Browse ORBilu by Open Access
- What it is and what it isn't
- Green Road / Gold Road?
- Ready to Publish. Now What?
- How can I support the OA movement?
- Where can I learn more?
ORBilu is a project developed by
Showing results 1 to 20 of 36
   Conditionality in the European Union External Migration Policy – A Critical AppraisalSilga, Janine  Scientific Conference (2020, January) Detailed reference viewed: 72 (5 UL)Migration, Asylum and EU Discrimination LawSilga, Janine in O’Cinneide, Colm; Ringelheim, Julie; Solanke, Iyiola (Eds.) Edward Elgar Research Handbook on European Anti-Discrimination Law (2020) Detailed reference viewed: 59 (6 UL)The Ambiguity of the Migration and Development Nexus Policy Discourse: Perpetuating the Colonial Legacy?Silga, Janine in UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs (2020) Detailed reference viewed: 101 (1 UL)The Migration-Development Nexus in the European Union Policy Framework – A Legal PerspectiveSilga, Janine Book published by Cambridge University Press (2020) Detailed reference viewed: 125 (7 UL)The ambiguity of the European Union Policy Discourse on the ‘Migration and Development Nexus’: Perpetuating the colonial legacy?Silga, Janine Presentation (2019, March 08) Detailed reference viewed: 93 (3 UL)Droit luxembourgeois et européen de l'AsileChaouche, Fatima ; Gerkrath, Jörg ; Silga, Janine et alBook published by Pasicrisie Luxembourg (2019) "Droit luxembourgeois et européen de l'asile" est un ouvrage collectif consacré à l'étude du droit de la protection internationale au Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. Fondé sur une analyse thématique de la ... [more ▼] "Droit luxembourgeois et européen de l'asile" est un ouvrage collectif consacré à l'étude du droit de la protection internationale au Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. Fondé sur une analyse thématique de la légilsation pertinente, cet ouvrage apporte un éclairage critique des différentes étapes d'une demande de protection internatinale, de son dépôt par le candidat à l'asile à l'adoption d'une décision finale par le ministre compétent. Il est ainsi question d'aborder aussi bien les démarches antérieures et ultérieures à la décision ministérielle d'octroi ou de refus de la protection internationale comme celles relatives à l'accès aux conditions matérielles d'accueil, le droit à l'assistance judiciaire, la détermination de l'âge des jeunes candidats à l'asile, l'accès au marché du travail, les modalités liées au regroupement familial et le sort des déboutés. Le contentieux de la protection internationale fait également l'objet d'analyses approfondies. Cette étude est ainsi l'occasion de mettre en évidence l'évolution et les tensions rencontrées aussi bien dans la jurisprudence administrative luxembourgeoise que dans la jurisprudence européenne (CJUE) et internationale (CourEDH). La diversité des auteurs de cet ouvrage collectif (avocats, magistrats, chercheurs, administrations, ONG, psychologues) apporte une expertise interdisciplinaire permettant de mieux appréhender et questionner le droit de l'asile. Digiré par des chercheurs issus de la Faculté de Droit, d'Économie et de Finance de l'Université du Luxembourg, cet ouvrage collectif se révèlera un outil indispensable aussi bien pour les chercheurs, les praticiens du droit que pour les étudiants. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 415 (77 UL)La détermination de l'âge des jeunes demandeurs de protection internationaleSilga, Janine ; in Chaouche, Fatima; Gerkrath, Jörg; Silga, Janine (Eds.) et al Droit d'Asile au Grand-Duché de Luxembourg - Guide pratique (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 85 (7 UL)Les conditions d'accueil des demandeurs de protection internationaleSilga, Janine in Chaouche, Fatima; Gerkrath, Jörg; Silga, Janine (Eds.) et al Droit d'Asile au Grand-Duché de Luxembourg - Guide pratique (2019) Detailed reference viewed: 99 (16 UL)Luxembourg Financial Aid for Higher Studies and Children of Frontier Workers: Evolution and Challenges in Light of the Case-Law of the Court of JusticeSilga, Janine in European Public Law (2019), 25(1), 13-24 Detailed reference viewed: 105 (4 UL)The Fragmentation of Migrant Workers’ Status and Regularisation: A Legal “Taboo”?Silga, Janine Scientific Conference (2018, September 04) Detailed reference viewed: 56 (3 UL) Portability of Student Benefits in the European Union - The Luxembourg SystemSilga, Janine E-print/Working paper (2018) Since its creation, Luxembourg’s system of financial aid for higher (university) studies has set as its primary objective the increase of the proportion of its resident population holding a higher ... [more ▼] Since its creation, Luxembourg’s system of financial aid for higher (university) studies has set as its primary objective the increase of the proportion of its resident population holding a higher education degree. However, the fact that Luxembourg did not have its own university system until 2003 made this country even more dependent on other European countries to fulfil this policy objective. This explains why the portability of national financial assistance for higher education was crucial to achieve it. In the European Union (EU) context, the portability – or exportability – of student grants or loans may be defined as the faculty for students to ‘export’ such benefits to a Member State that is different from the one which allocates them. Portability is also the reason why the Luxembourg system falls into the scope of EU law, since it may interfere with equal treatment between workers all the more so, as frontier workers account for more than 45% of the country’s labour force. These peculiarities provide the background for the three decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) on the portability of financial aid for higher studies for children of frontier workers that lie at the heart of this paper. It will start by briefly highlighting the evolution of Luxembourg’s system of financial aid for higher education and present its main features. Then, it will show that despite the recent clarifications given by the CJEU in the last two cases of 2016, several issues remain unanswered, both from an EU and national law perspective. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 121 (6 UL)Le droit au regroupement familial des réfugiés mineurs non accompagnés devenus majeurs: l’affaire A et S, entre progrès incontestable et portée relativeSilga, Janine in European Papers (2018) In its decision A and S (judgment of 12 April 2018, case C-550/16, A et S v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie), the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled – for the first time – on the ... [more ▼] In its decision A and S (judgment of 12 April 2018, case C-550/16, A et S v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie), the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled – for the first time – on the relevant date for assessing the minority of an unaccompanied minor who reaches the age of majority in the course of their application for international protection. In this case, a young refugee had introduced an application for international protection while she was still minor of age but subsequently attained the age of majority during the procedure. In accordance with Art. 10, para. 3, let. a), of directive 2003/86 on the right to family reunification, she then applied for temporary residence permits for her relatives in the direct ascending line for the purposes of family reunification. Although she was granted asylum and thus fell within the scope of chapter V of directive 2003/86 laying down more favourable conditions for the family reunification of refugees, the directive was silent on whether she could have benefited from such conditions retroactively. Following its AG in this case, the Court avoided a formalistic interpretation and rather opted for a teleological approach of the more protective provisions of directive 2003/86. By doing so, it allowed their retroactive application to the young refugee and her parents. Through its interpretation, the Court restated its firm intention to protect the best interests of children – including third-country nationals – in the context of family reunification. Although it shows a definitely protective approach, the concrete impact of this decision appears to be somewhat limited in scope. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 143 (13 UL)Financial Instruments in the European Union External Migration Policy: Moving Towards a Generalised ‘Migratory Conditionality’?Silga, Janine Scientific Conference (2018, July 13) Detailed reference viewed: 74 (0 UL)The Variable Access to Reception Conditions for Asylum Seekers in the EU: Protecting Fundamental Rights or Preventing Long-Term Integration?Silga, Janine Presentation (2018, May 25) Detailed reference viewed: 62 (3 UL)The Fragmentation of Reception Conditions for Asylum Seekers in the European Union: Protecting Fundamental Rights or Preventing Long-Term Integration?Silga, Janine in Freedom, Security and Justice: European Legal Studies (2018), (3), 87-115 This article investigates the unequal treatment of asylum seekers across the European Union (EU). In particular, this article explores the way in which Directive 2013/33/EU (the “Reception Conditions ... [more ▼] This article investigates the unequal treatment of asylum seekers across the European Union (EU). In particular, this article explores the way in which Directive 2013/33/EU (the “Reception Conditions Directive”) itself allows for the creation of different categories of asylum seekers who enjoy variable reception conditions as a result. This runs counter the stated objective of the Reception Conditions Directive to harmonise reception conditions in the EU. The fragmented treatment of asylum seekers has become more acute with the current “refugee crisis”, which has highlighted the deficiencies inherent in the reception system created by the Reception Conditions Directive. This article hypothesises that this is caused by the underlying double objective of the EU reception system, namely, to protect the fundamental rights of asylum seekers, while preventing secondary movements within the EU. Examining both the situation at the EU level and in three EU Member States, the article shows the particular challenges of the EU reception system grappling with its seemingly irreconcilable double objective. In the end, the article concludes by pointing out the risk of dismantling asylum by giving in to migration management objectives in the current context. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 80 (10 UL)Access to Housing under the Common European Asylum System – Right or Instrument for Deterring Asylum-Seekers?Silga, Janine Presentation (2017, September 14) Detailed reference viewed: 77 (8 UL)Emerging Similarities in the Recent Cases of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights on the Right to Family Reunification: Convergence or Coincidence?Silga, Janine Presentation (2017, July 06) Detailed reference viewed: 72 (1 UL)“Inflexible Insecurity”: On the Legal Marginalization of Migrant Workers in the EU Labor MarketSilga, Janine Presentation (2017, June 22) Detailed reference viewed: 56 (2 UL)The Reception Conditions of Asylum Seekers in the European Union: Human Rights or Migration Policy Instruments? – The example of HousingSilga, Janine Presentation (2017, May 29) Detailed reference viewed: 57 (3 UL)La Protection de la Victime Contre la Haine Raciale: Le Point de Vue de la VictimeSilga, Janine in Bentouhami, Hourya; Möschel, Mathias (Eds.) Critical Race Theory : une introduction aux grands textes fondateurs (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 57 (2 UL)
1
2
|
||
