References of "Blount, Kelly 50034513"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
See detailExpanding traditional enforcement designs to actors across the public-private divide: the example of criminal law
Blount, Kelly UL

in Studies on Enforcement in Multilevel Regulatory Systems (2022)

Detailed reference viewed: 20 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailUsing Artificial Intelligence to Prevent Crime: implications for due process and criminal justice
Blount, Kelly UL

in AI and Society (2022)

Detailed reference viewed: 38 (2 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailApplying the Presumption of Innocence to Policing with AI
Blount, Kelly UL

in International Review of Penal Law (2021), 92(1),

This paper argues that predictive policing, which relies upon former arrest records, hinders the future application of the presumption of innocence. This is established by positing that predictive ... [more ▼]

This paper argues that predictive policing, which relies upon former arrest records, hinders the future application of the presumption of innocence. This is established by positing that predictive policing is comparable to traditional criminal investigations in substance and scope. Police records generally do not clarify whether former charges result in dismissal or acquittal, or conversely, conviction. Therefore, police as state actors may unlawfully act in reliance on an individual’s former arrest record, despite a favourable disposition. Accordingly, it is argued that the presumption of innocence as a fair trial right may be effectively nullified by predictive policing. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 181 (9 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailSeeking Compatibility in Preventing Crime with Artificial Intelligence and Ensuring a Fair Trial
Blount, Kelly UL

in Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology (2021), 15(1), 25-51

The justice system is increasingly reliant on new technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI). In the field of criminal law this also extends to the methods utilized by police for preventing crime ... [more ▼]

The justice system is increasingly reliant on new technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI). In the field of criminal law this also extends to the methods utilized by police for preventing crime. Though policing is not explicitly covered by Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights, this article will demonstrate that there can be adverse effects of policing on fair trial rights and make the analogy to criminal investigations as a recognized pre-trial process. Specifically, it will argue that policing that relies on AI to predict crime has direct effects on fair trial processes such as the equality of arms, the presumption of innocence, and the right to confront the evidence produced against a defendant. It will conclude by challenging the notion that AI is always an appropriate tool for legal processes. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 67 (3 UL)
See detailPrison in Iran, a known unknown, By Nahid Rahimipour Anaraki
Blount, Kelly UL

in Crime, Law and Social Change (2021), 76(2), 215-218

Detailed reference viewed: 51 (0 UL)
See detailDetermining Pretrial Detention by Algorithm: The Lesser of Two Evils?
Blount, Kelly UL

Article for general public (2021)

Detailed reference viewed: 56 (0 UL)
See detailSmoke but no fire, convicting the innocent of crimes that never happened. By Jessica S. Henry (University of California Press)
Blount, Kelly UL

in Crime, Law and Social Change (2020), 75(4), 411-414

Detailed reference viewed: 73 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailForfeiting legal protections to prevent crime? The case of artificial intelligence and predictive policing
Blount, Kelly UL

in Católica Law Review (2020), 4(3), 51-82

Detailed reference viewed: 35 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailBody Worn Cameras with Facial Recognition Technology: When It Constitutes a Search
Blount, Kelly UL

in Criminal Law Practitioner (2017), III(IV Fall), 61-81

This paper argues that the advent of body cameras with real-time, facial recognition technology may constitute a violation of the Fourth Amendment. As this technology is rapidly evolving, law and policy ... [more ▼]

This paper argues that the advent of body cameras with real-time, facial recognition technology may constitute a violation of the Fourth Amendment. As this technology is rapidly evolving, law and policy continues to grapple with proper implementation. This paper suggests that the courts will play an increasingly important role in making relevant constitutional determinations. Using recent Supreme Court case law, the paper surveys several ways in which courts may hold on the issue of body worn cameras and related technologies, depending on their approach. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 155 (4 UL)