References of "Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine 50002142"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailImpression formation or prediction? Category fit and task influence forensic person memory.
Glock, Sabine UL; Kneer, Julia; Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL

in Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice (2011), 11

We experimentally investigated whether forensic psychologists differ from laymen in their use of heuristic and integrated information processing depending on the given task and category fit of information ... [more ▼]

We experimentally investigated whether forensic psychologists differ from laymen in their use of heuristic and integrated information processing depending on the given task and category fit of information. Participants’ task was either forming an impression or predicting the development of a fictitious rapist and a fictitious robber-and-murderer. Case report recall was measured. Results showed that experts processed the rapist’s information heuristically when offender information fit the category and the task required impression formation. In contrast, laymen did not apply the offender categories and processed all the information using an integrated strategy. When predicting the development of an offender, forensic psychologists integrated all relevant information. The robber-and-murderer information was always processed using an integrated strategy. The practical relevance of the results is discussed. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 162 (14 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailDiagnostic competence in school transition recommendations
Gräsel, Cornelia; Nölle, Ines; Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL et al

Scientific Conference (2010, October)

Detailed reference viewed: 42 (0 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailInformationssuche und –verarbeitung von Lehrkräften bei der Beurteilung von Schülern
Herfordt, Julia; Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL

Scientific Conference (2010, September)

Detailed reference viewed: 50 (0 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailGrundschulempfehlungen in Luxemburg – gleiche Chancen für alle?
Glock, Sabine; Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL; Zöller, Isabelle et al

Scientific Conference (2010, September)

Detailed reference viewed: 34 (0 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailComparison of regression-based modeling methods for judgment data.
Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL; Hörstermann, Thomas UL

Scientific Conference (2010, July)

Detailed reference viewed: 26 (0 UL)
See detailInvited talk - Leistungsbeurteilungen in der Schule
Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL

Scientific Conference (2010, June)

Detailed reference viewed: 25 (0 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe role of information search in the assessment of students’ academic achievements.
Herfordt, Julia; Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL

Scientific Conference (2010, June)

Detailed reference viewed: 24 (0 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailRelevante diagnostische Informationen bei der Erstellung der Übergangsempfehlung – Lehrerwahrnehmung und tatsächliches Entscheidungsverhalten.
Nölle, Ines; Hörstermann, Thomas UL; Gräsel, Cornelia et al

Scientific Conference (2010, March)

Detailed reference viewed: 73 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDie kognitive Repräsentation von Schülertypen bei angehenden Lehrkräften - Eine typologische Analyse
Hörstermann, Thomas UL; Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL; Fischbach, Antoine UL

in Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Bildungswissenschaften (2010), 32

Detailed reference viewed: 166 (17 UL)
See detailExploratorische Faktorenanalyse
Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL; Spinath, Frank

in Holling, H.; B.Schmitz (Eds.) Handbuch Statistik, Methoden und Evaluation (Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. 13) (2010)

Detailed reference viewed: 58 (1 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailStrategies of model construction for the analysis of judgment data
Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL

in Fink, Andreas; Lausen, Berthold; Seidel, Wilfried (Eds.) et al Advances in data analysis, data handling and business intelligence (2010)

This paper is concerned with the types of models researchers use to analyze empirical data in the domain of social judgments and decisions. Models for the analysis of judgment data may be divided into two ... [more ▼]

This paper is concerned with the types of models researchers use to analyze empirical data in the domain of social judgments and decisions. Models for the analysis of judgment data may be divided into two classes depending on the criteria they optimize: Optimizing an internal (mathematical) criterion function with the aim to minimize the discrepancy of values predicted by the model from obtained data or incorporating a substantive underlying theory into the model where model parameters are not only formally defined, but represent specified components of judgments. Results from applying models from both classes to empirical data exhibit considerable differences between the models in construct validity, but not in empirical validity. It may be concluded that any model for the analysis of judgment data implies the selection of a formal theory about judgments. Hence, optimizing a mathematical criterion function does not induce a non-theoretical rationale or neutral tool. As a consequence, models satisfying construct validity seem superior in the domain of judgments and decisions. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 87 (7 UL)