References of "Banfi, Mike"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
See detailEurpean Mandate M515, CEN/TC250/SC4.T6 - Background Documents for prEN 1994-1-1
Schäfer, Markus UL; Hicks, Stephen; Kurz, Wolfgang et al

Report (2022)

Background Documents for prEN 1994-1-1

Detailed reference viewed: 65 (2 UL)
Full Text
See detailDraft for second generation of prEN 1994-1-1, November 2021
Schäfer, Markus UL; Hicks, Stephen; Kurz, Wolfgang et al

Report (2021)

Development of second generation for Eurocode 4, part 1: prEN 1994-1-1: November 2021- Draft + Respons on comments

Detailed reference viewed: 71 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailLimitations of plastic bending resistance for composite beams deviated from strain-limitation
Schäfer, Markus UL; Zhang, Qingjie UL; Braun, Matthias et al

in Journal of Constructional Steel Research (2021), 180(106562),

Due to the demand for sustainable constructions, composite structures have become more important and lead to slim and economic solutions with a low structural self-weight. EN 1994-1-1 distinguishes ... [more ▼]

Due to the demand for sustainable constructions, composite structures have become more important and lead to slim and economic solutions with a low structural self-weight. EN 1994-1-1 distinguishes between four different cross-section classes for the determination of moment resistance. For the plastic moment resistance, it is assumed, that each cross-sectional fibre can plastify without any limit on the strain. For standard composite beams with sagging moments and a high plastic neutral axis, plastic resistance and strain-limited resistance give similar results. For sections with a large compression zone height xpl and limited rotation capacity, concrete failure in the compression zone can occur before the plastic moment resistance Mpl,Rd, is reached. The strain limit design becomes critical. This paper points out the impact of the concrete part on the design of composite beams. A parametric study comparing plastic and strain limited moment resistance of a considerable variety of cross-sections has been carried out to develop the beam design methods considering compression zone height for the next generation of Eurocodes. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 82 (7 UL)
Full Text
See detailDraft prEN 1994-1-1: 042020 + comments, Document
Schäfer, Markus UL; Hicks, Stephen; Banfi, Mike et al

Report (2020)

Development of second generation for Eurocode 4, part 1: prEN 1994-1-1: April 2020

Detailed reference viewed: 158 (5 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPLASTIC DESIGN FOR COMPOSITE BEAMS - ARE THERE ANY LIMITS?
Schäfer, Markus UL; Zhang, Qingjie UL; Braun et al

in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Steel and Aluminium Structures ICSAS19 (2019, July)

Due to the demand for sustainable constructions, composite structures have become more important and lead to slim and economic solutions with a low structural self-weight. EN 1994-1-1 differentiate four ... [more ▼]

Due to the demand for sustainable constructions, composite structures have become more important and lead to slim and economic solutions with a low structural self-weight. EN 1994-1-1 differentiate four different cross-section classes for the determination of moment resistance. For the plastic design of the moment resistance it is assumed, that each cross-sectional fibre can plastify without any limitation of the strains. For standard composite beams in case of sagging moments and a high-lying plastic neutral axis, plastic design and strain-limited design give similar results. In the case of sections with a large compression zone height xpl and limited rotation capacity, a concrete failure in the compression zone can occur before the plastic moment resistance Mpl,Rd, is reached. The strain limit design becomes decisive. This paper points out the impact of the concrete part on the design of composite beams. A parametric study comparing plastic and strain limited moment resistance of a considerable variety of cross-sections has been carried out to develop the beam design methods considering high compression zone height of next generation of Eurocodes. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 194 (14 UL)
Full Text
See detailProject Team SC4 T6 interim reports April 2019 Draft EN 1994-1-1
Schäfer, Markus UL; Banfi, Mike; Hicks, Stephen et al

Report (2019)

April draft of second generation for Eurocode 4: EN 1994-1-1; Outcome from SC4.T6

Detailed reference viewed: 130 (6 UL)
See detailCEN/TC250/SC4.T1: Second Generation of Eurocode 4: Introduction and Amendments to Final Draft October 2017
Banfi, Mike; Mensinger, Martin; Schäfer, Markus UL et al

Report (2017)

Development of second Generation of Eurocode 4, Projectteam CEN/TC250/SC4/T1, Reports for final Draft October 2017

Detailed reference viewed: 210 (10 UL)
See detailCEN/TC250/SC4.T1: Second Generation of Eurocode 4: Introduction and Amendments to Second Draft April 2017
Banfi, Mike; Mensinger, Martin; Schäfer, Markus UL et al

Report (2017)

Development of second Generation of Eurocode 4, Projectteam CEN/TC250/SC4/T1, Reports for second Draft April 2017

Detailed reference viewed: 56 (3 UL)
Full Text
See detailBackground Report to EN 1994 - Plastic moment resistance of composite beams
Schäfer, Markus UL; Banfi, Mike

Report (2017)

As part of the development of the second generation of Eurocodes and harmonization of the different European Codes, some clarifications deal with the design value of concrete compression strength and the ... [more ▼]

As part of the development of the second generation of Eurocodes and harmonization of the different European Codes, some clarifications deal with the design value of concrete compression strength and the bending design of steel-composite sections. The following background document describes the issues in design and confusions between Eurocode 2 for the design of concrete structures and Eurocode 4 for the design of composite structures in steel and concrete. The first part is concentrated on the background information and the accentuation of limits for plastic bending design. While the second part represents the results of multiple comparisons between plastic and strain limited design leading to a new design approach. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 86 (3 UL)
See detailCEN/TC250/SC4.T1: Second Generation of Eurocode 4: Assessment of Nationally Determined Parameters in EN 1994
Banfi, Mike; Mensinger, Martin; Ortega, Miguel et al

Report (2016)

Development of second Generation of Eurocode 4, Projectteam CEN/TC250/SC4/T1, Assessment of Nationally Determined Parameters in EN 1994

Detailed reference viewed: 68 (4 UL)
See detailCEN/TC250/SC4.T1:Assessment of the systematic review for Eurocode 4 by Projectteam SC4.T1
Banfi, Mike; Mensinger, Martin; Schäfer, Markus UL et al

Report (2016)

Development of second Generation of Eurocode 4, Projetcteam CEN/TC250/SC4/T1, Comments and Assemenent of review from Industries to EN 1994-1-1, EN 1994-1-2, EN 1994-2

Detailed reference viewed: 73 (2 UL)