 76(4), 1241-1289

In the literature on comparative constitutional law and constitutional theory, monarchies are, if they attract any attention at all, most frequently analyzed from the perspective of the monarch’s ... [more ▼]

In the literature on comparative constitutional law and constitutional theory, monarchies are, if they attract any attention at all, most frequently analyzed from the perspective of the monarch’s political power, after its more or less extensive “neutralization” in the name of the constitutional ideals of Enlightenment. Yet this classic approach, whose focus lies on the State organ’s competencies and the discretion of its royal incumbent, is incomplete as it ignores a second, increasingly important facet of the modernization process of monarchies: To what extent do Royals, including the monarch, have fundamental rights as individuals, as “human beings”? This paper considers in particular the even-more-overlooked issue of their political rights (right to vote, right to stand for election, and the right to use the instruments of direct democracy). The issue, which is a very old one, having being addressed first by Sieyès in his famous 1789 speech on royal veto and by the French Constitution of 1791, is far from being odd or futile. In some jurisdictions, like in Japan (1945), Luxembourg (2004-5), Liechtenstein (2002-3) or in Thailand (2019), it was at the core of quite controversial public debates which, eventually, lead to totally divergent outcomes. Beyond its (relative) importance in practice, it is a key parameter for theoretical purposes: combined with the criteria of the dualistic state organization, it provides a deeper insight into the complex structure of those regimes mixing, in various ways, both monarchical and democratic elements. This article sheds light on this new research field, starting with a broad historical and comparative survey, before presenting a typology in order to tackle the startling diversity of legal solutions. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 133 (16 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detail‘État de droit’ : The Gallicization of the Rechtsstaat
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Meierhenrich, Jens; Loughlin, Martin (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law (2021)

Since the Enlightenment, the innumerous debates in Europe on nomocracy have been led under various flagship terms, whose diversity can be boiled down to four types of key terms: 1. “State”; 2. “Republic” ... [more ▼]

Since the Enlightenment, the innumerous debates in Europe on nomocracy have been led under various flagship terms, whose diversity can be boiled down to four types of key terms: 1. “State”; 2. “Republic”; 3. expressions suggesting that it is “law” that “rules”, “reigns”; 4. linguistic constructs connecting both words “law” and “State”. The German term Rechtsstaat, which is the most famous but not unique example of the fourth category, has gained progressively a worldwide resonance. By literally translating it, granting it a paramount position in their Constitution, and abandoning their traditional key word(s), many countries have germanized their legal language. Have they also germanized their legal mindset, their law? If so, to what extent, and how, and for what reason? Goes the current Germanization of our language hand in hand with a fundamental move towards a new understanding of the Constitution (i.e. judicialization of politics)? Or is the transnational (“global”) buzz about Rechtsstaat just a fashion, jurists importing the trendy German term but not its content? Or do they mix, and partially innovate, when operating this “transfer/translation”? These fundamental issues will be analyzed in the case of France, which is particularly interesting as, since 1789, France perceived itself as a universal model (of its own understanding of nomocracy), and not as an importer, especially not of German legal terms, theories and solutions. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 332 (23 UL)
Full Text
See detailDe la naissance de l’État luxembourgeois. Analyse et historique de la problématique
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Actes de la section des sciences morales et politiques de l'Institut grand-ducal (2021), Vol XXIV

Detailed reference viewed: 106 (7 UL)
Full Text
See detailUn nouveau type, insolite, de refus de sanction : l’inaction du roi Baudouin en 1990 et du grand-duc Henri en 2008
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Semper perseverans. Liber Amicorum André Alen (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 137 (14 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailLuxembourg: Grand-Duke Henri’s refusal, in 2008, to sign the bill legalizing euthanasia
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Hazell, Robert; Morris, Bob (Eds.) The Role of Monarchy in Modern Democracy. European Monarchies Compared (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 421 (35 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPenser l’impensable. Le droit de vote des étrangers aux élections nationales dans le contexte multinational du Luxembourg et dans le contexte fédéral de l’Union européenne
Heuschling, Luc UL

in XIIème séminaire franco-japonais de droit public, Université d'Hiroshima 15-17 mars 2018 (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 80 (2 UL)
Full Text
See detailLe discours de Charles-Mathias Simons du 23 octobre 1856 : une première théorisation du monisme avec primauté du droit international
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Frieseisen, Claude; Jungblut, Marie-Paule; Pauly, Michel (Eds.) La volonté de la Chambre qui est la volonté du pays. Un florilège de débats parlementaires luxembourgeois (1848-2008) (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 214 (9 UL)
Full Text
See detailUne cour constitutionnelle différente des autres. Etendue, raisons & avenir de l'originalité de la Cour constitutionnelle luxembourgeoise
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Gerkrath, Jörg (Ed.) Les 20 ans de la Cour Constitutionnelle: trop jeune pour mourir? (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 571 (52 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailUne éducation globalisée, ab initio, de tous les juristes : le Bachelor en droit de l’Université du Luxembourg
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Vogliotti, Massimo (Ed.) Pour une nouvelle éducation juridique (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 289 (46 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCompte rendu de Ph. Poirier (dir.), Les pouvoirs d’un parlement. La Chambre des députés du Luxembourg, Promoculture-Larcier, Windhof, 2014
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Hemecht : Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte = Revue d'Histoire Luxembourgeoise (2018), 70(4), 101-104

Detailed reference viewed: 118 (5 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailLa désignation des Gouvernants au Grand-Duché du Luxembourg
Poirier, Philippe UL; Heuschling, Luc UL

in Derosier, Jean-Philippe (Ed.) La désignation des gouvernants (2017)

Il inclut la désignation des Chefs d'État, de façon élective ou non, la désignation des Chefs de Gouvernement et celle des membres de ce dernier, l'élection des assemblées qui ont un impact sur la ... [more ▼]

Il inclut la désignation des Chefs d'État, de façon élective ou non, la désignation des Chefs de Gouvernement et celle des membres de ce dernier, l'élection des assemblées qui ont un impact sur la composition des Gouvernements. Les démocraties modernes sont régulièrement confrontés à un renouvellement de leurs gouvernants. Le débat récurrent sur les primaires, qu'elles concernent les prochaines élections présidentielles ou les élections locales, le déroulement passé ou proche d'élections dans de nombreux pays (États-Unis, France, Allemagne, peut-être Italie, Royaume-Uni, Turquie, etc.) marquent toute l'actualité de ce sujet. Une confrontation des règles et de leurs applications dans divers pays commande de s'arrêter sur trois de ses aspects : la présélection, soit la désignation de candidats ; le choix, soit la désignation proprement dite ; le contrôle, soit la garantie d'une désignation réelle et non faussée. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 201 (6 UL)
Full Text
See detailDe la réforme du Conseil d'Etat. Un éclairage critique
Heuschling, Luc UL

Article for general public (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 616 (68 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe Complex Relationship between Administrative Law and Constitutional Law. A Comparative and Historical Analysis
Heuschling, Luc UL

in von Bogdandy, Armin; Huber, Peter Michael; Cassese, Sabino (Eds.) The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol. 1 The Administrative State (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 492 (23 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCompte rendu de M. Feyereisen, B.L. Pochon, L'Etat du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Promoculture/Larcier, 2015.
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Hemecht : Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte = Revue d'Histoire Luxembourgeoise (2017), 69(3-4), 467-469

Detailed reference viewed: 162 (14 UL)
Full Text
See detailLes origines au XIXe siècle du rang supra-constitutionnel des traités en droit luxembourgeois: l'enjeu de la monarchie
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Riassetto, Isabelle; Heuschling, Luc; Ravarani, Georges (Eds.) Liber amicorum Rusen Ergec (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 582 (104 UL)