![]() ![]() Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in Johan van Benthem on Logic and Information Dynamics (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 143 (0 UL)![]() Parent, Xavier ![]() Book published by Springer (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 51 (3 UL)![]() ![]() ; ; Elrakaiby, Yehia ![]() in Normative Multi-Agent Systems (2013) Detailed reference viewed: 108 (15 UL)![]() Aucher, Guillaume ![]() in Proceedings of Dagstuhl Seminar (2009, November 03), 09121 Building on a simple modal logic of context, the paper presents a dynamic logic characterizing operations of contraction and expansion on theories. We investigate the mathematical properties of the logic ... [more ▼] Building on a simple modal logic of context, the paper presents a dynamic logic characterizing operations of contraction and expansion on theories. We investigate the mathematical properties of the logic, and use it to develop an axiomatic and semantic analysis of norm change in normative systems. The proposed analysis advances the state of the art by providing a formal semantics of norm-change which, at the same time, takes into account several different aspects of the phenomenon, such as permission and obligation dynamics, as well as the dynamics of classificatory rules. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 50 (3 UL)![]() Aucher, Guillaume ![]() in Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (2009) Building on a simple modal logic of context, the paper presents a dynamic logic characterizing operations of contraction and expansion on theories. We investigate the mathematical properties of the logic ... [more ▼] Building on a simple modal logic of context, the paper presents a dynamic logic characterizing operations of contraction and expansion on theories. We investigate the mathematical properties of the logic, and show how it can capture some aspects of the dynamics of normative systems once they are viewed as logical theories. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 40 (0 UL)![]() ; Pigozzi, Gabriella ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2009) Distributive systems consisting of autonomous and intelligent components need to be able to reason and make decisions based on the information these components share. Judgment aggregation investigates how ... [more ▼] Distributive systems consisting of autonomous and intelligent components need to be able to reason and make decisions based on the information these components share. Judgment aggregation investigates how individual judgments on logically connected propositions can be aggregated into a collective judgment on the same propositions. It is the case that seemingly reasonable aggregation procedures may force the group to hold an inconsistent judgment set. What happens when the agents realize that the group outcome will be inconsistent? We claim that, in order to avoid an untenable collective outcome, individuals may prefer to declare a non-truthful, less preferred judgment set. Thus, the prospect of an individual trying to manipulate the social outcome by submitting an insincere judgment set is turned from being an undesirable to a “virtuous” (or white) manipulation. We define white manipulation and present the initial study of it as a coordinated action of the whole group. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 106 (1 UL) |
||