![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() E-print/Working paper (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 121 (2 UL)![]() ![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Scientific Conference (2016, October 05) Mobility is a central force shaping Higher Education today. Figures about international outlook of universities are particularly eloquent in depicting how diverse universities have become. These figures ... [more ▼] Mobility is a central force shaping Higher Education today. Figures about international outlook of universities are particularly eloquent in depicting how diverse universities have become. These figures show how many students are on the move as well as their motivation and aspirations. They allow identifying where the sojourners are from or move to. While this “big data” is essential to map the flow of students who cross national borders every year to get an education, there is information that is more difficult to address from this quantitative perspective. Namely, it is difficult to account for the experience of individuals who aspire to move to study, but in the end, cannot and therefore remain immobile (Carling 2002, Juffermans & Tavares 2016). Such a situation, however, is not infrequent, and affect particularly students of the Global South, especially with the recent changes of focus in internationalization policies (Knight & de Wit 1995) which makes it harder for them to access Universities in Europe. In this paper, following Lindquist et al. (2012), we take the view that to understand these processes of (im)mobility, it is perhaps useful to get away from the typical studies of regulations of borders and identities in migration study, and to focus instead on the routes, the modes of transportation, the infrastructures and the brokers which make mobility (im)possible. In order to do that, we adopt a multisited and relational ethnographic approach (Marcus 1998, Desmond, 2014), examining the admission process to a Master programme in Luxembourg, and the trajectory of applicants from Guinea Bissau to this programme. In following the trajectory of four applicants, we examine the practices, discourses, infrastructures and people that help move these students towards Luxembourg or on the contrary, erect borders that become impossible to cross for them. In our analysis, we draw from discourse analysis, human geography, social semiotics and intervention studies, to analyse the chains of material-physical practices as well as the semiotic realities facilitating or hindering movement. Understanding better these chains and connections, we argue, allows to see if there are nodes/points on the road that are more crucial, that is, points where talk, texts, or objects have the power to close down or opening up the routes (R. Scollon, 2012). On an empirical level, we examine longitudinally the trajectory of three students as a means to open up what Lindquist et al. (2012) call the “black box” of migration. On a theoretical level, we seek to contribute to the development of nexus analysis—an interdisciplinary framework that takes actions, mediations, processes and relation as central units for analysts interested in understanding the roots of social change (Scollon & Scollon, 2004). On a methodological level, we propose concrete steps for a study of routes and mobility revealing the permeability/ impermeability and relational nature of borders in higher education. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 65 (2 UL)![]() ![]() ; de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Scientific Conference (2016, January 18) Detailed reference viewed: 54 (0 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Article for general public (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 66 (5 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Presentation (2015, December 04) Detailed reference viewed: 81 (0 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Presentation (2015, November 30) Detailed reference viewed: 98 (1 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Speeches/Talks (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 84 (3 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Presentation (2015, October 07) Detailed reference viewed: 77 (2 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Presentation (2015, September) Detailed reference viewed: 124 (7 UL)![]() ![]() ; de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Scientific Conference (2015, July) Detailed reference viewed: 136 (2 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Conference given outside the academic context (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 98 (4 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Presentation (2015, March) Detailed reference viewed: 100 (2 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Presentation (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 127 (1 UL)![]() ; de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() in Lingue Culture Mediazioni = Languages Cultures Mediation (2015), 2(1), 115-134 Detailed reference viewed: 150 (5 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Article for general public (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 113 (11 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Presentation (2014, October 09) Detailed reference viewed: 51 (1 UL)![]() Morys, Nancy ![]() ![]() ![]() Book published by Peter Lang (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 354 (35 UL)![]() ![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Scientific Conference (2014, September) Detailed reference viewed: 73 (2 UL)![]() ![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() Scientific Conference (2014, June 23) Detailed reference viewed: 78 (4 UL)![]() de Saint-Georges, Ingrid ![]() in Dispagne, Michel (Ed.) Espaces sociaux, pratiques langagières et mise(s) en scène du travail (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 157 (3 UL) |
||