![]() ; ; et al in Applied Ontology (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 334 (10 UL)![]() ; ; Humphreys, Llio ![]() in Artificial Intelligence and Law (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 281 (20 UL)![]() ; Humphreys, Llio ![]() ![]() in Seventh IEEE Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (2014) This paper reviews existing approaches to representing legal knowledge for legal requirements engineering. Legal requirement methodologies are rarely developed together with legal practitioners, with the ... [more ▼] This paper reviews existing approaches to representing legal knowledge for legal requirements engineering. Legal requirement methodologies are rarely developed together with legal practitioners, with the result that often approaches are based on a simplified view of law which prevents their acceptance by legal practitioners. In this paper, we analyse how legal practitioners build legal knowledge and possibilities for existing approaches in RELaw to mirror legal practice. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 169 (4 UL)![]() ; Humphreys, Llio ![]() in Palmirani, Monica; Pagallo, Ugo; Casanovas, Pompeu (Eds.) et al AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Models and Ethical Challenges for Legal Systems, Legal Language and Legal Ontologies, Argumentation and Software Agents (2012) We introduce the Eunomos software, an advanced legal document management system with terminology management. We describe the challenges of legal research in an increasingly complex, multi-level and multi ... [more ▼] We introduce the Eunomos software, an advanced legal document management system with terminology management. We describe the challenges of legal research in an increasingly complex, multi-level and multi-lingual world and how the Eunomos software helps expert users keep track of the state of the relevant law on any given topic. We will describe in particular the editorial process for building legal knowledge. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 193 (13 UL) |
||