References of "Cuniberti, Gilles 50001421"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
See detail口座保全命令に関するEU 規則(EAPO 規則)について
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in 京女法学 (2021), 19

Detailed reference viewed: 24 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCréation d'une association européenne de droit international privé
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Recueil Dalloz (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 51 (2 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCompte rendu de C. Devaux, La fabrique du droit du commerce international - Reguler les risques de capture
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Revue Critique de Droit International Privé (2020), (1), 193

Detailed reference viewed: 40 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailSignalling the enforceability of the forum's judgments abroad
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (2020), (1), 33

The aim of this Article is to document and assess the efforts made by international commercial courts to signal the enforce-ability of their judgments abroad. To that effect, three strategies were ... [more ▼]

The aim of this Article is to document and assess the efforts made by international commercial courts to signal the enforce-ability of their judgments abroad. To that effect, three strategies were developed. The first and most obvious one was to enter into agreements providing for the mutual enforcement of judgments of contracting states which could serve the same function as the 1958 New York Convention for arbitral awards. Yet, as the 2005 Hague Convention has a limited scope and the 2019 Hague Convention is not yet in force, alternative strategies were identified. Several international commercial courts are actively pursuing the conclusion of non binding documents with other courts or even law firms suggesting that the judgments of the forum would be enforced by the courts of other states. Finally, one international court has also explored how it could convert its judgments into arbitral awards. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 55 (6 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailChoice of Law in Latin American Arbitration: Some Empirical Evidence and Reflections on the Latin American Market for Contracts
Cuniberti, Gilles UL; Segovia, Manuel

in Themis Revista de Derecho (2020)

The aim of this Article is to assess the preferences of parties to Latin American international business transactions when they choose the law governing their contracts. For that purpose, we have ... [more ▼]

The aim of this Article is to assess the preferences of parties to Latin American international business transactions when they choose the law governing their contracts. For that purpose, we have conducted an empirical analysis of data that we were able to gather from arbitral institutions active in Latin America, with a focus on years 2011 and 2012. We then offer some reflections on the results and assess whether they can be explained by the territorial approach of choice of law in Latin America, the importance of the United States as a trading partner for Latin American countries and the extent to which Anglo-American lawyers are present on Latin American markets. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 76 (1 UL)
See detailDroit international privé luxembourgeois, Volume 1 (Conflit de lois - Théorie générale, Obligations, Biens, Sociétés)
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

Book published by legitech (2020)

L’ouvrage présente de manière systéma-tique les règles de droit international privé applicables au Grand-Duché du Luxem-bourg. Ce premier volume est consacré à la détermination de la loi applicable et ... [more ▼]

L’ouvrage présente de manière systéma-tique les règles de droit international privé applicables au Grand-Duché du Luxem-bourg. Ce premier volume est consacré à la détermination de la loi applicable et expose la théorie générale du conflit de lois ainsi que les solutions particulières concernant les obligations (contrats, délits, régime gé-néral de l’obligation), les biens (corporels et incorporels) et les sociétés (y compris en cas d’insolvabilité).A l’instar du droit des autres Etats membres, le droit international privé luxembourgeois est dominé par des sources d’origines européenne et internationale. Sa spécificité demeure forte, cependant, car le Luxembourg a ratifié des conven-tions internationales différentes de ses grands voisins francophones et adopté des normes nationales qui s’inspirent de plu-sieurs expériences juridiques étrangères, mais peuvent aussi être originales. Sans négliger la jurisprudence européenne, l’ouvrage tente enfin de rassembler la ju-risprudence des juridictions luxembour-geoises en la matière qui, à nouveau, si elle s’inspire le plus souvent de la jurisprudence française, s’en écarte parfois. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 324 (13 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailJurisdiction to grant interim measures in support of arbitration - The influence of European law
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Yearbook of Private International Law (2020)

Despite the exclusion of arbitration from the European law of jurisdiction and judgments (Brussels I bis Regulation, Lugano Convention), the European Court of Justice has ruled in the Van Uden case that ... [more ▼]

Despite the exclusion of arbitration from the European law of jurisdiction and judgments (Brussels I bis Regulation, Lugano Convention), the European Court of Justice has ruled in the Van Uden case that the jurisdiction of the courts of the Member or contracting States to grant at least certain interim measures in aid of arbitration is governed by these European instruments. This Article explores the consequences of the application of European law on the power of courts to grant such measures and in particular defines the scope of European law in this respect and the limitations that it establishes on the jurisdiction of the courts of the relevant European states. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 57 (4 UL)
See detailMatrimonial Regulations, Commentary of Article 51 - Refusal or Revocation of Declaration of Enforceability
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Viarengo, Ilaria; Franzina, Pietro (Eds.) The EU Regulations on the Property Regimes of International Couples - A Commentary (2020)

This article-by-article Commentary on EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 critically examines the uniform rules adopted by the EU to deal with the property relations of international couples, both ... [more ▼]

This article-by-article Commentary on EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 critically examines the uniform rules adopted by the EU to deal with the property relations of international couples, both married and in registered partnerships. It offers a comprehensive side-by-side discussion of the two Regulations to provide context and a deeper understanding of the issues of jurisdiction, applicable law and recognition of judgements covered. Written by experts from a variety of European countries, this Commentary draws on scholarship and practice from a number of EU states to enrich its analysis and explore pertinent questions of jurisprudence. It also highlights the close relationship of the Regulations with other legislative measures of the EU in the field of private international law, such as on matters of succession and matrimonial matters. This Commentary will be a crucial reference source for practitioners working as family litigation lawyers, estate planning lawyers and notaries. It will also be of interest to scholars and other practitioners working in the field of private international law. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (0 UL)
See detailMatrimonial Regulations, Commentary of Article 37 - Grounds of non recognition
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Viarengo, Ilaria; Franzina, Pietro (Eds.) The EU Regulations on the Property Regimes of International Couples - A Commentary (2020)

This article-by-article Commentary on EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 critically examines the uniform rules adopted by the EU to deal with the property relations of international couples, both ... [more ▼]

This article-by-article Commentary on EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 critically examines the uniform rules adopted by the EU to deal with the property relations of international couples, both married and in registered partnerships. Written by experts from a variety of European countries, it offers a comprehensive side-by-side discussion of the two Regulations to provide context and a deeper understanding of the issues of jurisdiction, applicable law and recognition of judgements covered. Copyright & permissions Recommend to librarian Download leaflet Print page More Information Critical Acclaim Contributors Contents This article-by-article Commentary on EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 critically examines the uniform rules adopted by the EU to deal with the property relations of international couples, both married and in registered partnerships. It offers a comprehensive side-by-side discussion of the two Regulations to provide context and a deeper understanding of the issues of jurisdiction, applicable law and recognition of judgements covered. Written by experts from a variety of European countries, this Commentary draws on scholarship and practice from a number of EU states to enrich its analysis and explore pertinent questions of jurisprudence. It also highlights the close relationship of the Regulations with other legislative measures of the EU in the field of private international law, such as on matters of succession and matrimonial matters. This Commentary will be a crucial reference source for practitioners working as family litigation lawyers, estate planning lawyers and notaries. It will also be of interest to scholars and other practitioners working in the field of private international law. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (0 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailMatrimonial Regulations, Commentary of Article 42 - Enforceability
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Viarengo, Ilaria; Franzina, Pietro (Eds.) The EU Regulations on the Property Regimes of International Couples - A Commentary (2020)

This article-by-article Commentary on EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 critically examines the uniform rules adopted by the EU to deal with the property relations of international couples, both ... [more ▼]

This article-by-article Commentary on EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 critically examines the uniform rules adopted by the EU to deal with the property relations of international couples, both married and in registered partnerships. It offers a comprehensive side-by-side discussion of the two Regulations to provide context and a deeper understanding of the issues of jurisdiction, applicable law and recognition of judgements covered. Written by experts from a variety of European countries, this Commentary draws on scholarship and practice from a number of EU states to enrich its analysis and explore pertinent questions of jurisprudence. It also highlights the close relationship of the Regulations with other legislative measures of the EU in the field of private international law, such as on matters of succession and matrimonial matters. This Commentary will be a crucial reference source for practitioners working as family litigation lawyers, estate planning lawyers and notaries. It will also be of interest to scholars and other practitioners working in the field of private international law. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 10 (0 UL)
See detailMatrimonial Regulations, Commentary of Article 54 - Partial Enforceability
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Viarengo, Ilaria; Franzina, Pietro (Eds.) The EU Regulations on the Property Regimes of International Couples - A Commentary (2020)

This article-by-article Commentary on EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 critically examines the uniform rules adopted by the EU to deal with the property relations of international couples, both ... [more ▼]

This article-by-article Commentary on EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 critically examines the uniform rules adopted by the EU to deal with the property relations of international couples, both married and in registered partnerships. It offers a comprehensive side-by-side discussion of the two Regulations to provide context and a deeper understanding of the issues of jurisdiction, applicable law and recognition of judgements covered. Written by experts from a variety of European countries, this Commentary draws on scholarship and practice from a number of EU states to enrich its analysis and explore pertinent questions of jurisprudence. It also highlights the close relationship of the Regulations with other legislative measures of the EU in the field of private international law, such as on matters of succession and matrimonial matters. This Commentary will be a crucial reference source for practitioners working as family litigation lawyers, estate planning lawyers and notaries. It will also be of interest to scholars and other practitioners working in the field of private international law. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 14 (0 UL)
See detailMatrimonial Regulations, Commentary of Article 60 - Enforceability of Courts Settlements
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Viarengo, Ilaria; Franzina, Pietro (Eds.) The EU Regulations on the Property Regimes of International Couples - A Commentary (2020)

This article-by-article Commentary on EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 critically examines the uniform rules adopted by the EU to deal with the property relations of international couples, both ... [more ▼]

This article-by-article Commentary on EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 critically examines the uniform rules adopted by the EU to deal with the property relations of international couples, both married and in registered partnerships. It offers a comprehensive side-by-side discussion of the two Regulations to provide context and a deeper understanding of the issues of jurisdiction, applicable law and recognition of judgements covered. Written by experts from a variety of European countries, this Commentary draws on scholarship and practice from a number of EU states to enrich its analysis and explore pertinent questions of jurisprudence. It also highlights the close relationship of the Regulations with other legislative measures of the EU in the field of private international law, such as on matters of succession and matrimonial matters. This Commentary will be a crucial reference source for practitioners working as family litigation lawyers, estate planning lawyers and notaries. It will also be of interest to scholars and other practitioners working in the field of private international law. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 25 (0 UL)
See detailShould European teachers focus on European private international law?
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in von Hein, Jan; Kienninger, Eva-Maria; Rühl, Giesela (Eds.) How European is European Private International Law? (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 94 (6 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRecension de Mills, Party Autonomy in Private International Law, CUP 2018
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Revue Critique de Droit International Privé (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 55 (2 UL)
Full Text
See detailPresentacion
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Núñez del Prado, Fabio (Ed.) La tragedia del consentimiento - Hacia una reforma del sistema de justicia en que el arbitraje sea la jurisdicción por defecto (2019)

Frente al paradigma de que la justicia contractual constituye un bien público, el autor sostiene que se ha generado durante los últimos años un proceso de reivindicación en el cual el arbitraje retorna y ... [more ▼]

Frente al paradigma de que la justicia contractual constituye un bien público, el autor sostiene que se ha generado durante los últimos años un proceso de reivindicación en el cual el arbitraje retorna y viene a reclamar un terreno que le pertenece: la resolución de las controversias comerciales. Las personas han notado las ineficiencias del Poder Judicial y se han dado cuenta de que el arbitraje es una mejor elección. Como muestra de ello, en los contratos comerciales relevantes lo usual es pactar un arbitraje. Hoy en día es difícil hallar un contrato importante que no incorpore una cláusula arbitral. En esa línea resulta curioso que muchas veces se considere al arbitraje como un mecanismo alternativo de resolución de conflictos. Y es que se trata de cualquier cosa menos de un mecanismo alternativo. Para el autor, el arbitraje se ha convertido en el mecanismo natural de resolución de controversias comerciales. Fácticamente es la regla, y como tal no puede ser una alternativa. En el marco de este de proceso de reivindicación espontánea, el autor propone consagrar al arbitraje como la “default jurisdiction” (o jurisdicción por defecto) para todas las controversias de carácter patrimonial. En un mundo como el que vivimos el arbitraje ha llegado, y ha llegado para quedarse. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 38 (0 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailNational Report for Luxembourg
Cuniberti, Gilles UL; Conac, Pierre-Henri UL

in Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten (Ed.) The Private International Law of Companies in Europe (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 105 (13 UL)
See detailChoice of law in domestic contracts: towards a right of access foreign financial markets?
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Muir Watt, Horatia (Ed.) Global Private International Law - Adjudication without Frontiers (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 76 (1 UL)
See detailProvisional measures: Provisional Payment - Preservation of Evidence
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Hess, Burkhard; Ortolani, Pietro (Eds.) The Impact of National Procedural Laws and Practices on Mutual Trust and the Free Circulation of Judgments (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 69 (3 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailConflit international de rapports d’expertise judiciaire
Cuniberti, Gilles UL

in Revue Critique de Droit International Privé (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 69 (3 UL)