![]() ![]() Ramos, Anne Carolina ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 88 (7 UL)![]() ![]() Ramos, Anne Carolina ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 50 (6 UL)![]() Ramos, Anne Carolina ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 45 (3 UL)![]() Ramos, Anne Carolina ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 24 (4 UL)![]() ![]() Karl, Ute ![]() in Kommission Sozialpädagogik (Ed.) Praktiken der Ein- und Ausschließung in der Sozialen Arbeit. (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 112 (6 UL)![]() Karl, Ute ![]() in Social Work & Society (2015), 13(1), This paper addresses conflict talk in social services. We focus on naturally occurring face-to-face conversations between claimants and personal contact persons in German job centres for young people ... [more ▼] This paper addresses conflict talk in social services. We focus on naturally occurring face-to-face conversations between claimants and personal contact persons in German job centres for young people under the age of 25. Using conversation analysis we identify conflict episodes arising in these conversations. We show how the participants display disagreement/agreement and how they escalate or terminate conflict episodes. We show that participants tend to avoid full confrontation in co-present interaction (both the ‘customer’ and the ‘personal contact person’). They tend to maintain social continuity. On the other hand, many ‘customers’ file a complaint against the decisions of job centres concerning their unemployment benefits. There seems to be a lack of conflict solution potential in this social service organisation. There are not enough intermediate ways to deal with conflicts, which interactants tend to avoid but which are of course still there. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 51 (5 UL)![]() Karl, Ute ![]() ![]() in Aktiv am Liewen (2014), 49 Detailed reference viewed: 29 (1 UL)![]() Karl, Ute ![]() in Bauer, Petra; Weinhardt, Marc (Eds.) Perspektiven sozialpädagogischer Beratung (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 102 (5 UL)![]() Karl, Ute ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 27 (9 UL)![]() Karl, Ute ![]() in ARCHIV für Wissenschaft und Praxis der Sozialen Arbeit (2014), 45(4), 3243 Detailed reference viewed: 124 (1 UL)![]() ![]() Karl, Ute ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 23 (1 UL)![]() Karl, Ute ![]() in Karl, Ute (Ed.) Rationalitäten des Übergangs in Erwerbsarbeit (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 74 (5 UL)![]() Karl, Ute ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 35 (2 UL)![]() ![]() Karl, Ute ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 40 (7 UL)![]() Karl, Ute ![]() Book published by Beltz Juventa (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 88 (13 UL)![]() Karl, Ute ![]() in Karl, Ute (Ed.) Rationalitäten des Übergangs in Erwerbsarbeit (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 69 (0 UL)![]() ; ; et al in Zeitschrift für Volkskunde (2013), 109(II), 181203 This article introduces ethno-psychoanalytically informed supervision of fieldwork as a methodological instrument of reflexive ethnography to the methodological de- bate of the discipline, and aims to ... [more ▼] This article introduces ethno-psychoanalytically informed supervision of fieldwork as a methodological instrument of reflexive ethnography to the methodological de- bate of the discipline, and aims to strengthen this approach in research and teach- ing. The authors identify a contradiction between recurrent calls for reflexive re- search practices and the simultaneous fending off of (self-)reflexive modes of inter- pretation, which are frequently dismissed as overly psychologising or ‘narcissistic’. Using a case study, they show how in research supervision the process of associative interpretation within a group mirrors the irritation of the researcher and the emo- tional dynamics of the field situation. Taboos, power relations, structures of mean- ing and agency within the field are made visible as scenic arrangements and opened up to reflexive interpretation and objectivation. Supervision helps to resolve re- search blockages and to establish the necessary reflexive distance in relation to the field, because of the close relationship between psychoanalytical supervision meth- ods and an open, processual and dialogical ethnography. On an epistemological level, both supervision and research reflection are grounded in the mutual interde- pendence of the (researching) subject’s experience and overarching socio-cultural structures of meaning. The methodological-theoretical parallels between ethno- psychoanalysis and Bourdieu’s understanding of scientific reflexivity are developed, leading to a discussion of the conditions of ethnographic research in academic in- stitutional settings with their mechanisms of exclusions and potentials for suppres- sion and distortion, which are identified as a desideratum in the discipline’s self- reflection. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 177 (4 UL)![]() ; Karl, Ute ![]() in Walther, Andreas; Weinhardt, Marc (Eds.) Beratung im Übergang (2013) Detailed reference viewed: 97 (5 UL)![]() ![]() Karl, Ute ![]() ![]() Scientific Conference (2013) Detailed reference viewed: 35 (3 UL)![]() Karl, Ute ![]() in Schröer, Wolfgang; Stauber, Barbara; Walther, Andreas (Eds.) et al Handbuch Übergänge (2013) Detailed reference viewed: 149 (1 UL) |
||