Injonctions provisoires et droit européen de l’insolvabilité

in Revue Critique de Droit International Privé (2017)

The Promotion of Best Practices in European Civil Procedure: Some Introductory Remarks

in kramer, xandra (Ed.) From common rules to best practices in European Civil Procedure (2017)

An evaluation study of national procedural laws and practices in terms of their impact on the free circulation of judgments and on the equivalence and effectiveness of the procedural protection of consumers under EU consumer law

Report (2017)

In response to the tender specifications the study consists of two parts. The first examines whether divergences in national procedural laws and practices constitute obstacles to mutual trust and, in the ... [more ▼]

In response to the tender specifications the study consists of two parts. The first examines whether divergences in national procedural laws and practices constitute obstacles to mutual trust and, in the affirmative, identifies the locus and the scale of such obstacles; it thereby facilitates the identification of the areas in which mutual trust needs to be further enhanced in line with the European Council Conclusions of 26/27 June 2014. In addition, the study addresses possible obstacles to legal certainty when businesses and citizens engage in cross-border litigation. The second strand of the study evaluates whether and to what extent national procedural laws and practices ensure the effective procedural protection of EU consumers. Both strands of the study investigate the legal and the practical situations in the civil procedural laws of the 28 EU Member States. [less ▲]

Recevabilité du recours contre une ordonnance d'exequatur d’un tiers à une injonction in personam

in Pasicrisie Luxembourgeoise: Recueil Trimestriel de la Jurisprudence Luxembourgeoise (2016)

Étude 730 Mise en œuvre des procédures civiles d'exécution

in Brenner, Claude (Ed.) Le Lamy Droit de l'exécution forcée (2016)

V° France, in Encyclopedia of Private International Law

in Basedow, Jurgen; Ruhl, Giesela; Ferrari, Franco (Eds.) et al Encyclopedia of Private International Law (2016)

Étude 720 Effet des titres étrangers en France

in BRENNER, Claude (Ed.) Le Lamy Droit de l'exécution forcée (2016)

La Lex Mercatoria au XXIe siècle – Une étude empirique et économique

in Journal du Droit International (2016)

Qui profite de la lex mercatoria ? Une étude empirique des données publiées par la Chambre de commerce internationale depuis plus de dix ans et par plusieurs autres institutions arbitrales européenne et ... [more ▼]

Qui profite de la lex mercatoria ? Une étude empirique des données publiées par la Chambre de commerce internationale depuis plus de dix ans et par plusieurs autres institutions arbitrales européenne et asiatiques montrent que les opérateurs du commerce international ne prévoient pratiquement jamais son application dans les contrats internationaux qu’ils concluent. Il semble donc que ces opérateurs ne lui trouvent aucun avantage particulier, voire lui soient hostiles. Ce constat fait naître la question de la vitalité d’une théorie remarquable, mais semble-t-il sans incidence pratique. Il existe pourtant des institutions ayant un intérêt fort, et légitime, au développement de cette théorie, au premier rang desquelles la Chambre de commerce internationale. [less ▲]

Brussels Ibis Regulation, Commentary of Article 46

in Magnus, Ullrich; Mankowski, Peter (Eds.) Brussels Ibis Regulation (2016)

The Brussels Ibis Regulation is to become by far the most prominent cornerstone of the European law of international civil procedure. Its imminence can be easily ascertained by every practitioner even ... [more ▼]

The Brussels Ibis Regulation is to become by far the most prominent cornerstone of the European law of international civil procedure. Its imminence can be easily ascertained by every practitioner even remotely concerned with cross-border work in Europe. However arcane private international law in general might appear to practitioners – the Brussels I Regulation was a well-known and renowned instrument and the Brussels Ibis Regulation will become so as its proper heir. The so called Brussels system has proven its immeasurable and incomparable value for over forty years. The European Court of Justice and the national courts of the Member States have produced an abundance and a treasure of judgments interpreting the Brussels Convention and the Brussels I Regulation. The effort of completing a truly pan-European commentary mirrors the pan-European nature of its fascinating object. This commentary – which of course covers the jurisprudence of the ECJ in a comprehensive manner – assembles a team of very prominent and renowned authors from total Europe. The authors’ geographical provenience stretches from Denmark in the North to Italy in the South and from Portugal and the United Kingdom in the West to Austria in the East. Now the time is ripe to start such an enterprise. This commentary is the first full scale article-by-article commentary in English to address the Brussels Ibis Regulation. It is truly European in nature and style. It provides thorough and succinct in-depth analysis of every single Article and offers most valuable guidance for lawyers, judges and academics throughout Europe. It is an indispensable working tool for all practitioners involved in this field of law. [less ▲]

Brussels Ibis Regulation, Commentary of Article 48

in Magnus, Ulrich; Mankowski, Peter (Eds.) Brussels Ibis Regulation (2016)